CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update September 2024
2. October 2024
Dear Community,
We are delighted to share an update on our governance activities for September 2024. This month, we diligently reviewed over 40 networks and participated in voting on 114 proposals across 28 different chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
Kind regards, The CryptoCrew Team ✅
| INJECTIVE #430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Upload Injex Finance Staking Contract Wasm Code | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes Injex Finance's commitment to transparency by opening a thread in the governance forum to inform the Injective Ecosystem about planned contract deployments. However, we would like to point out the absence of a comprehensive whitepaper, the lack of publicly available CosmWasm contract audit reports, information about whether contracts are open or closed source, and a vague, seemingly generic-AI passage within the documentation about Injex security, which literally states: "Is Injex Finance secure? The whitepaper doesn't explicitly mention security measures, audits, or technical details regarding the security of Injex Finance. Therefore, a detailed security assessment would require additional information and a review of the project's technical documentation and security practices." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AGORIC #76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Replace Auctioneer and Upgrade Vaults | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the implemention of the new Auctioneer contract and VaultFactory contract upgrade, including bug fixes and improved error handling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add OSMO-USD perpetual market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the establishment of the OSMO-USD perpetual market by adding essential x/prices, x/perpetuals, and x/clob parameters and setting 'INITIALIZING' to 'ACTIVE' status after 3600 blocks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AXELAR #234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Store Amplifier Router v1.0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favor of uploading the testnet proven and audited Interchain Amplifier related contracts to the Axelar mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AXELAR #235 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Store Amplifier MultisigProver v1.0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favor of uploading the testnet proven and audited Interchain Amplifier related contracts to the Axelar mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KAVA #188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Kava Rise Payouts August 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Declaration of No Confidence in the Interchain Foundation (ICF) Leadership: A Call to Action | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew values the efforts towards greater ICF transparency but declines to support the proposal in its present form due to its legal implications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #954 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Permissionless ICS 3rd Party Audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #955 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Signaling Proposal: Re-route Cosmos Hub PoL Deployments to Hydro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update the Hub’s stATOM/ATOM POL position on Osmosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew rejects proposal #956, citing the presence of an updated proposal, #957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #957 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | AMENDMENT TO #956 - Update the Hub’s stATOM/ATOM POL on Osmosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew affirms the enhancement of the POL liquidity boundaries for stATOM/ATOM on Osmosis to the new range of 1.1, 1.45 from the existing 1.0, 1.35, and delegates authority to the multisig custodians to alter these parameters as necessary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - AMENDMENT TO #956 Airdrop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #959 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Atom SURPRISE Proposal Re-Payment #201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MARS #199 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Reactivate expired IBC client for UX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of reactivating the expired IBC client between UX and Mars after successfully checking the concerning channels: >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-65 - last revision: 1 height: 13374501 host: 3F543851BE0DD33CBC68CC07BF4FCE12156C8C8781FF14274CB980EC94C1C284 | reference: 3F543851BE0DD33CBC68CC07BF4FCE12156C8C8781FF14274CB980EC94C1C284 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-67 - last revision: 1 height: 13576098 host: B218400301AB808A6C5BF6747A960FD73AAE1A339F5117E0FAE485552466E7C4 | reference: B218400301AB808A6C5BF6747A960FD73AAE1A339F5117E0FAE485552466E7C4 ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Whitelist Neptune Developer Address for Wasm Upload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew affirms the decision to permit the Neptune Finance developer team to launch their smart contracts on the Injective mainnet - contracts that are testnet-proven and slated for future auditing, before their official production upgrade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add NEIRO-USD perpetual market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the introduction of the NEIRO-USD perpetual market on the dYdX DEX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #151 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add HNT-USD perpetual market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the HNT-USD perpetual market deploymen to the dYdX network | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Deploy inj-interchain-persona Contract on Injective Mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew respects Helios Collabathon's introduction of Interchain Persona contracts on the Injective mainnet, but votes against it due to the unclear audit status of the open-source contracts and the insufficient time provided for detailed discussion in the governance forum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Increase Static Cap of WBTC.axl to 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to increase the WBTC.eth.axl cap to 75% in Alloyed BTC, allowing more Ethereum-sourced WBTC to convert to the standard BTC alloy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SECRET NETWORK #309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | 2024-Q3 Testnet Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYMENSION #21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | AMM Incentive #7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #434 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 05 August 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal title | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #435 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 02 September 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Launch Incentives - Season 6 Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Migrate ampMNTA to new uploaded code | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes positive to migrate the ampMNTA contracts to support DAO DAO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AXELAR #237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Registering Amplifier Service at ServiceRegistry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the first registration of the Amplifier Service at the Service Registry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AXELAR #236 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Set Amplifier Nexus Gateway in the Nexus module | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to set the parameter for the Amplifier Nexus Gateway in the Nexus module | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #676 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Upload Amp Governance Voting Escrow v1.5.0 contract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the proposal to upload the required contract to decommission Amp Governance to allow early withdrawals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #674 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Instantiate cw-rewards for $BOON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the $BOON cw-rewards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Create a voting DAO for Boon and issue the $BOON token | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts an abstain vote in regards of creating the Boon voting DAO and issue $BOON tokens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Migrate ampMNTA to new uploaded code | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes positive to migrate the ampMNTA contracts to support DAO DAO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Create DAO: $BOON Management | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the proposal to create the $BOON Management DAO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Buyback Frequency (Osmosis stATOM) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to update the NLS market buyback frequency for the stATOM short market from once every 7200 hours to every 12 hours, harmonizing it with other market configurations on Nolus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Osmosis stATOM Pool) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the adjustment of the Osmosis stATOM pool parameters by introducing a 65% minimum utilization threshold | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C4E #10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Upgrade v1.4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Chain4Energy mainnet upgrade to v1.4.1 with block #10243555, delivering Cosmos SDKv0.47.12, IBC-go v7.3.0, CometBFT v0.37.5, a vast amount of WASM module features as well as consensusparam and ibchooks modules, bug fixes etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #678 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Should Kujira join the Rujira Alliance? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Shade Protocol Revenue Share Proposal with Fee Abstraction Module Modification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses SCRT Labs’ proposal to adopt the Osmosis Fee Abstraction Module, improving Secret Network’s UX by offering users the ability to pay tx fees in different tokens apart from $SCRT while offering a revenue stream for Osmosis through a swap fee agreement with Shade Protocol. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #679 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Instantiate cw-rewards for $BOON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the proposal to instantiate cw-rewards for $BOON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #436 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Settle BODEN/USDT PERP and BONK/USDT PERP markets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes regarding the BODEN/USDT and BONK/USDT perp market settlement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #161 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Astroport axlUSDC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees to the planned stkATOM delisting from the axlUSDC oracle swap tree | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Astroport Noble USDC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Neutron Noble USDC oracle swap tree adjustments and delisting stkATOM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #837 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Osmosis v26 Software Upgrade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Osmosis mainnet upgrade to v26.0.0, arriving with block #21046000, adding a new taker fee revenue agreement, upgrading the Cosmos SDK to v0.50 and patching wasmd to v0.53.0 / wasm vm to v2.1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MIGALOO #46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.2.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Migaloo mainnet Upgrade to v4.2.3, arriving with block #8795512 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KUJIRA #680 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Enable DAO DAO v2.5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports setting instantiation permissions for the DAODAO v2.5.0 contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - New Airdrop - September 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #961 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | $ATOM Airdrop - GET (Liquid Staking) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARCHWAY #50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Lower Archway Inflation Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting, focusing on the potential conflict of interest due to the active role as a validator on the Archway mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARCHWAY #51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Reduce Archway Validator Set | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is committed to the principle of decentralization in blockchain and considers this significant reduction of validators on Archway at once as contrary to this fundamental principle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add TRY-USD perpetual market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the introduction of the TRY-USD perpetual market on the dYdX exchange | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #154 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add SUNDOG-USD perpetual market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew perceives the introduction of the SUNDOG-USD market to the dYdX DEX as not advantageous | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OMNIFLIX #43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OmniFlix Hub v5 Software Upgrade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of upgrading the Omniflix Mainnet from v4.1.1 to v5.0.0 with block #13986200, pushing the versions of cosmos-sdk to v0.50.9, ibc-go to v8.4.0, wasmvm to v2.1.2, wasmd to v0.53.0, implementing the circuit v0.1.1 module and fixing / improving onft genesis validation and cosmwasm statesync snapshot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PERSISTENCE #116 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | PersistenceCore v11.15.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the upgrade of Persistence Core-1 to v11.15.0 at block number 18507000, which resolves an IBC timeout issue that resulted in user tokens being locked in the Skip DEX aggregator contract, and corrects problems related to Vesting Accounts within the LSM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Scroll airdrop for osmosis users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal. We also veto this proposal, as onchain governance should not be misused for marketing or advertising purposes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #964 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop Weekend Airdrop 48 Hours Left! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | ⚡Layerzero x Cosmos airdrop⚡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BITSONG #39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Recognize SubDAO: Bitsong Account Deployment SubDAO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew accepts the recognition of the Bitsong Account Deployment SubDAO as an official subDAO of Bitsong | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EVMOS #311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Layerzero x Cosmos airdrop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #840 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO airdrop for osmosis users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EVMOS #312 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | USDC Airdrop - Evmos Airdrop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LUM NETWORK #108 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Fix the IBC link between Lum and Injective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to re-enable the clients between LUM and Injective after successfully checking the client IDs as follows:>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-98 - last revision: 1 height: 3839988host: 0FF8905E435CD5E20BFCED2DF1649A09C226C9F97F2388A2BA8E1A9AD79B8FED | reference: 0FF8905E435CD5E20BFCED2DF1649A09C226C9F97F2388A2BA8E1A9AD79B8FED<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-153 - last revision: 1 height: 4608790host: F0E45E6684BB34862F026419D7A813D11A65D5411C4F30CBD0BBC73F1840FACC | reference: F0E45E6684BB34862F026419D7A813D11A65D5411C4F30CBD0BBC73F1840FACC----------------------------------✅ subject client valid!✅ substitute client valid! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| STARGAZE #287 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Filling GopLend liquidity with community pooling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARCHWAY #52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Lava Public RPC: Boosting UX & DevX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TERRA2 #4820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | USDC Airdrop 48 Hours Left! LUNA Airdrop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal. We also veto this proposal, as onchain governance should not be misused for marketing or advertising purposes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CHIHUAHUA #78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Revamping Chihuahua Communications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CHIHUAHUA #79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | [CORRECTED] Revamping Chihuahua Communications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #438 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add MsgSubmitProposal to ICA host allow messages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees with the addition of the MsgSubmitProposal to the ICA host allow message list | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #437 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Whitelist Ninja Blaze Developer Address for Wasm Upload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew rejects the proposal to whitelist Ninja Blaze's team address due to a conservative policy on contract deployment without preceding governance consent. We are concerned about insufficient details, a missing forum discussion regarding Ninja Blaze contracts, premature contract deployment without completed security audits, and unclear information regarding open-source verification and audit findings. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #841 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Osmosis Representation at Crypto Summit del Caribe II | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #841 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, stOSMO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #440 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add ICON/Balanced Network deployment wallet to Injective whitelist | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew acknowledges ICON's ambition to integrate with the Injective network but cannot endorse the whitelisting of ICON/Balanced Network's team address due to our stringent requirement for governance approval prior to contract deployments. The proposal lacks sufficient information on the smart contracts to be deployed, including testnet results, audit confirmations, and open-source verification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #439 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Whitelist Black Panther Developer Address for Wasm Upload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the whitelisting of Black Panther's team address or introduction of CosmWasm code on the Injective mainnet, citing insufficient governance discussion, a major lack of information, knowledge about adequate testing, and absence of independent audits or open/closed source-status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v6.0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the dYdX v6.0.3 upgrade due to a bug found on the new release | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Signaling Proposal: Revamping NLS Inflation Model | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew decides to abstain from voting on the inflation change, as doing so could lead to a conflict of interest given our active role as a validator on the Nolus mainnet. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| QUICKSILVER #44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Osmosis Pool 903 ProtocolData for Claims and Participation Rewards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports updating the ProtocolData for Osmosis pool 903, updating pools 944, 948, 956, 1087 and adding CL pools 1589, 1590, 1766, 1767, 1765, 1763, 1786, 1245, 1670, 1104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| JUNO #355 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Juno Upgrade (v25) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Juno mainnet upgrade to v25.0.0, arriving with block #19788000, bumping some versions and implementing some security patches | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OMNIFLIX #44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Deploy OEM Contracts on OmniFlix Hub | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the initiation of Phase Two in the NFT toolkit expansion, which includes rolling out the Open Edition Minter contracts on the Omniflix mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARCHWAY #53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Proposal: Sell Nomos Multisig IP to Archway Community | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AXELAR #239 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Regional Moderators Proposal - Axelar Spanish Community (October 2024 - March 2025) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| QUICKSILVER #45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Redemption | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes regarding the redemption updates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Gaia v20 Software Upgrade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the implemention of the Gaia v20 release, arriving with block #22443500, delivering permissionless ICS to launch opt-in consumer chains on the Cosmos hub, enabling ICS with inactive validators, removing unbonding pausing from ICS and bumping wasmd to v0.53.0 and ibc-go to v8.5.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COSMOS HUB #965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | ⚡Layerzero x Cosmos airdrop⚡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| QUICKSILVER #46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Onboard Celestia (chain_id: celestia) onto Quicksilver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Celestia onboarding to the Quicksilver Protocol, enabling the deposit of $TIA (utia) and minting of $qTIA (uqtia). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #441 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Whitelist Ark Protocol Dev Wallet Address for Wasm Upload (InterChain NFT Contracts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports whitelisting the Ark Protocol developers' wallet address to deploy the audited ICS-721 CosmWasm contracts to the Injective mainnet, in order to enable seamless InterChain NFT interactions across the Cosmos ecosystem and beyond | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #442 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Increase max trading leverage to 20x for INJ/USDT PERP, BNB/USDT PERP, and XRP/USDT PERP markets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of increasing the maximum trading leverage of the INJ/USDT PERP, BNB/USDT PERP, and XRP/USDT PERP markets to 20x | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GRAVITY BRIDGE #236 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Neutrino Upgrade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Neutrino upgrade, which pushes the Gravity Bridge binary to v1.12.0 at block #13745970 and updates the Cosmos SDK to v0.46.16, IBC to v6.3.1, and CometBFT to v0.34.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | dYdX Treasury Subdao Proposal - Steakhouse | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | dYdX Treasury Subdao Proposal - Karpatkey | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no_with_veto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | USDC New Version | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #165 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Pin Contract Codes (v0.7.3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is in favour of pinning the contract IDs of the newly stored v0.7.3 codes of the smart contracts on the Nolus Pirin mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CHIHUAHUA #80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Upgrade v8.0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Chihuahua Mainnet upgrade to v8.0.0, arriving with block #14762000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, stOSMO, Reupload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, Close stkOSMO position | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OMNIFLIX #45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Revive Expired Kujira IBC Channel (channel-26) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of reviving the expired IBC channels between Omniflix and Kujira after successfully checking the cliend ID's:>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-43 - last revision: 1 height: 20785655host: 79349F606D7FBC8138A6406C8EB76C7DD92914BF3D74FD1E9B6B370350489BA2 | reference: 79349F606D7FBC8138A6406C8EB76C7DD92914BF3D74FD1E9B6B370350489BA2<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-72 - last revision: 1 height: 22854294host: 679BA65181FEC1C52D92C6C86066A9D135BEFD3C7FBFC6E189F6B13D202D4A0E | reference: 679BA65181FEC1C52D92C6C86066A9D135BEFD3C7FBFC6E189F6B13D202D4A0E----------------------------------✅ subject client valid!✅ substitute client valid! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| JUNO #356 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Reactivate expired IBC client for Oraichain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has successfully checked the Client IDs in question and votes positive regarding the Juno - Oraichain IBC Client reactivation: >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-543 - last revision: 0 height: 31841156host: 64EE8AE5534C91BBAB136F0EE430B136B57FC4EA3BB75882C459E401F4C3298A | reference: 64EE8AE5534C91BBAB136F0EE430B136B57FC4EA3BB75882C459E401F4C3298A<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-566 - last revision: 0 height: 34009287host: 2926ADF7DC1B1CED6A0FB1A90DCFEF9CF951E8F6A7435D5B44856EC1F0F81AA4 | reference: 2926ADF7DC1B1CED6A0FB1A90DCFEF9CF951E8F6A7435D5B44856EC1F0F81AA4----------------------------------✅ subject client valid!✅ substitute client valid! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Pin Contract Codes (v0.7.3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the pinning of contract IDs for the newly updated v0.7.3 smart contracts on the Nolus Pirin mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #167 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.7.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the migration of the Nolus smart contracts to v0.7.2 , dividing the architecture into essential universal contracts and adaptable specific contracts, also phasing out assets like EVMOS and MARS due to low liquidity and integrates stATOM and dATOM for new trading strategies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #168 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Unpin Inactive Contract Codes (Part 1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is supporting the code ID unpinning of 33 old, inactive contracts, namingly IDs from 45 to 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #169 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Unpin Inactive Contract Codes (Part 2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also supports part 2 of the code ID unpinning of 33 old, inactive contracts from 148 to 211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #170 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Unpin Inactive Contract Codes (Part 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves part 3 of the code ID unpinning of 33 old, inactive contracts from 212 to 241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| STARGAZE #288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Mint Revenue Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the changes in mint fee distribution that aim to enhance revenue streams for LiquidityDAO and the Stargaze Team, as proposed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CELESTIA #3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Modify ICA host allow messages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the strategic update to the ICA host's message permissions, transitioning to a curated list of allowed messages to ensure system integrity and minimize vulnerabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INJECTIVE #443 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | INJ 3.0 Inflation Parameters Update 24Q3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew chooses to abstain from voting on changes to Injective chain inflation parameters, citing potential conflicts of interest due to our active status as a validator on the Injective mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #845 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, Transfer qOSMO backing liquidity to Locust | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the significant effort in reviewing OSMO LST support and opts to abstain, deferring to the Osmosis community's judgment on the matter of OSMO LST liquidity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #846 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, Provide backing liquidity to bOSMO via Locust | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the significant effort in reviewing OSMO LST support and opts to abstain, deferring to the Osmosis community's judgment on the matter of OSMO LST liquidity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #847 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | OSMO LST Support Re-evaluation: September 2024, Provide backing liquidity to ampOSMO via Locust | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the significant effort in reviewing OSMO LST support and opts to abstain, deferring to the Osmosis community's judgment on the matter of OSMO LST liquidity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMDEX #237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Revive ComdexKujira IBC client | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the Comdex-Kujira IBC client revival | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BITSONG #40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Authorize Bitsong Account Deployment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes to approve the Bitsong Accounts Deployment SubDAO as an official SubDAO and to authorize the indicated wallet (bitsong13hmdq0slwmff7sej79kfa8mgnx4rl46nj2fvmlgu6u32tz6vfqesdfq4vm) for wasm contract uploads on the Bitsong mainnet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v6.0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an issue found within the proposals upgrade plan name - will vote positively though on the following proposal #160 regarding the upgrade to v6.0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #848 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Add Quote denoms to the permissioned list | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the addition of mentioned quote denoms of Stables, NFTfi, LSTs and high liquidity asset denoms to the permission list | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DYDX PROTOCOL #160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v6.0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v6.0.4 with block #26785000, improving the market mapper for USD/USDT and Determinism fixes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AGORIC #77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | agoric-upgrade-17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Agoric upgrade to v17 at block #16884396, which introduces Orchestration Core to enhance chain orchestration capabilities, improves the storage and memory footprint for validator nodes, and includes various fixes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OSMOSIS #849 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Alloyed BTC: Add ckBTC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the inclusion of ICP's ckBTC, bridged through Omnity, into the Bitcoin Alloy on Osmosis with an initial static rate limit of 10% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew affirms the modification of the Osmosis USDC Oracle swap tree, selecting Alloyed BTC and SOL to improve lease transactions on the Nolus platform | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOLUS #172 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote: | abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title: | Adjust NLS Incentives Scale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on the Nolus rewards scale adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
