Blog
CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update March 2024

CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update March 2024

5. April 2024

We’re pleased to update you on our March 2024 activities, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 142 votes across 26 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.

Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.

 
NOLUS #90
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Astroport)
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Neutron axlUSDC oracle swap tree asset introductions of Persistence's stkATOM, Celestia's TIA and Stride's stTIA
DYMENSION #4
Vote:abstain
Title:AMM Incentive #1
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #587
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract v.1.3.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract upgrade to v.1.3.0
INJECTIVE #353
Vote:yes
Title:Update min price tick and min quantity tick for USDe/USDT market on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the USDe/USDT market min price tick (from 1000000000000000000000 to 0.0001) & min quantity tick adjustments from 0.001 to 0.1
PERSISTENCE #80
Vote:yes
Title:Create new STARS,stkSTARS Metastable Pool on Dexter
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the STARS/stkSTARS Metastable Pool creation on Dexter
OSMOSIS #743
Vote:yes
Title:Create Volume Splitting Group for LSTs of Quote Assets
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the creation of a new volume splitting gauge for the mentioned liquid staking token representatives (qATOM, rATOM, stATOM, stkATOM, milkTIA, stTIA and wstETH)
COSMOS HUB #885
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v15 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the comprehensive Gaia v15 upgrade, integrating IBC v7.3.1, CometBFT v0.37.4, Interchain Security v3.3.1-lsm and Packet Forward Middleware v7.1.2
COSMOS HUB #886
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:New Cosmos $ATOM Fork ⚛️ - AtomOne is READY! ⭐
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
COSMOS HUB #887
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ - New dApps on Atom ⚛️
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
PERSISTENCE #81
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Dexter pools with XPRT and PSTAKE rewards for March 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
JUNO #340
Vote:yes
Title:Juno Upgrade: Mandrake Patch (v21)
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the advancement to version 21 at block 14556500, implementing the Mandrake patch to address a key security vulnerability
KAVA #172
Vote:abstain
Title:WAGMI<>wKAVA LP Authorization
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains due to the same reasons presented in proposal #172
PERSISTENCE #82
Vote:yes
Title:Create new XPRT/STARS Weighted Pool on Dexter
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the proposal to create a 50/50 weighted XPRT/STARS pool on Dexter
OSMOSIS #746
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy Warp Protocol on Osmosis
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of the Warp Protocol deployment after reviewing the Warp contracts CosmWasm code audit
OSMOSIS #747
Vote:abstain
Title:Osmosis Support Lab Funding Round 2024-2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #748
Vote:yes
Title:Migrate the Osmosis<>WhiteWhale Pool interface contracts to complete integration
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports fixing the white-whale<>osmosis cosmwasm pool interface
OSMOSIS #749
Vote:yes
Title:Allow Astroport PCL as wasmpool
Rationale:CryptoCrew advocates for the deployment of an Astroport Outpost on Osmosis to integrate Passive Concentrated Liquidity pools with CosmWasm, benefiting both ecosystems, introducing audited pool types, and cement Osmosis's position as the central liquidity hub of the Cosmos
OSMOSIS #750
Vote:yes
Title:Incentives Adjustment for March 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the March '24 incentive updates and the changes ratified by positive community votes on #740, #743 and #729
MARS #176
Vote:yes
Title:Fix Borrow and Cap Utilization Ratio
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the borrowing function bug fix within the red-bank contract of Osmosis and Neutron, instituting utilization rate checks to avert any exploits that could threaten protocol stability
MARS #177
Vote:yes
Title:milkTIA, AKT Cap Increases - Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the proposal to expand milkTIA and AKT asset caps on Osmosis to 100,000 and 400,000 for enhanced liquidity
MARS #178
Vote:yes
Title:Support CosmWasmPool (transmuter) in Swapper on Osmosis
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the proposal to upgrade the Swapper contract on Osmosis for CosmWasmPool compatibility, enhancing asset swap efficiency and liquidity utilization by adapting to dynamic pool changes
MARS #179
Vote:abstain
Title:Neutron Foundations MARS Grant
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #35
Vote:yes
Title:Add GRT-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the GRT-USD perp market addition to the dYdX exchange
MIGALOO #28
Vote:yes
Title:Osmosis Alliance Creation using ampOsmo
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Osmosis x Migaloo Alliance creation
DYDX PROTOCOL #36
Vote:yes
Title:Add MANA-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the MANA-USD perpetual market addition on the dYdX DEX
MIGALOO #31
Vote:yes
Title:Migaloo Upgrade v4.1.2
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Migaloo mainnet upgrade to v4.1.2 at block 5962700, pushing Cosmos-SDK to v0.47.10, IBC to v7.3.2 and Wasmd to v.0.45.0
TERRA2 #4805
Vote:yes
Title:Phoenix upgrade to v2.10.2
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of the Phoenix upgrade to v2.10.2, arriving at block 9444000, pushing Alliance to v0.3.5, PFM to v7.1.3 and enabling WasmVm 1.5 features
BITSONG #34
Vote:yes
Title:BitSong v0.15.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Bitsong upgrade to v0.15.0, changing Tendermint to CometBFT, pushing wasmd to 0.33.0, IBC-go to 4.4.0 and fixing bugs at block 15947000
INJECTIVE #354
Vote:no
Title:Upload Injex Finance Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew refrains from approving the Injex Finance Contract for Injective, pointing to the unavailability of essential code information, the uncertainty of its open-source nature, and the lack of audits, to safeguard stakers' investments.
QUICKSILVER #31
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.5.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Quicksilver-2 mainnet upgrade to v1.5.0 at block 6365700
KAVA #176
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise payouts for February 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #588
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion OTC Contract Upgrade v1.5.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Fuzion OTC contract upgrade to v1.5.0
KUJIRA #589
Vote:yes
Title:Kujira Smart Contract Oracle Denom Queries
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the Kujira Oracle Denom Queries feature for CosmWasm token price queries
KUJIRA #590
Vote:abstain
Title:UnstakeFi Reserves Swap Adapter
Rationale:CryptoCrew withholds support due to uncertainties whether the code has undergone an audit or not
KUJIRA #591
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy cw20:terra1sxe8u2hjczlekwfkcq0rs28egt38pg3wqzfx4zcrese4fnvzzupsk9gjkq-USK FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains due to the lack of info on the BMOS token
SECRET NETWORK #295
Vote:abstain
Title:2024-Q1 Testnet Committee
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #141
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-132] Co-Incentives Proposal for Turbo ETHX
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #355
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Peggy slashing window
Rationale:CryptoCrew is in favor of updating the slashing parameters associated with Injective's peggy_id
OMNIFLIX #33
Vote:no
Title:Mexc Listing Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not support the community pool spend of 546k $FLIX for a listing on the MEXC CEX
KUJIRA #592
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy ROCK-USK FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the ROCK-USK FIN market addition
COSMOS HUB #888
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:2024 New Version! - New dApps on Atom
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
SOMMELIER #142
Vote:yes
Title:[SIPS-133] Proposal to Add ETH Vesting to Turbo stETH
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the ETH vesting contract addition to the Turbo stETH Cellar
STARGAZE #257
Vote:abstain
Title:Stargaze Liquidity DAO - Request for stOSMO from Community Pool
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #83
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the PersistenceCore v11 Uluru upgrade, arriving at block #15846333, adding the Liquid Stake module, enabling the Rate Sync module, updating the LiquidStakeIBC modlue and enabling the Timeweave integration
BAND PROTOCOL #13
Vote:yes
Title:BCIP-12: Increase the maximum data size for oracle module
Rationale:CryptoCrew enbraces the max_calldata_size and max_report_data_size parameter increasal to 4096 to accomodate generative AI
PERSISTENCE #83
Vote:no
Title:PersistenceCore v11
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no due to missing elements and an upcoming revamped proposal to upgrade on v11
COSMOS HUB #889
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Atom to $1000 - Price Prediction 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
PERSISTENCE #84
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the updated proposal and upgrading PersistenceCore to v11 via Uluru arriving at block #15846333, adding the Liquid Stake module, enabling the Rate Sync module, updating the LiquidStakeIBC modlue and enabling the Timeweave integration
STARGAZE #258
Vote:yes
Title:Live Auctions: Whitelist Denoms
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces adding alternative denominations ($ATOM, $stATOM, stSTARS, wETH.axl and Noble USDC) and associated auction reserve prices to be used in Stargaze's live auctions
KUJIRA #593
Vote:yes
Title:Unstake.fi - Backbone bKUJI permissions
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports granting the unstake.fi - Backbone bKUJI address permissions for the delegate contract
CHIHUAHUA #72
Vote:abstain
Title:Integrate HUAHUA into Cosmos Pay
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
AXELAR #196
Vote:no
Title:Axelarators Community Owned Telegram Group and X (Twitter) Account Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not support the community pool spend of 74,800 AXL towards Interlinked DAO
DYDX PROTOCOL #37
Vote:yes
Title:Add RUNE-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew concurs with the RUNE/USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX DEX
DYDX PROTOCOL #38
Vote:yes
Title:Add AXL-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew vouches for the AXL-USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX DEX
COSMOS HUB #890
Vote:yes
Title:Signaling Proposal: IBC Rate Limiting
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the implementation of Stride Labs rate limiting module to the Cosmos hub as security measure in order to prevent massive in- or outflows of funds in the case of an exploit
INJECTIVE #356
Vote:no
Title:DegenFlips dApp - Upload Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew withholds endorsement for deploying contracts absent of governance dialogue, transparency about open-source availability, auditing evidence, leading to potential threats to user assets
INJECTIVE #357
Vote:yes
Title:Change max_derivative_order_side_count for exchange module
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the proposed parameter changes of the max_derivative_order_side_count for the exchange module from 20 to 100 orders
INJECTIVE #358
Vote:no
Title:NFT Injstaking - Upload contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew keeps it stance towards uploading the Injstaking contract to the Injective Mainnet like stated at proposal #350, criticizing the absence of essential details regarding the code, lack of code audits, insufficient project discourse, and unclear nature if user assets possibly become exposed to risks
INJECTIVE #359
Vote:yes
Title:Upload Aeroscraper Lending & Borrowing Oracle Helper Contract Wasm Code to Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the audited Aeroscraper Lending & Borrowing oracle helper contract integration with the Injective network
QUICKSILVER #32
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.5.1
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the quicksilverd upgrade to v1.5.1, arriving at block 6452000
SOMMELIER #143
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-134] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Arbitrum
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #259
Vote:abstain
Title:Token Allocation for NFT Minters (focused on Hedgies holders)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
MIGALOO #32
Vote:yes
Title:Update Feeburn Parameter
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the feeburn parameter change to 50%
QUICKSILVER #33
Vote:yes
Title:Onboard qDyDx onto Quicksilver mainnet
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the qDyDx asset onboarding to the Quicksilver liquid staking zone
JUNO #341
Vote:yes
Title:Migrate Control For Wynd Juno
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes for the migration of control over the POL assets from the wyJUNO/JUNO pool back to the community under the responsibility of the proposed multisig
STARGAZE #260
Vote:yes
Title:Stargaze v13 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Stargaze mainnet upgrade to v13, arriving at block #12801683, pushing SDK to v0.47.10, Wasmd to v0.45.0, IBC to v7.3.2, CometBFT to v0.37.4, enabling the ICA controller and fixing bugs
COSMOS HUB #891
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Allocate 900k ATOM for The Next - Atom Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
OSMOSIS #751
Vote:yes
Title:Fix SpotPrice query on WhiteWhale Pool interface contracts to fix UI
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports fixing the UI glitch, displaying the wrong price impact on SpotPrice queries of the WhiteWhale pool interface
DYDX PROTOCOL #39
Vote:yes
Title:Add AEVO-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to add the AEVO-USD perp market to the dYdX DEX
DYDX PROTOCOL #40
Vote:yes
Title:Add ASTR-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to add the ASTR-USD perpetual market to the dYdX exchange
DYDX PROTOCOL #41
Vote:yes
Title:Add SNX-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the SNX-USD perpetual market addition on dYdX
INJECTIVE #360
Vote:yes
Title:Update minimum quantity for QUNT/INJ market on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positive on updating the minimum quantity tick of the QUNT/INJ market on Injective Exchange dApps to enhance UX
COMDEX #227
Vote:abstain
Title:Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 6
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #752
Vote:yes
Title:Merge Volume Splitting Groups by shared asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the creation of new volume splitting gauges like described within the proposal
OSMOSIS #753
Vote:yes
Title:Remove Incentives from stIBCX pairings
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to the incentives removal of OSMO incentives of stIBCX pairings
OSMOSIS #754
Vote:abstain
Title:Astroport Incentive Spend for TIA/OSMO
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #594
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy USDC-wBTC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the USDC-wBTC FIN market deployment, votes no though due to reversed quote- and base denoms and yes on #595
KUJIRA #595
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy wBTC-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the USDC-wBTC FIN market deployment
KUJIRA #596
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy ATOM-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the ATOM-USDC FIN market addition
SOMMELIER #144
Vote:yes
Title:Add Fees and Reserves Contract as Approved Cellar
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the FeesAndReserves contract as Cellar ID in the x/cork module
SOMMELIER #145
Vote:yes
Title:Add stETH Token Price and Update Existing
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the addition of stETH prices and updating like stated within the proposal
INJECTIVE #361
Vote:yes
Title:Increase maximum trading leverage for BTC Perp and ETH Perp to 20x
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of increasing the maximum leverage of BTC PERP and ETH PERP to 20x
DYDX PROTOCOL #42
Vote:yes
Title:Add ARKM-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the ARKM-USD perp market addition to the dYdX mainnet
DYDX PROTOCOL #43
Vote:yes
Title:Update Equity Tier Limits
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the equity tier limit adjustments to allow a greater number of open orders, thus increasing the UX and lowering barriers for traders with min. net collateral
DYDX PROTOCOL #44
Vote:abstain
Title:dYdX Community Staking Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #755
Vote:yes
Title:Add authz as ICA host allowed message
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the allowance of authz as ICA host message
OSMOSIS #756
Vote:abstain
Title:Deploy Protocol Owned Liquidity of AXL/OSMO via Astroport PCL
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
EVMOS #272
Vote:abstain
Title:Proposal for Continuation of Liquidity Mining Incentives: Phase 4
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #85
Vote:yes
Title:Param Update: Liquidstake and Ratesync Params
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports updating the Admin Address, Pause and Setting autocompounding fees parameter updates for the liquidstake and rate-sync modules
OSMOSIS #757
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Uptime Incentives default to one minute
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes activating the global uptime incentives parameter for supercharged pool and setting it to one minute, resulting in more reliable liquidity during high volatility periods
CRESCENT #296
Vote:yes
Title:LSV Announcement - Sunset
Rationale:CryptoCrew is supporting Crescents closure of operations and the removal of all current liquid staking validators
OSMOSIS #758
Vote:yes
Title:Upload Persistence LiquidStakeRate Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces Persistence's audited LiquidStakeRate contract and Osmosis-Pool-Ratesync contract deployment on the Osmosis mainnet to handle stkTokens and pools
KUJIRA #597
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy DYM-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the DYM-USDC market deployment on Kujira's FIN DEX
KUJIRA #598
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy TIA-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the deployment of the TIA-USDC market on FIN
KUJIRA #599
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy wETH-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of deploying the wETH-USDC market on Kujira's FIN DEX
KUJIRA #600
Vote:yes
Title:Deploy factory/osmo1z0qrq605sjgcqpylfl4aa6s90x738j7m58wyatt0tdzflg2ha26q67k743/wbtc-USDC FIN Market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports deploying the mentioned wBTC-USDC market on the FIN DEX
INJECTIVE #362
Vote:yes
Title:Upload Aeroscraper Lending & Borrowing Protocol Contract Wasm Code to Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of deploying Aeroscraper's audited Lending & Borrowing protocol contract to the Injective ecosystem
COSMOS HUB #892
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:ATOM Airdrop - 2024 New Version!
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
SOMMELIER #146
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-135] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield USD Arbitrum
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #147
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-136] Real Yield ETH Cellar Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #148
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-137] Real Yield BTC Cellar Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #149
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-138] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Optimism
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #601
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion OTC v1.6.0 Smart Contract Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Fuzion OTC v1.6.0 Smart Contract Upgrade, optimizing the oracle
PERSISTENCE #86
Vote:yes
Title:Create new HUAHUA/stkHUAHUA Metastable Pool on Dexter
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the HUAHUA/stkHUAHUA metastable pool establishment on Dexter
QUICKSILVER #34
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.5.3
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Quicksilver mainnet upgrade to quicksilverd v1.5.3, arriving at block 6556300
MIGALOO #34
Vote:yes
Title:ReStake DAO
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the formation of the ReStake DAO by the Migaloo Foundation
COSMOS HUB #893
Vote:no
Title:Permissioned CosmWasm for better tooling
Rationale:CryptoCrew is not in favor of introducing CosmWasm on the Cosmos Hub and criticizes missing adherence to governance protocols that require debate in the public forum before putting up proposals
INJECTIVE #363
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Labs - Kira Lottery Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #364
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Labs - Ninja Coin Flip Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #365
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Jackpot
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #366
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - User profile & Fee collector
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #367
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - User profile & Fee collector
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #368
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Double
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without ample opportunity for discussion before voting and without clear evidence of thorough testing or unbiased third-party audits
INJECTIVE #369
Vote:abstain
Title:Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 18 March 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #602
Vote:yes
Title:Allow DAO DAO Contract Deployment
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes permitting and instantiating the audited DAO smart contracts on the Kujira mainnet
COSMOS HUB #894
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Atom Halving 2.0 Rewards
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
INJECTIVE #370
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninza Contract - Game
Rationale:CryptoCrew would like to aknowledge the Ninza's team efforts to deploy the Ninza game to Injective but is voting NO, pointing out several concerns: recently created GitHub account (19hr young at the time of writing) with no track record, zero information about who's behind the contracts, who the team is and no evidence of code audits bearing potential risks for user funds
INJECTIVE #371
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninza Contract - Token InGame
Rationale:CryptoCrew would like to aknowledge the Ninza's team efforts to deploy the Ninza game to Injective but is voting NO, pointing out several concerns: recently created GitHub account (19hr young at the time of writing) with no track record, zero information about who's behind the contracts, who the team is and no evidence of code audits bearing potential risks for user funds
INJECTIVE #372
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninza Contract - Multicall
Rationale:CryptoCrew would like to aknowledge the Ninza's team efforts to deploy the Ninza game to Injective but is voting NO, pointing out several concerns: recently created GitHub account (19hr young at the time of writing) with no track record, zero information about who's behind the contracts, who the team is and no evidence of code audits bearing potential risks for user funds
INJECTIVE #373
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninza Contract - Referral
Rationale:CryptoCrew would like to aknowledge the Ninza's team efforts to deploy the Ninza game to Injective but is voting NO, pointing out several concerns: recently created GitHub account (19hr young at the time of writing) with no track record, zero information about who's behind the contracts, who the team is and no evidence of code audits bearing potential risks for user funds
SOMMELIER #150
Vote:yes
Title:Add support for Scroll chain
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports enabling the Cellar management on the Scroll EVM chain
SOMMELIER #151
Vote:yes
Title:Add support for Mantle chain
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes for enabling the Cellar management on the Mantle EVM chain
DYMENSION #6
Vote:yes
Title:Parameter changes: tighten inflation min/max range and reduce goal bonded %
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of updating the min/max inflation range and goal bonded percentage parameters
AXELAR #198
Vote:yes
Title:Update inflation rate for maintaining EVM chains
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of updating the network inflation rate as stated in the governance forum thread
MIGALOO #35
Vote:no
Title:Migaloo Upgrade v4.1.3
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no due to a botched proposal including a wrong upgrade block height
MIGALOO #36
Vote:yes
Title:Migaloo Upgrade v4.1.4
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the upgrade to v4.1.4, fixing a critical cross-chain smart contract interaction issue
MIGALOO #37
Vote:yes
Title:Osmosis Alliance Creation using bOsmo
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Osmosis x Migaloo Alliance creation using bOSMO LST
COSMOS HUB #896
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:2024 New Version! - New dApps on Atom
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy.
COSMOS HUB #895
Vote:no
Title:Signaling Proposal: Permissioned CosmWasm
Rationale:CryptoCrew has not changed it's stance towards CosmWasm on the Cosmos Hub since voting on proposal #69. We consider the underlying proposal #895 to be spam - there are governance protocols in place to be followed, instead of "bumping this [...] to re-open the discussion and check the temperature of it".

Pro Cosmos Hub Minimalism & Security, against permissioned code deployments leading to even higher governance load, particular validators have got no ressources or competence to deal with!
KUJIRA #603
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion OTC 1.7.0 Smart Contract Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Fuzion OTC v1.7.0 Smart Contract Upgrade
KUJIRA #261
Vote:abstain
Title:Move POL liquidity position in OSMO pool #604 to PCL pool
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #45
Vote:yes
Title:Transition DOT to a Foundation
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of transitioning the dYdX Operations Trust to a Cayman foundation
MARS #180
Vote:yes
Title:Interest Rate Adjustments
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the interest rate parameter adjustments for axlUSDC, USDC, USDT and axlWETH, allowing for more stable rates reflecting current market conditions
MARS #181
Vote:yes
Title:LTV Adjustments
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of the proposed Loan to Value ratio increasal of TIA and milkTIA on Osmosis and axlUSDC, NTRN, ATOM and wstETH on Neutron, aiming for a more efficient protocol
MARS #182
Vote:yes
Title:USDC, stATOM Cap Increases - Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the stATOM and USDC (Noble) cap increasals to 500k stATOM and 12M USDC
MARS #183
Vote:yes
Title:WBTC (Native) Listing - Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the native WBTC listing on the Osmosis outpost of the Red Bank, using the Pyth oracle WBTC/USD price feed
INJECTIVE #374
Vote:no
Title:Moon App Staking - Staking contract upgrade (v1.1.0)
Rationale:CryptoCrew cannot support Moon App code deployment without clear disclosure of code audit results, knowing whether the code is open-sourced or not and information about the product's creators
INJECTIVE #375
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Labs - Chads Draw Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew stands against the introduction of CosmWasm code to Injective without enought time for discussion prior putting up proposal and without clear evidence of thorough testing or third-party audits. Ninjalabs states transparency as a main principle - we can't find any open source code. The Ninja Labs Liteaper Docs lacks lots of major information.
AGORIC #71
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-14
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Agoric mainnet upgrade to v14 at block 14450244
EVMOS #273
Vote:abstain
Title:Leveraging Liquidity for Evmos Assets: Tashi's Strategic Initiative for Vault Expansion
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #262
Vote:yes
Title:Add Code Upload Params Addresses
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the Atlas DAO core team address to upload proposed smart contracts to the Stargaze mainnet
KUJIRA #605
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase KUJI staking revenue from Ghost
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

You may also like

Contact & Support

support@ccvalidators.com | office@ccvalidators.com | info@ccvalidators.com

Partners & collaborators