CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update July 2024
2. August 2024
Valued Community, we’re pleased to update you on our governance activities of July 2024, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 133 votes across 22 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
| STARGAZE #281 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Whitelist Deploydon Dev Wallet |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports whitelisting DeployDon's developer wallet address on the Stargaze Mainnet in order to deploy CosmWasm contracts without further governance approval |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #88 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add BLAST-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the BLAST-USD perp market addition to the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #89 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add XMR-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the XMR-USD perp market on the dYdX exchange |
| COSMOS HUB #930 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal - ICS with Inactive Hub Validators |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports prop #930. ICS with Inactive Hub Validators is a highly requested feature. It is needed to onboard sovereign chains to ICS which want to keep a part of their sovereign validator set, that isn't currently part of the Cosmos hub validator active set. "ICS with inactive hub validators" enables inactive provider validators to participate in ICS consumer chain block production, with a slashable amount of ATOM staked on the Cosmos hub |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #90 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add THETA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the THETA-USD market addition on dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #91 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add ENJ-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the ENJ-USD market addition due ENJ being represented in 30+ perp market pairs on other exchanges |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #92 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add 1INCH-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to the 1INCH-USD pair already being present on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #93 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add ZEC-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains because ZEC is already highly represented on over 20 perpetual market pairs |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #94 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add XTZ-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to the XTZ-USD pair already existing on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #95 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add UMA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew changes it's vote on the UMA-USD market addition proposal to no due to the UMA/USD pair being present on the dYdX exchange already |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #96 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add CVX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes due to being the first DEX to list a CVX/USD perpetual market |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #97 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add SUSHI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the SUSHI-USD perp market addition due to it being already present on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #98 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add ZRX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no on proposal #98 due to the ZRX-USD perpetual market already being present on the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #99 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add PENDLE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of being the first DEX to be adding the PENDLE-USD perpetual market |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #100 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add DEGEN-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the DEGEN-USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #101 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add AERO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is against adding the AERO-USD perpetual market to the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #102 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add MNT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does support the dYdX MNT/USD listing as the first DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #103 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add MANTA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the MANTA/USD perpetual market on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #104 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add JASMY-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the JASMY-USD perpetual market to the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #105 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add CORE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the dYdX CORE/USD perpetual market listing as first DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #106 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add PEOPLE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the proposal to add the PEOPLE-USD perp market to the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #107 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add GMX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the GMX-USD perp market addition |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #108 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add POPCAT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against adding the POPCAT-USD perp market to the dYdX DEX |
| NOLUS #126 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.7.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Smart Contract migration to v0.7.0, delivering stablecoin pricing for protocols, SAGA integration, Noble USDC from Neutron and NLS Rewards dispatching functionality |
| OSMOSIS #800 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Grant Router Protocol the Ability to Deploy Contracts on Osmosis |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support granting the Router Protocol deployer address contract uploading rights without governance permission |
| OSMOSIS #801 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist OBridge Deployment’s Address to Upload Contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting OBridge Deployment’s address to upload CosmWasm contracts without further governance approval |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #109 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add PRIME-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the PRIME-USD perp market addition |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #110 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add GALA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports establishing the GALA-USD perp market on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #111 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AXS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the proposal regarding the AXS-USD perp market addition |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #112 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add XAI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes abstain on proposal #112 about adding the XAI-USD perpetual market |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #113 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add MEW-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against adding the MEW-USD perp market on dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #114 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add BEAM-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the BEAM-USD perpetual market to the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #115 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add NEO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the NEO-USD market addition |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #116 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add EGLD-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes to be the first DEX to add the EGLD-USD perp market |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #117 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ALT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of adding the ALT-USD perp market as first decentralized exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #118 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add PIXEL-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the PIXEL-USD perp market listing on dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #119 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add TURBO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against listing the TURBO-USD market on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #120 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add BOME-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against opening the BOME-USD market on dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #121 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Add TRB-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no_with_veto on the TRB-USD market addition citing concerns over alleged market manipulation |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #122 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ZEN-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to be the first DEX listing the ZEN-USD perpetual market |
| COSMOS HUB #936 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM AirDrop - New AirDrop Checker |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| COSMOS HUB #937 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Gaia v18 Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is pleased to support the Gaia v18 upgrade arriving at block #21330500, adding Skip's feemarket module, expedited governance proposals, pushing Golang to v1.22, Cosmos SDK to v0.47.16-ics-lsm, IBC to v7.6.0 and ICS to v4.3.0-lsm. After thorough discussions, this upgrade paves the way for CosmWasm's integration under a clear regulatory framework on the Cosmos Hub, enabling deployments like the DAODAO and Mesh Security without competing with permissionless zones like Neutron |
| SOMMELIER #160 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-150] Update Seven Seas Publisher Information |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of updating the Seven Seas publisher's information |
| SOMMELIER #161 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | No Title |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no on this seemingly botched proposal #161 |
| SOMMELIER #162 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Introduce auction proceeds burn |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the development team to modify the cellar fees module to burn 50% of the proceeds of the auction and distribute the remaining SOMM to stakers |
| INJECTIVE #412 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Quant in Town |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the practice of using onchain governance proposals for promotional or advertising purposes without substantive issue to vote on |
| OSMOSIS #802 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Bootstrapping of ERC-20 Markets using Protocol Liquidity |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| PERSISTENCE #112 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | PersistenceCore v11.14.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Core-1 upgrade to v11.14.0, arriving at block #17453500, refunding the stuck $STARS funds from the liquidstakeibc module |
| STARGAZE #282 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Adding the CryptoGopniks team address to load contracts WL |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the whitelisting of CryptoGopnik's team address "stars1f37v0rdvrred27tlqqcpkrqpzfv6ddr2a97zzu", calling contract deployment proposals "excessive bureaucracy" instead of accepting this step as secúrity measures for the Stargaze Zone. Also we disagree with the passus on the governance forum "test some features in the mainnet" - testnets are for tests, mainnet is for finished and functioning contracts |
| EVMOS #300 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Evmos Collapse |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| NOLUS #127 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin New Contract Codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of pinning the new contract codes from version v0.7.1 to the Pirin mainnet |
| INJECTIVE #413 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deployment of StreamSwap Protocol contracts on Injective Hub |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the deployment of audited StreamSwap contracts on the Injective mainnet |
| SECRET NETWORK #304 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Support IBC Relayers with Fee Grants III |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #938 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Atom Airdrop - Built by Mintscan Team |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| COSMOS HUB #939 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ⚡Layerzero ($ZRO) x Cosmos airdrop⚡ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| COSMOS HUB #941 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ ⚡Layerzero $Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| OSMOSIS #803 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add USDT.solana.pica to Alloyed USDT |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the establishment of the first direct connection between Osmosis and the Solana ecosystem by adding USDT.Solana.pica to the existing allUSDT pool |
| OSMOSIS #804 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Orderbook v2 as CW Pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of uploading the recently fixed version of Orderbook v2 via CosmWasm pool approval proposal, allowing for limit orders being placed at arbitrary price points and being complatible with other liquidity deployments on Osmosis |
| DYMENSION #19 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | AMM Incentive #5 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| JUNO #351 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Hexxagon Proposal for Validator and Chain Upgrade Support |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strictly votes against this proposal trying to hollow out the $JUNO community pool. There's no need for the proposed product |
| NOLUS #128 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.7.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Nolus Pirin-1 mainnet smart contract migration to v0.7.1, including Void Protocol and Rewards Dispatcher removal due to it being obsolete / functionalities are covered by ythe treasury contract |
| OSMOSIS #806 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | IBC Rate Limit Review - July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of reviewing the IBC rate limits, adding USDT.axl and ISLM limits and removing the limits for qATOM according to the governance discussion |
| MIGALOO #42 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.2.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Migaloo upgrade to v4.2.0, updating dependencies, introducing the Tokenfactory, Alliance, and pushing the Cosmos-SDK, IBC, Comet and CometBFT-DB to the latest versions |
| OSMOSIS #807 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Restrict Superfluid pools to a core set of pairings |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports limiting the superfluid staking pools to a limited number to encourage Supercharged pool liquidity migration, following the proposed changes in order to have pools ready for large transactions with low slippage |
| OSMOSIS #805 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Deploydon Address for Contract Uploads |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support whitelisting of any address kind, project or person to deploy contracts on the Osmosis mainnet without further governance approval. We've been sticking to this conservative stance and can make no exception, even for OG CosmWasm devs |
| KAVA #183 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kava Rise Payouts June 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| ARCHWAY #47 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update callback gas limit param |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of the callback gas limit parameter increasal to 1,000,000, allowing to execute more complex transactions |
| MARS #194 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deprecate axlUSDC Market - Osmosis Outpost |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to deprecate the axlUSDC market on Osmosis to support the native nobleUSDC market |
| NOLUS #129 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Nolus Summer Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| EVMOS #301 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | EVMOS Airdrop Last Chance! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| KAVA #184 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Kava New Version USDX Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| KUJIRA #649 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Coral Ops Multisig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees on creating a new Coral Ops DAO |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #123 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add BICO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the BICO-USD market listing |
| INJECTIVE #416 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic Escrow Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. Hence CryptoCrew votes no regarding Exotic CosmWasm contract upload to the Injective mainnet. |
| INJECTIVE #415 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic Staking Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. Hence CryptoCrew votes no regarding Exotic CosmWasm contract upload to the Injective mainnet. |
| INJECTIVE #414 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic Vanilla Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. Hence CryptoCrew votes no regarding Exotic CosmWasm contract upload to the Injective mainnet. |
| KUJIRA #650 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create KART token staking contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew voted yes regarding the KART token staking contract deployment |
| COMDEX #235 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Revive ComdexAkash IBC client |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains about the Comdex-Akash IBC client update |
| QUICKSILVER #42 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.6.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the quicksilver-2 mainnet upgrade to v1.6.2 with block #8222500, adding IBC v6 migration to upgrade handler and adding a couple of fixes |
| EVMOS #302 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - FREE Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| INJECTIVE #417 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 8 July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to a proposal error |
| KUJIRA #651 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.4.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to give the Entropic CW1 address permission to instantiate contracts for Quark v1.4.0 |
| OSMOSIS #808 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Clean up CWPool Whitelist |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the maintenance proposal and removal of obsolete versions of Transmuter #867, White Whale #641, Astroport #842 and Orderbook #885 pools to simplify router maintenance |
| JUNO #352 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Juno Upgrade (v23) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Juno mainnet upgrade, arriving at block #18032000, bumping cometbft to v0.37.8, cosmos-sdk to v0.47.12, async-icq to v7.1.1, ibc-go to v7.6.0, skip/pob to v1.0.5 and updating the token factory module |
| KUJIRA #652 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Unstake Reserve v1.0.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to permit the mentioned Entropic CW1 address instantiation of Unstake Reserve v1.0.2 |
| OSMOSIS #809 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | CosmWasm Pinning Update - July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the code ID pinning updates as proposed, removing 20 and adding 28 code IDs on Osmosis to reduce gas cost per tx |
| COSMOS HUB #982 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Atom Airdrop - New Update Cosmos Hub |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| NOLUS #130 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Price Feeder (Astroport Noble USDC Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the registration of Astroport Noble USDC Oracle price feeders by whitelisting the proposed addresses |
| NOLUS #131 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Second Price Feeder (Astroport Noble USDC Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the registration of Astroport Noble USDC Oracle price feeders by whitelisting the proposed addresses |
| NOLUS #132 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Third Price Feeder (Astroport Noble USDC Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the registration of Astroport Noble USDC Oracle price feeders by whitelisting the proposed addresses |
| NOLUS #133 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Fourth Price Feeder (Astroport Noble USDC Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the registration of Astroport Noble USDC Oracle price feeders by whitelisting the proposed addresses |
| NOLUS #134 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Fifth Price Feeder (Astroport Noble USDC Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the registration of Astroport Noble USDC Oracle price feeders by whitelisting the proposed addresses |
| NOLUS #135 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Neutron Noble USDC Pool) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the Neutron Noble USDC pool lending dynamics modifications, namely enhancing yields until the min. utilization threshold of 65% is reached and optimizing the utilization rates |
| AXELAR #210 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase multisig keygen and signing grace periods |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of increasing the keygen and signing grace periods for validators to submit signatures in time |
| AXELAR #211 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Axelarators Telegram Group and Ecosystem X Account: 6-Month Program Renewal Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the community pool spend of 82,000 AXL towards Interlinked DAO |
| COSMOS HUB #940 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update expired IBC Client tendermint-388 for cosmoshub-4 vs sentinelhub-2 chain |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of updating the expired IBC client between the Cosmos Hub and Sentinel after successfully checking the channels as stated: >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-388 - last revision: 2 height: 7583462 host: D8E17176C5DF29FC45C99C531F7070A9B9DAEB81037226B0B992F3A6B5A2F592 | D8E17176C5DF29FC45C99C531F7070A9B9DAEB81037226B0B992F3A6B5A2F592: null <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-1313 - last revision: 2 height: 17075823 host: 5834FA54AD336FDBDA29E2A6428B01C6E7FE402B91A52FA78F850257EB9C1C65 | reference: 5834FA54AD336FDBDA29E2A6428B01C6E7FE402B91A52FA78F850257EB9C1C65 ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| STARGAZE #284 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add /cosmwasm.wasm.v1beta1.MsgExecuteContract to allowed ICA Messages |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the addition of the MsgExecuteContract message to the allowed ICA messages list in order to enable developers with the best available toolkit on the Stargaze Zone |
| OSMOSIS #812 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Claw Back SAIL DAO Funding |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to claw back the SAIL DAO funding and remaining OSMO liquidity to the community pool due to the mismanagement of community funds by the Migaloo Foundation. |
| OSMOSIS #811 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Proposal to Grant Omnity Network the Ability to Deploy Contracts on Osmosis |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to allow Omnity Network the ability to deploy their audited open source Port contract to the Osmosis Mainnet, creating ckBTC and other BTC assets via Token Factory. |
| AGORIC #75 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-16 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Agoric mainnet upgrade to v16, arriving at block #15959899 |
| OSMOSIS #810 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Approve allASI as Migration Mechanic |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the recognition of allASI as the canonical version of ASI on Osmosis to enable a smooth migration from FET to ASI during the token merger of Fetch.ai, SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol, becoming Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) |
| KAVA #185 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Extend USDT deposit incentives for Kava Lend |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| STARGAZE #285 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Recover Carbon IBC transfer channel |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to substitute the frozen IBC client 07-tendermint-356 between Stargaze and Carbon >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-356 - last revision: 1 height: 57911851 host: E595DABC3CA1C150648D4E82EFD68B8C2597AB44501A4FB68D421FEC41E336A8 | reference: E595DABC3CA1C150648D4E82EFD68B8C2597AB44501A4FB68D421FEC41E336A8 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-364 - last revision: 1 height: 60087496 host: B8F125CBFAE1DBD61D3BEAD1B48C5AF735C0F27D3FB5C006CCA1DF79C1EDF28B | reference: B8F125CBFAE1DBD61D3BEAD1B48C5AF735C0F27D3FB5C006CCA1DF79C1EDF28B ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| INJECTIVE #418 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pause BTC/wUSDM PERP market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a positive vote to pause the BTC/wUSDM PERP market due to the incorrect oracle scale factor mentioned in the proposal |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #124 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add OM-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the OM-USD perp market addition to the dYdX decentralized exchange |
| AXELAR #212 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | KYVE Network Public Good Funding |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| INJECTIVE #419 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 08 July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| KUJIRA #654 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: AutoKujira DAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the AutoKujira DAO creation |
| KUJIRA #653 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Set Contract Admin: Unstake Reserves |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of setting the four CosmWasm contract admins adresses of the Unstake reserve contracts to the Entropic CW1 in order to allow for contract migration |
| AXELAR #213 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Axelar Ai Bot - The way to onboarding more users and developers |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the excessive community pool ask of $30k USD in $AXL for a seemingly unneccesary telegram AI bot |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #126 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update RNDR exchanges to only coinbase pro with RNDR-USD ticker and set min exchanges to 1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the expedited proposal to update the RNDR/USD (ethereum-based) market to RENDER/USD (Solana-based) market, removing all oracles except Coinbase Pro and update min_provider to 1 |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #126 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v5.1.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v5.1.0, arriving at block 21142000, delivering general performance and vault UX improvements, a slinky update, and conditional order triggering |
| STARGAZE #286 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [Correction] Add /cosmwasm.wasm.v1.MsgExecuteContract to allowed ICA Messages |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the corrected proposal to add the MsgExecuteContract message to the allowed ICA messages list in order to enable developers with the best available toolkit on the Stargaze Zone |
| KUJIRA #655 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update MantaDAO DAODAO Voting Module Admin |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to update the voting module of the MantaDAO DAODAO deployment to the Kujira Team's Protocol Admin Wallet (kujira1tsekaqv9vmem0zwskmf90gpf0twl6k57e8vdnq) |
| KUJIRA #656 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.4 (fix), Unstake Reserve v1.0.3 (fix), cw-rewards v2.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of giving the Entropic CW1 address permission to instantiate Quark v1.4.0 Liquifier & Unifier, Unstake reserve v1.0.4 and cw rewards v2.0.0 |
| KUJIRA #657 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable DYDX, CTK, SEI, AQLA & KART Oracle Feed |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the DYDX, CTK, SEI, AQLA & KART price oracle additions |
| AXELAR #214 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update filecoin EVM chain confirmation height |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the move to reduce the Axelar confirmations from 100 to 30 blocks accoring to the Filecoin consensus teams recommendations, reducing cross-chain messages latency |
| JUNO #353 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Juno Communications SubDAO Funding Proposal (3 months) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| MARS #197 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Mars Token Migration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to migrate the Mars protocol governance from the Mars Hub app-chain to the Mars Hub instance on Neutrons DAODAO protocol, alongside a new Neutron-native token and revenue distribution model change stated within the proposal |
| MARS #196 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Validator of last resort |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew usually abstains on community spend proposals, in this case of course supports the security measures to delegate 50M MARS tokens from the community pool to a validator of last resort, to keep the chain from becoming vulnerable during the token migration phase |
| SOMMELIER #163 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add a certificate for PeggyJV for testing purposes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the proposal due to missing information about the proposed changes and no governance forum thread or discussion |
| ODIN #26 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v0.9.3 upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Odin mainnet upgrade to v0.9.3, being released with block #15639500, updating the CosmWasm smart contract module and latest CometBFT version, delivering increased stability and performance improvements |
| KUJIRA #658 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Quark Contract Admins |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew trusts the Entropic CW1 with admin and instantiation rights for all Quark contracts and some erroneously instantiated admin-less contracts |
| COSMOS HUB #943 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Funding ICS with Inactive Validators 3rd Party Audit |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| KUJIRA #660 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin FIN & BOW CosmWasm codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the pinning of FIN & BOW CosmWasm contract IDs, reducing swap cost and gas requirements with BOW |
| KUJIRA #661 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | NAMI Protocol - Upload rebalancer contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to upload NAMI Protocol's audited Rebalancer contract and granting the team instantiation permissions |
| KUJIRA #662 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: The Kartel Project |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes The Kartel Project DAO creation, securing the POA, POL and Reserve Fund |
| KUJIRA #663 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: The Kartel Ops Multisig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also favours the Kartel Ops Multisig DAO creation, holding the Ops & Treasury funds |
| KUJIRA #664 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Casino Reserve Fund |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Kartel Casino Reserve Fund creation, a team-controlled multisig in charge of the Casino Reserve Fund |
| KUJIRA #665 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Casino Buffer Fund |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also votes for the Kartel Casino Buffer Fund creation, collecting user deposits and processing withdrawals limiting fund risks |
| KUJIRA #666 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Please VETO this TEST proposal from MantaDAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to set Kujira Governance as vetoer to protect against governance attacks and try if the vetoing mechanism on the MantaDAO DAODAO infra works as intended |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #127 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add DMAIL-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the addition of the DMAIL-USD perpetual market on dYdX DEX because of the token's limited history, along with insufficient liquidity and trading volume |
| INJECTIVE #420 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Injective Altaris Mainnet Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Injective Altaris Mainnet upgrade, arriving at block #80319200, pushing the Mainnet to v1.13.0 and delivering a large amount of new features & improvements like RWA oracles, a developer toolkit and advanced smart contract upgrade, IBC hooks & PFM integrations, UX, market, staking & security enhancements etc. |
