Governance

CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update January 2024

2. February 2024

Valued Delegators,

We’re pleased to update you on our January 2024 activities, where we engaged in screening over 35 networks and cast 168 votes across 26 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem. Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.

Warm regards, The CryptoCrew Team ✅

www.ccvalidators.com

Chain:	$FLIX
Proposal No.:	27
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	ATOM Airdrop
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	702
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Sail DAO
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	241
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	CryptoGopniks NFT Staking Platform: Minter Contract v.1.1.1
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to upload the CryptoGopniks Minter Contract v1.1.1

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	704
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Incentives Adjustment for January 2024
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of the Osmosis Liquidity Incentive adjustments according to proposal #578 and the addition of TIA Quote asset pairings

Chain:	$WHALE
Proposal No.:	20
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Increase the reward weight for ASH to 0.5%
Rationale:	CryptoCrew abstains on the vote to increase the reward weight of ASH

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	532
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable WHALE as collateral for USK
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports enabling WHALE as collateral for USK

Chain:	$CMDX
Proposal No.:	217
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools – Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 1
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	533
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Fuzion Dustbuster contract deployment to claim and swap rewards and optionally swap to another token in one TX on FIN or Manta

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	262
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Proposal A: Burn 136M EVMOS from the Usage Incentives Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the move to burn 136M $EVMOS from the incentives pool

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	263
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Proposal B: Transfer 136M EVMOS from the Usage Incentives Pool to the Community Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew would rather see the incentives pool funds burned than transferred to the already loaded community pool

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	264
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Community Owned Liquidity on UniDex (500k Evmos)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	306
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Adjust funding rate limit for perpetual markets on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the perpetual markets funding rate limit adjustments from 0.00625% to 0.0625% on Injective Exchange dApps

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	307
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update min price tick and min quantity tick for 4 markets on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in support of the min. price tick and min. quantity tick adjustments for the four mentioned markets in order to provide a better trading experience

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	308
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Trade and Earn Epochs 112-119 Rewards Pool Update for Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	59
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist nolus1zgzdzq8aqxff3naz37594tjfgt7aqde600cm0n as the first price feeder for the Neutron Astroport Oracle smart contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the mentioned address of the first price feeder for the Astroport Oracle smart contract

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	60
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist nolus17vsqxfc0u6esrsz3cnq2nafh6ej8maewm2h7vm as the second price feeder for the Neutron Astroport Oracle smart contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the mentioned address belonging to the second price feeder for the Astroport Oracle smart contract

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	61
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist nolus1t74ve2d6vk7t9adpqu4yuf4jc57n8dxyzu995f as the third price feeder for the Neutron Astroport Oracle smart contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the mentioned address connected to the third price feeder for the Astroport Oracle smart contract

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	62
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist nolus18eu0qer2ajwyurhg2vt3cd5v7h5uavmxmv6aux as the fourth price feeder for the Neutron Astroport Oracle smart contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the mentioned address connected to the fourth price feeder for the Astroport Oracle smart contract

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	63
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist nolus1t09az506kccdypx692gvnqrkr3p5le2fc8leyv as the fifth price feeder for the Neutron Astroport Oracle smart contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the mentioned address of the fifth price feeder for the Astroport Oracle smart contract

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	64
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Pin new contract codes
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to pin the contract IDs of 14 newly stored v0.4.0 and v0.4.1 contracts related to the Reward Dispatcher, Platform core and Protocol contracts to the memory. This reduces gas requirements

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	65
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Unpin old inactive contract codes
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the unpinning of 14 old code IDs of inactive contract

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	65
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	XPRT Liquidity Bootstrapping (XLB) incentives on Dexter and Osmosis – January 2024
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	66
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Incentivize stkATOM pool on Dexter with 300k PSTAKE tokens in January 2024
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	705
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Raise Maximum Gas to 300M and Lower Max Bytes to 5MB
Rationale:	CryptoCrew embraces the block gas limit parameter adjustments to 300M and lowering the blocksize parameter to 5MB with the next chain upgrade. This step shall improve UX, observations will show if the block size would need further adjustments

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	706
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Osmosis Grants Program v3 Renewal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	707
Vote:	Allocate 7m OSMO to the OGP Multisig to Fund Market Making Operations for 12 Months
Proposal Header:	Osmosis Grants Program v3 Renewal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$DYDX
Proposal No.:	6
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Fix the v2 emergency upgrade jailings
Rationale:	CryptoCrew would like to express the opinion that, in this instance, advocating for modifications to the chain state is not justified.

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	162
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	ATOM Interest Rate Parameter Update
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the ATOM market slope_1 parameter adjustments from 0.2 to 0.14 in order to balance the borrowing demand

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	163
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	NTRN Price Feed Migration – Neutron Outpost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of migrating from a current TimeWeightedAveragePrice-based NTRN oracle to a Pyth price feed in an effort to simplify, strenghten by multiple sources and standartize price feeds

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	164
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	axlWBTC Oracle Migration – Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the feed migration from the current BTC/USD Pyth feed to the WBTC/USD feed

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	165
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	TIA LTV Increase – Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the LTV parameter changes for TIA to less conservative numbers (max. LTV from 39% to 53.5% and liquidation LTV from 40% to 55%)

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	166
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	USDC, USDT, AKT Cap Increases – Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of increasing the caps of USDC (Noble) from 1M to 3M, USDT from 500K to 1.5M and AKT from 100K to 200K on the Osmosis outpost

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	534
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	v0.9.3
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Kujira mainnet upgrade to v0.9.3, pushing wasmd v.0.45.0 and wasmvm v1.5.0 at block 16610000

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	221
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add MEME Metadata to Gravity Bridge
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts its vote in support of integrating MEME with the gravity bridge and implementing metadata to facilitate the deployment of an ERC20 representation of MEME on the Ethereum network.

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	66
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add NLS and stATOM to the Neutron Oracle
Rationale:	CryptoCrew agrees to the Oracle swap tree adjustments, adding NLS and stATOM to the Neutron Oracle and introducing dYdX to the oracle swap tree

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	309
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Moon Pad Sale – Upload contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew opposes the deployment of the contract because of deficiencies in the proposal form, including the absence of crucial information about the contract, audit details, and a missing thread on the Injective Commonwealth forum

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	310
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Moon Pad Claim – Upload contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew opposes the deployment of the contract because of deficiencies in the proposal form, including the absence of crucial information about the contract, audit details, and a missing thread on the Injective Commonwealth forum

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	313
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	CryptoGopniks NFT Staking Platform: Staking Platform Contract v.1.3.1
Rationale:	CryptoCrew would like to abstain to participate to quorum, leaving the final decision about the CryptoGopniks contracts upload to the community

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	134
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Injective Volan Mainnet Upgrade (1.12.0)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Injective Volan Mainnet Upgrade at block 57076000

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	708
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Sail it Back: Sail DAO
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	265
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Evmos Mainnet v16.0.0 Upgrade
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of upgrading the Evmos Mainnet to v16.0.0 at block 18295000

Chain:	$QCK
Proposal No.:	27
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.4.5
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is looking forward to the Quicksilver v1.4.5 mainnet upgrade arriving at block 5432500

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	222
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add Neutaro Metadata to Gravity Bridge
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of integrating Neutaro with the gravity bridge and implementing metadata to facilitate the deployment of a NEUTARO ERC20 representation on the Ethereum network

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	67
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Set up a DEX for the Neutron Leaser
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports enabling the Astroport DEX for the Neutron Leaser, specifying the connection between the pirin-1 and neutron-1 networks & IBC channels

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	68
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Set up a DEX for the Neutron Profit
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports setting up the Astroport DEX for the Neutron Profit contract, specifying the connection between the pirin-1 and neutron-1 mainnet networks & IBC channels

Chain:	$JUNO
Proposal No.:	331
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Shift focus from feature upgrades to finishing dApps and dev onboarding
Rationale:	CryptoCrew does not endorse the proposition to ‘halt feature upgrades for now.’ While completing dApps and facilitating developer onboarding are crucial tasks, they should not come at the cost of canceling development efforts

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	870
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	ATOM Airdrop 2024 New Version!
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	709
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	ProtoRev usage: Send non-OSMO revenue to Community Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew advocates for the collection of non-OSMO ProtoRev module reward assets within the community pool, aiming to diversify holdings and accumulate stable assets.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	710
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	ProtoRev usage: OSMO revenue as Burn Mechanism
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favor of burning OSMO ProtoRev module reward assets, incentivizing value generation by reducing the max supply and potentially initiating token deflation

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	711
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Osmosis Grants Program v3 Renewal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	712
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Allocate 7m OSMO to the OGP Multisig to Fund Market Making Operations for 12 Months
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	700
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Neutron <> Osmosis Alignment
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	535
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Increase stATOM mint cap to 1.5M USK
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the stATOM mint cap increasal to 1.5M

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	537
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	$100k SHD / KUJI Token Swap with Kujira Community Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	315
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Upload the iLend Protocol contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew appreciates Zpoken’s initiative to implement the iLend Protocol contract on the Injective mainnet. However, we cast a negative vote, citing the absence of a governance forum discussion and insufficient details regarding an iLend contract code audit

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	266
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Generate USDC Revenue by Lending Part of EVMOS Treasury through Covered Calls
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	109
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Generate USDC Revenue by Lending Part of EVMOS Treasury through Covered Calls
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	540
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update Instantiate Config: Orca v1.0.3
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of updating Orca to v1.0.3

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	242
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	STARS Incentives to bootstrap stSTARS Lending And Collateral on Demex
Rationale:	CryptoCrew does not support the community pool spend of 166667 $STARS as incentives on Demex

Chain:	$QCK
Proposal No.:	28
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.4.6
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is embracing the Quicksilver v1.4.5 mainnet upgrade arriving at block 5493000

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	713
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add Noble USDC as fee denom
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of adding Noble USDC as fee denom on the Osmosis DEX

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	243
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Stargaze Names Renewal Update
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of renewing the Stargaze Names, let everyone keep their names without renewal, change the bid fee and cap the annual fee at 10k per year

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	69
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Switch to Supercharged pools for STRD and JUNO
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the STRD/OSMO and JUNO/OSMO pools IDs migration to the new concentraded liquidity counterparts and make the needed adjustments to the Oracle swap tree

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	70
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Increase interest recalculation period (Osmosis)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of increasing the interest recalculation period for OSMO lease positions from 2 hours to 5 days

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	71
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Increase interest recalculation period (Neutron)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew embraces the interest recalculation period increasal for on Neutron lease positions from 2 hours to 5 days

Chain:	$CMDX
Proposal No.:	219
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools – Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 2
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KAVA
Proposal No.:	171
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	MsgExec
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	167
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	stkATOM Listing on Neutron
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the stkATOM listing to be used as collateral asset on the Neutron outpost of the Red Bank

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	542
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable TIA Oracle Feed
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to add TIA to the oracle price feed

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	714
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Osmosis v22 Software Upgrade
Rationale:	CryptoCrew aknowledges and supports the forthcoming Osmosis mainnet upgrade to v22.0.0, scheduled to take place at block 13325950

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	67
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	PersistenceCore v10.3.0 Upgrade
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the PersistenceCore upgrade to v10.3.0 at block 14965000

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	223
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Setup Neutaro IBC Auto-Forwarding
Rationale:	CryptoCrew embraces setting up the Neutaro IBC Auto-Forwarding by establishing the bech32 address prefix ‘neutaro’ and the associated channel-148

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	224
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Setup MEME IBC Auto-Forwarding
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports setting up the MEME IBC Auto-Forwarding by establishing the bech32 address prefix ‘meme’ and the associated channel-149

Chain:	$QCK
Proposal No.:	29
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable unbonding from Quicksilver
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of changing the UnbondingEnabled parameter in the interchainstaking subspace from ‘false’ to ‘true’, enabling unbonding from Quicksilver

Chain:	$FLIX
Proposal No.:	28
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	OmniFlix Hub v2 Software Upgrade
Rationale:	CryptoCrew would like to welcome the OmniflixHub upgrade to v2.0.0, scheduled at block #10428200

Chain:	$HUAHUA
Proposal No.:	69
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Paws and Prosper: Enhancing the Chihuahua Chain Community Pool for Meme Mastery
Rationale:	CryptoCrew woofs in support of the diversifying and stabilizing efforts of the Paws and Prosper proposal, has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals though as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	715
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Deploy Protocol Owned Liquidity of stSTARS/STARS
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$CMDX
Proposal No.:	218
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Unfreeze IBC Client towards AssetMantle
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes unfreezing the IBC client towards AssetMantle and has confirmed the clients as follows >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-131 – last revision: 1 height: 8116010 host: null \| reference: null <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-203 – last revision: 1 height: 9374565 host: 9C09FCA0D417A2F49D45612D0399C3EBB8FA86746CCDB828AA1CACBA14BDEB4A \| reference: 9C09FCA0D417A2F49D45612D0399C3EBB8FA86746CCDB828AA1CACBA14BDEB4A ———————————- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid!

Chain:	$LUNA
Proposal No.:	4797
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	TFL Delegation: Equal Amount Delegation for Fairness
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$LUNA
Proposal No.:	4798
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Phoenix upgrade v2.9.1
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Terra Mainnet v2.9.1 Phoenix upgrade at block 8782000

Chain:	$WHALE
Proposal No.:	22
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Ash Dao Grant Proposal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	872
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	ATOM Airdrop 2024 New Version!
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	318
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update min price tick and min quantity tick for GINGER/INJ on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the minimum price tick size adjustments related to the GINGER/INJ market

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	267
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Align Inflation Distribution Between Staking Rewards And Community Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	319
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	iLend contract upgrade (admin functions for markets management)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of updating the iLend contract

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	543
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Deploy ANDR-USK FIN Market
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the ANDR-USK FIN market deployment

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	716
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist Addresses for SAIL DAO deployments
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is aligning with the community’s preference outlined in proposal #708 regarding the SAIL DAO. This entails the crucial step to authorize the deployment of contracts without the need for additional governance proposals

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	320
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Whitelist address for new provider oracle
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Injective Labs maintained wallet whitelisting in order to create a new pricing feed on demand

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	544
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	deploy bonekuji steak
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the audited bonekuji steak contracts deployment on the Kuji mainnet

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	545
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	deploy bonekuji steak
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a negative vote citing an alleged error in the proposal.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	546
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	deploy bonekuji feelsplit
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the audited bonekuji steak contracts deployment on the Kuji mainnet

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	547
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update Instantiate Config: Orca v1.0.4
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the Orca upgrade to v1.0.4 to fix edge case bugs

Chain:	$KAVA
Proposal No.:	172
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	WAGMI Pool Creation on Kinetix
Rationale:	CryptoCrew refrains from voting because the proposal details file cannot be opened

Chain:	$CMDX
Proposal No.:	220
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update limit order lifespan on cSwap from 1day to 7days
Rationale:	CryptoCrew embraces updating the max. allowed lifespan of limit orders on cSwap from 1 day to 7 day

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	110
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	#110Community Pool Spend
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	267
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Align Inflation Distribution Between Staking Rewards And Community Pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	873
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	ATOM Airdrop 2024 New Version!
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$AXL
Proposal No.:	191
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Axelar India Launch – 2023-24 – Phase 2
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KAVA
Proposal No.:	172
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	WAGMI Pool Creation on Kinetix
Rationale:	CryptoCrew abstains from voting due to the unaccesability of the proposal details description on IPFS and the decision to abstain from as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	321
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	NinjaRoll Deployment
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the NinjaRoll code deployment on the Injective mainnet

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	72
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Pirin v0.5.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Nolus Pirin mainnet upgrade to 3659000

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	549
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	deploy bonekuji steak. attempt 2
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the audited bonekuji steak contracts deployment on the Kuji mainnet

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	322
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Proposal: Hinata Contract Upload
Rationale:	CryptoCrew withholds support for the uploading of Hinata contracts on the Injective mainnet. This decision is based on the absence of vital information regarding the contracts, such as audit results, and the lack of discussion within the community forum.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	323
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Moon App Launchpad – Upload contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Moon App sale contract deployment on the Injective mainnet

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	324
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Adjust Trade & Earn reward points
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of adjusting the Trade & Earn reward points according to the proposal

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	325
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 25 December 2023
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$BLD
Proposal No.:	67
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Signaling proposal for new collateral: stkATOM for Inter Protocol [PSM/Vaults]
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favour of onboarding stkATOM as collateral for IST

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	550
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	deploy bonekuji steak. attempt 3.
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the audited bonekuji steak contracts deployment on the Kuji mainnet and is looking forward to the promised beer!

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	717
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update Transaction Fee Whitelist
Rationale:	CryptoCrew expresses approval for the inclusion of all specified tokens in the transaction fee whitelist. The inclusion allows them to serve as alternative gas fees on the Osmosis DEX.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	868
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Decrease InflationMin parameter to 0%
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has chosen to abstain from voting on the proposal to set the chain inflation parameter to 0%. Instead, we recommend that any adjustments to ATOM inflation be part of a comprehensive strategy within a broader ATOM tokenomics overhaul plan. This plan should meticulously evaluate the potential impacts of each possible parameter change on all ecosystem participants. We recognize that discussions on these changes are ongoing and subject to evolution as new data and interpretations emerge regularly. Although our inclination has leaned toward a ‘no’ vote due to what we perceive as an insufficiently evolved discussion, we have opted for abstention, demonstrating our openness to align with the broader community consensus. In the event that the proposed change is accepted but leads to adverse consequences, we are committed to actively monitoring its impact and are prepared to promptly propose and implement further modifications. As a community, it is crucial for us to remain adaptable and responsive, ensuring that our actions are guided by a thorough analysis of outcomes and feedback.

Chain:	$AXL
Proposal No.:	192
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Axelar regional communities Dec23-Jan24
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	867
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Validator incentivization
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	871
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update Client: Revive client to Realio
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the IBC client revival to Realio and has confirmed the clients as follows >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-1157 – last revision: 1 height: 4154973 host: F5427BF6830342A42C62FC05AD3ADC6FC172F2E15151114B509AFD697CC90BE1 \| reference: F5427BF6830342A42C62FC05AD3ADC6FC172F2E15151114B509AFD697CC90BE1 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-1200 – last revision: 1 height: 4848232 host: 27202A884CC3E08F7C7C97854E6D9EAD5B13838B57996826443820AFDF8B1EDF \| reference: 27202A884CC3E08F7C7C97854E6D9EAD5B13838B57996826443820AFDF8B1EDF ———————————- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid!

Chain:	$DYDX
Proposal No.:	7
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v3.0.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v3.0.0 at block 7147832, enabling the ICA Host Module

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	244
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Funding Proposal for PLStaking: A Soft-Staking Platform
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is casting a negative vote because the proposal lacks a specified funding amount, which has been addressed in the revised proposal #245

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	245
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Funding Proposal for PLStaking: A Soft-Staking Platform
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ODIN
Proposal No.:	19
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Substitute IBC client for osmosis-1
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of substituting the IBC client to Osmosis

Chain:	$CMDX
Proposal No.:	221
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Proposal for a one-time halving of inflation on-chain
Rationale:	CryptoCrew endorses Comdex’s transition to new tokenomics, commencing with a one-time halving of the current chain inflation.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	551
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	UpdateInstantiateConfig bKuji/Steak
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to allow contract instantiations by the mentioned address

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	552
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	UpdateInstantiateConfig bKuji/DustCollector
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to allow contract instantiations by the mentioned address

Chain:	$TORI
Proposal No.:	38
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Consensus upgrade to v2.0.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports upgrading the Teritori Mainnet Consensus to v2.0.0

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	554
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable SHD Oracle Feed
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the SHD oracle feed addition on KUJI

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	114
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-110] MaxMorphoETH Incentives Proposal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	113
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-109] Authorize the Yield Maxi USDC Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the Yield Maxi USDC Cellar autorization

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	112
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-105] Authorize the Turbo CRVUSD Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is voting for the approval of authorizing the Turbo CRVUSD Cellar

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	111
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-104] Authorize the Morpho ETH Maximizer Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is casting its vote in favor of authorizing the Morpho ETH Maximizer Cellar

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	73
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Raise the minimum utilization threshold of the Neutron axlUSDC pool
Rationale:	CryptoCrew endorses the Neutron axlUSDC LPP smart contract adjustments, raising the minimum utilization threshold to 65%

Chain:	$NLS
Proposal No.:	74
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Increase voting period
Rationale:	CryptoCrew backs the proposal to revert to a 3-day voting period, providing governance participants with increased reaction time to newly submitted proposals

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	169
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	milkTIA Listing – Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a positive vote for the proposal to list milkTIA on the Osmosis outpost of the Red Bank

Chain:	$MARS
Proposal No.:	168
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Remove debt from total deposit formula
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports upgrading the formula for total deposit query of the params contract

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	326
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Trade & Earn Multiplier Updates on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew favors the proposal to reset multipliers for other markets while elevating T&E multipliers for JUP/USDT PERP and ZRO/USDT PERP to 50x

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	327
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Upload Stax NFT and Splitter Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:	CryptoCrew does not support the proposal for the STAX smart contract deployment due to concerns, including the absence of essential information such as code audits, a lack of discussion in the governance forum, and insufficient project details

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	226
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Round2 Gravity Growth and Sustainability Grant
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$GRAV
Proposal No.:	225
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Reduce inflation from 5.5% to 4%
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of reducing the Gravity Bridge’s chain inflation to 4% as planned

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	269
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Register CROWDP Token as an IBC Coin
Rationale:	CryptoCrew positively votes for the registration of the CROWDP ERC-20 token

Chain:	$EVMOS
Proposal No.:	268
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Register BERLIN Token as an IBC Coin
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the ERC-20 registration of the BERLIN token

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	718
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add 0.01% and 0% fee pools to the ATOM/OSMO volume splitting gauges
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of the addition of 0.01% and 0% fee pools to the ATOM/OSMO volume splitting gauges

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	874
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	ATOM Airdrop 2024 New Update!
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	246
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Publicworks.art generative NFT SG721 v0.2.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the Publicworks.art generative NFT SG721 contract upgrade to v0.2.0

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	247
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Publicworks.art generative NFT Minter v0.2.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew endorses the upgrade of the Publicworks.art generative NFT Minter contract to v0.2.0

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	328
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 22 January 2024
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	329
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	DOJO/INJ Spot Market Launch
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes the DOJO/INJ spot market launch with maker and taker fees -0.002% and 0.02% on Injective

Chain:	$LUM
Proposal No.:	97
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Upgrade core v1.6.4
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in support of upgrading the Lum Network to v1.6.4 at block 11390000

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	719
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Add WBTC.axl as a Quote Asset for Supercharged pools
Rationale:	CryptoCrew endorses the proposal to include WTBC.axl as a quote asset.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	330
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Upload Out.app Vouching System Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:	CryptoCrew advocates for the deployment of Out.app’s reviewed Vouching System Contract

Chain:	$HUAHUA
Proposal No.:	71
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Community Spend for Coinhall Integration
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	556
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Instantiate FIN Swap Adapter Contract
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes yes to instantiate the FIN swap adapter contract to allow users to withdraw GHOST xASSETS and BOW LP-tokens using the same interfaces as the FIN Swap

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	557
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable STKATOM Oracle Feed
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes enabling the STKATOM oracle feed

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	558
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Enable stkATOM on Ghost
Rationale:	CryptoCrew embraces enabling stkATOM lending and borrowing on Kujira Ghost

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	559
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.1.0: Optimizations, Restructuring, and Bugfixes
Rationale:	CryptoCrew welcomes granting the Quark admins address rights to instantiate contracts to optimize gas, improve composability and fix bugs

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	248
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Governance Fee Update
Rationale:	CryptoCrew is in favor of adjusting the governance proposal fee, advocating for a decrease from 50k STARS and a 25% deposit to 25k STARS while maintaining the existing deposit

Chain:	$JUNO
Proposal No.:	333
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Juno Upgrade: Rhea (v19)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew appreciates the Rhea upgrade to v19 on the Juno Mainnet set to occur at block 13678871

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	115
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-111] Authorize the Turbo DIVETH Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of authorizing Seven Seas Capital’s Turbo DIVETH cellar

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	116
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-112] Authorize the Turbo ETHX Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports Seven Seas Capital’s Turbo ETHX Cellar authorization

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	68
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	PersistenceCore v10.4.0
Rationale:	CryptoCrew anticipates the upcoming mainnet upgrade of Persistence to v10.4.0, scheduled to take place at block 15242222

Chain:	$OSMO
Proposal No.:	720
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Create new Volume Splitting Gauge for OSMO/ATOM (Action Proposal 718)
Rationale:	CryptoCrew supports the creation of new volume splitting gauges for OSMO/ATOM following proposal 718

Chain:	$DYDX
Proposal No.:	8
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	dYdX Foundation $30M Fundraising
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$CRE
Proposal No.:	293
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	Re-vote: 2024 version
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	69
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Incentivization of Dexter pools with XPRT from Dexter Grant for February 2024
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	332
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	Upload Stax Coinflip Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:	CryptoCrew does not endorse the deployment of the Stax Coinflip Contract on the Injective Mainnet due to the absence of code audits and the non-existence of a governance forum for presentation and discussion.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	333
Vote:	no
Proposal Header:	NinjaVault Deployment
Rationale:	CryptoCrew does not endorse the uploading of code without proper presentation and discussion on the governance forum, especially in cases where code audits or GitHub repositories have not been shared or presented.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	331
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Parameter Updates for Markets on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew consents to modifying the market parameters of the SOL/USDT PERP, INJ/USDT PERP, ATOM/USDT PERP, and DOJO/INJ markets in accordance with the details outlined in the proposal.

Chain:	$KUJI
Proposal No.:	560
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Global Instantiate Permission: Smart Accounts
Rationale:	CryptoCrew approves the introduction of Smart Accounts, allowing users to create secure, transferrable addresses and facilitating various use-cases like complete portfolio auctions and debt marketplaces.

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	117
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-113] Co-Incentives Proposal for Turbo ETHX
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$SOMM
Proposal No.:	118
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	[SIPS-107] Authorize the Turbo EETH V2 Cellar
Rationale:	CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of authorizing Seven Seas Capital’s Turbo EETH V2 Cellar

Chain:	$XPRT
Proposal No.:	70
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Allocate 1M XPRT for XPRT liquidity and Dexter incentives for 6 months
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.

Chain:	$ATOM
Proposal No.:	875
Vote:	no_with_veto
Proposal Header:	💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ New Deluxe version✨
Rationale:	CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal.

Chain:	$INJ
Proposal No.:	334
Vote:	yes
Proposal Header:	Launch OP/USDT PERP and ARB/USDT PERP Markets, Relaunch OSMO/USDT PERP Market for Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:	CryptoCrew votes in favor of introducing OP/USDT and ARB/USDT perpetual markets, and restarting the OSMO/USDT perpetual market with updated margin ratios, utilizing a Pyth price feed oracle.

Chain:	$STARS
Proposal No.:	249
Vote:	abstain
Proposal Header:	Stargaze LiquidityDAO Proposal
Rationale:	CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.