CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update February 2024
15. March 2024
Valued Delegators,
We’re pleased to update you on our February 2024 activities, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 193 votes across 27 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
Kind regards, The CryptoCrew Team ✅
| $DYDX #8 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | dYdX Foundation $30M Fundraising |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYDX #9 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Launch Incentives - Season 1 Distribution |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $FLIX #29 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | OmniFlix Hub v2.1 upgrade proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is excited to embrace the Omniflix mainnet's transition to version 2.1.0, set to occur at block 10678600. |
| $LUNA #4799 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - 2024 New Version! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal. |
| $ATOM #876 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New dApps on Atom - Stay up to date! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal. |
| $CMDX #222 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 3 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $INJ #335 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic Vanilla Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. |
| $INJ #336 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic Holding Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. |
| $INJ #337 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Exotic RFQ Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew emphasizes the importance of transparency and due diligence in the deployment of Exotic Contracts. We advocate for a thorough presentation and discussion within the governance forum prior to the upload of any code. Without access to code audits and GitHub repositories, it's impossible to verify the legitimacy of the code or assess its potential risks to the Injective community. |
| $INJ #338 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Ninja Blaze NFT Contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew values the initiative taken by Ninja Blaze to introduce the contract through Injective's governance forum and to share their Jackpot Contract audit. However, it appears that the NFT Contract was not included in the audit, leaving us unable to confirm the code's authenticity or evaluate its potential implications for the Injective community. |
| $INJ #339 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update JUP/USDT PERP Oracle on Injective Exchange dApps |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports this proposal, updating the JUP/USDT PERP market's oracle to a Pyth price feed, moving away from a Binance-based price feed. |
| $OSMO #721 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add 0.01% fee CL pool to WBTC/OSMO volume splitting gauges |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of adjusting the Osmosis Liquidity Incentives according to the methodology outlined in proposal 578 |
| $STARS #250 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Collection Creation Fee Update |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses establishing the NFT Collection Creation Fee in USD, to mitigate the impact of $STARS price volatility, ensuring stable and predictable fees while awaiting Oracle integration for dynamic adjustments. |
| $QCK #30 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.4.7 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to upgrade the Quicksilver mainnet to v1.4.7 at block 5848000, addressing critical bugs in unbonding calculations and enhancing transaction processing |
| $XPRT #71 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Create stkDYDX/DYDX metastable pool on Dexter |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the stkDYDX/DYDX pool creation on Dexter but has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYDX #10 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add JUP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the addition of a JUP-USD perpetual market, including necessary x/prices, x/perpetuals, and x/clob parameters |
| $JUNO #332 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reactivate expired IBC client for Teritori |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of replacing the IBC client with Teritori following the successful verification of client IDs >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-268 - last revision: 1 height: 4350632 host: 3321D17E6411AC82E4D4D6D66922ADCF49F289D81DC10840C295230FD35F6FA2 | reference: 3321D17E6411AC82E4D4D6D66922ADCF49F289D81DC10840C295230FD35F6FA2 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-511 - last revision: 1 height: 7254254 host: 5F445655E03F2BDF1CDC972952ADE508BE68FBDB358B1F367FAC34ABCEF299B0 | reference: 5F445655E03F2BDF1CDC972952ADE508BE68FBDB358B1F367FAC34ABCEF299B0 ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| $KUJI #561 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable FUZN Oracle Feed |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the addition of FUZN to the Kujira oracle price feed |
| $NLS #75 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Switch to Supercharged Pool for ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the ID migration from the ATOM/OSMO pool to the new concentrated liquidity counterpart on Osmosis, improving the impact on swap prices |
| $ATOM #878 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New dApps on Atom - Get Atom Airdrop! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly recommends users to refrain from clicking on any links presented in this fraudulent proposal. |
| $KUJI #562 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.1.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes permitting the Quark admins address to instantiate Code IDs 230-232 |
| $ATOM #877 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Substitute IBC light client for doravota |
| Rationale: | Hi, we're CryptoCrew, and we're behind this proposal. After a recent hard-fork of the DoraFactory chain "doravota", we are assisting the team in restoring IBC functionality with the cosmoshub and other counterparty chains. Due to the time-sensitive nature of the process, this proposal was not drafted on the Cosmoshub forum beforehand. Every IBC client-update proposal can be fully verified by validating the proposed client state against a live RPC. Please note that during the hard fork state migration on doravota, only 4 empty blocks were removed and no transactions were invalidated. The following difference in the reference is therefore expected. >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-1191 - last revision: 0 height: 2581229 host: DD1EBAA0B48F7BDED90919E0910A2A237E1637C163E7C9143204C6F5356F29E0 reference: 2AF290F2245BD4AD39C72F191E45A26A959E4FB3710D9AA4FBFDECA8136A664D <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-1204 - last revision: 0 height: 2597996 host: E2197CB826519A6117ED72BD8084AACF0D461DD8A742FC63EFAF56DB5AF7CCA3 reference: E2197CB826519A6117ED72BD8084AACF0D461DD8A742FC63EFAF56DB5AF7CCA3 ---------------------------------- ❌ subject client NOT VALID! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| $OSMO #722 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Substitute IBC light client for doravota |
| Rationale: | Hi, we're CryptoCrew, and we're behind this proposal. After a recent hard-fork of the DoraFactory chain "doravota", we are assisting the team in restoring IBC functionality with osmosis and other counterparty chains. Due to the time-sensitive nature of the process, this proposal was not drafted on the forum beforehand. Every IBC client-update proposal can be fully verified by validating the proposed client state against a live RPC. Please note that during the hard fork state migration on doravota, only 4 empty blocks were removed and no transactions were invalidated. The following difference in the reference is therefore expected. >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-2959 - last revision: 0 height: 2581229 host: DD1EBAA0B48F7BDED90919E0910A2A237E1637C163E7C9143204C6F5356F29E0 | reference: 2AF290F2245BD4AD39C72F191E45A26A959E4FB3710D9AA4FBFDECA8136A664D <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-3083 - last revision: 0 height: 2613561 host: E2197CB826519A6117ED72BD8084AACF0D461DD8A742FC63EFAF56DB5AF7CCA3 | reference: E2197CB826519A6117ED72BD8084AACF0D461DD8A742FC63EFAF56DB5AF7CCA3 ---------------------------------- ❌ subject client NOT VALID! ❌ ✅ substitute client valid! |
| $DYDX #10 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add JUP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to a parameter error |
| $DYDX #11 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add JUP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the addition of a JUP-USD perpetual market, including necessary x/prices, x/perpetuals, and x/clob parameters |
| $KUJI #563 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | (Redo) Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.1.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports permitting the Quark admins address to instantiate Code ID 233 |
| $STARS #251 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Cosmos Coin Flip update contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Cosmos Coin Flip contract update to v2 |
| $XPRT #73 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | XPRT Liquidity Bootstrapping (XLB) incentives on Dexter and Osmosis - February 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $XPRT #72 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivize stkATOM/ATOM pool on Dexter with 150k PSTAKE tokens in February 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #119 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Sommelier v7 - Multichain + Multistrategist + Protocol Revenue Distribution |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes positively on the Sommelier upgrade to v7 at block 13010200, appreciating the integration of ibc-go version 6.2.0, SDK version 0.46.14, and the replacement of tendermint with cometbft |
| $INJ #340 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Launch LINK/USDT PERP and DOGE/USDT PERP Markets, Relaunch BONK/USDT PERP Market for Injective Exchange dApps |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes for the introduction of LINK/USDT PERP and DOGE/USDT PERP markets, as well as the relaunch of BONK/USDT PERP with revised margin ratios, updated fees, and refined price/quantity ticks |
| $OSMO #723 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Osmosis-WhiteWhale interface |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the deployment of the Osmosis-WhiteWhale Pool interface contract, facilitating integration between the Osmosis pool manager and White Whale pools, marking the successful conclusion of the White Whale deployment initiative discussed in the SAIL proposal |
| $INJ #341 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Injective Native Quadratic Funding Smart Contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the audited Dora Factory Quadratic Funding contract deployment on Injective |
| $OSMO #724 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create Volume Splitting Gauges for Native WBTC pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is voting yes to create new volume splitting gauges for pools that include native WBTC |
| $FLIX #30 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Community Pool Spend |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $OSMO #725 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Incentives Adjustment for February 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favoour of adjusting |
| $SCRT #292 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New dApps on Atom - Stay up to date! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $KUJI #564 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable DYM Oracle Feed |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the integration of the DYM oracle price feed into the Kujira ecosystem |
| $XPRT #74 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade Dexter Governance admin contract to fix the pool creation bug |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the upgrade of the Dexter Governance Admin Contract to incorporate a fix for the bug related to pool creation fees |
| $XPRT #75 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Create stkDYDX/DYDX metastable pool on Dexter |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the stkDYDX/DYDX pool creation on Dexter but has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #120 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Gravity Slashing Window Param Change |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the correction to the gravity module, aimed at protecting orchestrators from being penalized by extending the slashing window |
| $SOMM #121 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-115] Proposal to Add osETH and eETH Markets to MaxMorphoETH |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of expanding the Max Morpho ETH Cellar by introducing new the osETH and weETH markets |
| $KUJI #565 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Orca v1.0.5 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Orca update to v1.0.5 |
| $INJ #342 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Trade and Earn Reward Points for Epoch Ended Jan 31 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the revision of Trade & Earn reward allocations for the epoch ending January 31, 2024, due to the identification of addresses that have exploited the system through improper behavior. |
| $BLD #68 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable stOSMO vault |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the stOSMO vault enabling on the Agoric Mainnet |
| $ATOM #879 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Atom Liquidity - ATOM Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $XPRT #76 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | PersistenceCore v10.4.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Mainnet upgrade to v10.4.1 at block 15386200, whitelisting the dYdX, stkDYDX and USDC fee denoms |
| $NLS #76 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pirin v0.5.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the upgrade of the Nolus Pirin mainnet to version 0.5.1 at block 3958000, introducing the fee grant module, fee abstraction adjustments and Nolus as ICA host network |
| $KUJI #566 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.1.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of granting the Quarks addresses instantiate permissions for Code IDs 235-237 |
| $OSMO #726 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add DYM to Transaction Fee Whitelist |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew would like to support the addition of DYM to the list of TX fee denom tokens |
| $KAVA #173 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kava Rise payouts for January 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $CRE #294 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Sunset of Crescent Network |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recommends that all CRE holders thoroughly review the debates within the Crescent commonwealth governance forum to make a decision that benefits the community at large. Given the numerous concerns highlighted in the discussion thread, we have resolved to vote against the proposal |
| $SCRT #293 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Support IBC Relayers with Fee Grants II |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is happy about the measures to compensate IBC Relayers funds, abstains though to prevent a conflict of interest as an active IBC relayer |
| $WHALE #23 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable wBTC Restaking |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes enabling the wBTC restaking with a 0.025% reward rate |
| $KUJI #567 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Deploy KUJI-factory/osmo1mlng7pz4pnyxtpq0akfwall37czyk9lukaucsrn30ameplhhshtqdvfm5c/ulvn FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew will vote yes on the revised proposal |
| $KUJI #568 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Kujira Sentinel |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the proposal to allow the Kujira Sentinel and Team Kujira code upload capabilities, emphasizing the critical role of timely emergency code updates in preserving the platform's functionality and protecting the community |
| $KUJI #569 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy factory/osmo1mlng7pz4pnyxtpq0akfwall37czyk9lukaucsrn30ameplhhshtqdvfm5c/ulvn-KUJI FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour to open the factory/osmo1mlng7pz4pnyxtpq0akfwall37czyk9lukaucsrn30ameplhhshtqdvfm5c/ulvn <> KUJI market on FIN |
| $KUJI #570 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Bow Staking v0.1.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Bow Staking upgrade to v0.1.2 |
| $KUJI #571 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy ODIN-USK FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the ODIN-USK FIN Market deployment |
| $DYDX #13 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add BNB-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in supports of adding the BNB-USD perpetual market |
| $DYDX #12 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AAVE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the AAVE-USD perp market addition |
| $KUJI #572 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Instantiate Ghost Vaults FIN Swap Adapter Contract and Fuzion Dustbuster Update |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to instantiate Ghost Vaults FIN Swap Adapter Contract and Fuzion Dustbuster Update |
| $SOMM #122 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-116] Authorize the Real Yield ETH Cellar on Arbitrum |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of authorizing Seven Seas Capital's Real Yield ETH Arbitrum Cellar |
| $BLD #69 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable stTIA vaults |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports enabling stTIA vaults on mainnet |
| $SOMM #123 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-117] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Arbitrum |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $CMDX #223 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Proposal to increase Comdex transaction fees by 25x |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to increase the Comdex tx fee parameter by 25x |
| $SOMM #123 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-118] Real Yield BTC Cellar Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $MARS #170 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Cap Increases - Osmosis Outpost |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the initiative to rise the caps on USDC, USDT, axlWBTC, axlWETH, INJ, and DYDX within the Osmosis outpost following to the stated amounts |
| $MARS #171 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | stDYDX Listing - Osmosis Outpost |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the addition of stDYDX to the Osmosis outpost of the Red Bank |
| $MARS #173 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Re-introduction of MARS staking rewards for a period of 2 months |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYDX #16 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add JTO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the JTO-USD perp market and parameter additions to create the market |
| $DYDX #15 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Min Deposit and Max Deposit Period Change |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of decrease the min_deposit to 2k & max_deposit_period parameters to 7 days |
| $OSMO #728 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin high usage Codes IDs |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the pinning of code IDs related to contracts with the most executions & calls on Osmosis to reduce TX gas fees, enhancing the UX |
| $STARS #252 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | A new public RPC experience for Stargaze |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $KUJI #573 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy LVN-MNTA FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the LVN-MNTA FIN market deployment |
| $KUJI #574 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Kujira Sentinel (pt 2) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the revised proposal to allow the Kujira Sentinel and Team Kujira code upload capabilities as stated in prop 568 plus allowing code uploaders to instantiate contracts |
| $CMDX #224 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 4 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #127 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-122] Authorize the Real Yield USD Cellar on Arbitrum |
| Rationale: | The best managed yield product in the Cosmos goes Arbitrum! CryptoCrew approves with prop #127 |
| $SOMM #126 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-121] Authorize the Yield Maxi USDT Cellar |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to authorize the Yield Maxi USDT Cellar. Bring them maxi yields! |
| $SOMM #125 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-120] Authorize the Real Yield USD 2.0 Cellar |
| Rationale: | Cryptocrew embraces the proposal to Authorize the RY USD 2.0 Cellar. LFG! |
| $DYDX #15 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Min Deposit and Max Deposit Period Change |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of decrease the min_deposit to 2k & max_deposit_period parameters to 7 days |
| $DYDX #16 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add JTO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the JTO-USD perp market and parameter additions to create the market |
| $DYDX #17 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ORDI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the ORDI-USD perp market deployment on dYdX |
| $XPRT #77 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Bootstrap XPRT/SHD Community Owned Liquidity on ShadeSwap and Dexter |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $PASG #12 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade Passage to v2.4.0 to burn unclaimed airdrop tokens |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew warmly welcomes the upgrade of the Passage mainnet to v2.4.0 at block height 7080900, including the burning of unclaimed tokens |
| $FLIX #31 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | OmniFlix Hub v3 Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Omniflix Mainnet upgrade from v2.1.0 to v3.0.0 at block height 10872800, pusgubg wasmvm to 1.5.2 and bug fixes |
| $ATOM #880 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal: Update instructions for ATOM POL 3 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the AA DAO's stewardship term extension until September '24 in order for the ATOM POL to remain deployed |
| $EVMOS #270 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Inferno 4.0 - Continuing Forge LP Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $ATOM #881 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Bitcoin Meets Atom - Enter Security Aggregation! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $OSMO #730 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Osmosis v23 Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew happily welcomes the Osmosis mainnet upgrade to v23.0.0 arriving at block height 13899375! |
| $OSMO #731 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Superfluid Staking for USDC pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of enabling SFS on pools #1369, #1221, #1263 and #1464 |
| $OSMO #732 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Superfluid Staking for USDT pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also supports enabling SFS on the USDT pools #1076, #1077 and #1465 |
| $OSMO #733 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Limit Epoch Calculations for small distributions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the effort to change the incentive distribution mechanism (setting a min distribution param of 0.01 OSMO) within the proposal in order to decrease the epoch block's time |
| $KUJI #575 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase mintcaps of stATOM, WBTC, wstETH, and stOSMO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of increasing the mint caps of stATOM, WBTC, wstETH and stOSMO |
| $INJ #345 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin Helix Grid Trading Strategy Code (ID 462) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to pin the contract with code ID 462 |
| $GRAV #227 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Recover user funds stuck in community pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $INJ #346 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Upload xNinja.Tech Controller Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew would like to support the communities wish to upload the xNinja.Tech Controller Contract to the Injective Mainnet, abstains though due to the fact that there are no code audits to be found within the xNinja-Labs GitHub repository or homepage. |
| $SOMM #128 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-125] Real Yield ETH Cellar Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #129 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-126] Turbo EETH V2 Cellar Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #130 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-127] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield USD Arbitrum |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #131 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Community Pool Funding of SOMM Staking Rewards until June |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $ATOM #882 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ - New dApps on Atom ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $WHALE #24 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.1.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes abstain due to a yet unsolved dispute about the Notional Team's vested shares |
| $DYDX #18 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add EOS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the EOS-USD perp market addition to the DYDX exchange |
| $DYDX #19 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | dYdX Ecosystem Development Program |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYDX #20 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ICP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the ICP-USD perp market addition on the dYdX exchange |
| $DYDX #21 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add DYM-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of adding the DYM-USD perp market on the dYdX exchange |
| $DYDX #22 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add STRK-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the STRK-USD perp market addition to the dYdX exchange |
| $KAVA #174 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎 USD₮ Airdrop ✅ - New Atom Liquidity ⚛️ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $ARCH #36 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reduce the Minimum Price of Gas (MPOG) for the Archway Network from 900 Gway to 140 Gway |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of reducing the minimum price of gas for the Archway Network to 140 gway to make Archway more compatible with competing networks |
| $ARCH #37 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Transfer 6M ARCH to Liquidity Council mSig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $STARS #253 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Stargaze Live Auction v1.0.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Stargaze Live Auction contract upgrade to v1.0.2 at code ID 200 |
| $STARS #254 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Stargaze Fair Burn v1.1.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Stargaze Fair Burn contract migration to v1.1.0 at code ID 201 |
| $SOMM #132 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add Base chain configuration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of adding the Base chain configuration to enable Sommelier to communicate with Base via the Axelar Network |
| $SOMM #133 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add BNB chain configuration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports adding the BNB chain configuration to enable Sommelier to communicate with Base via the Axelar Network |
| $SOMM #134 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add Optimism chain configuration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the addition of the Optimism chain configuration for Sommelier to communicate with the Optimism chain via Axelar |
| $SOMM #135 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add Polygon PoS chain configuration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Polygon PoS chain config addition in order for Sommelier to communicate with the Polygon PoS chain via the Axelar Network |
| $KUJI #576 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase mintcaps of stATOM, WBTC, wstETH, and stOSMO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the mint caps increasal of stATOM, WBTC, wstETH and stOSMO according to the proposal |
| $MARS #174 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Whitelist Incentive Denoms |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to enable incentives for Red Bank user deposits in markets involving MARS, NTRN, and OSMO by whitelisting these tokens in the Mars Incentives contract across Neutron and Osmosis outposts. |
| $MARS #175 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Off-Chain Routes in Swapper - Osmosis Outpost |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the proposal to enhance the Osmosis platform by revising the Credit Manager, Swapper, and Rewards Collector contracts for more dynamic and efficient asset swapping, adapting to changing liquidity conditions |
| $CMDX #225 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Proposal to Implement CMDX transaction fee burn mechanism on-chain. |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the initiative to burn half of the CMDX transaction fees on Comdex, redistributing the remainder to stakers after essential fee allocations |
| $C4E #8 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade v1.3.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the C4E v1.3.1 upgrade including advancements in token economics and the strategic burn of 100M C4E tokens before listing |
| $KUJI #577 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Unstake.fi - Quark instantiate permissions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of the proposal to grant Delegate contract permissions to Quark Controllers for enhanced Unstake.fi functionality by whitelisting the three stated addresses |
| $KUJI #579 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | NTRN<>KUJI token swap deal and NTRN/USK levered LP building |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $OSMO #734 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Whitelist Address for Astroport deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the initiative to create an Astroport Outpost on Osmosis, introducing PCL (Passive Concentrated Liquidity) pools by whitelisting the Astroport Builder Multisig address for Oak Security audited code uploads and authorizing the use of the PCL code ID |
| $OSMO #735 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Superfluid Staking for WBTC pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes enabling Superfluid Staking on the following WBTC Pools #1432, #1433 and #1434 featuring different fee rates |
| $OSMO #736 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Superfluid Staking in Lower Fee equivalent pools of existing approvals |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces enabling Superfluid Staking on the following lower spread factor OSMO pairing pools #1347, #1265, #1399, #1400, #1281, #1477 and #1430 |
| $OSMO #737 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Authorize Uptime Incentives Parameters list |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of implementing a range of uptimes for incentive gauges on Osmosis, leading to a more adaptable and responsive liquidity ecosystem, especially regarding Passive Concentrated Liquidity pools |
| $JUNO #339 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Development Election: Kopeboy |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts for neutrality in the JUNO community's elections for development and operations roles, abstaining due to a lack of familiarity with the candidates and their histories |
| $JUNO #338 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Development Election: André |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts for neutrality in the JUNO community's elections for development and operations roles, abstaining due to a lack of familiarity with the candidates and their histories |
| $JUNO #337 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Development Election: Ray Raspberry |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts for neutrality in the JUNO community's elections for development and operations roles, abstaining due to a lack of familiarity with the candidates and their histories |
| $JUNO #336 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Operations Election: Ninjaxan |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts for neutrality in the JUNO community's elections for development and operations roles, abstaining due to a lack of familiarity with the candidates and their histories |
| $JUNO #335 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Operations Election: Lil D |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts for neutrality in the JUNO community's elections for development and operations roles, abstaining due to a lack of familiarity with the candidates and their histories |
| $DYDX #23 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add FET-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the ICP-USD perp market addition on the dYdX exchange |
| $SCRT #294 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Support Team Funding Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $KUJI #578 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase MNTA Mint cap |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the USK mint cap increasal for MNTA to 1M USK |
| $INJ #347 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | iLend v1.3 smart contract upgrade for LST assets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the iLend v1.3 smart contract upgrade for LST assets, which introduces enhanced admin capabilities for adding new supply and borrow markets, along with an improved liquidation function that opens up liquidation opportunities to all users |
| $INJ #348 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Trade & Earn Multiplier Updates on Injective Exchange dApps |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the advancement to boost T&E multipliers to 10x for the mentioned perp futures markets on Injective and resetting other market multipliers |
| $KUJI #580 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Unstake.fi - Eris ampMNTA permissions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is favorable towards the initiative to authorize Delegate contract rights to the ampMNTA Controller by permitting the four addresses mentioned in the proposal |
| $NLS #78 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin New Contract Codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees to the pinning of newly added v0.5.1 contracts IDs to the Nolus Pirin Mainnet |
| $NLS #79 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Temporarily Decrease Voting Period |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the proposed reduction of the voting timeframe to 1 day, aiming for a rapid execution of the upcoming Noble USDC protocol contracts on the Nolus Pirin mainnet |
| $NLS #80 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.5.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the smart contract version upgrade to v0.5.1 on the Nolus Pirin mainnet, including the removal of outdated DEX support and the addition of Noble USDC lending pools |
| $LUNA #4803 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | A 5% Global Minimum Commission for Validators |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the implementation of a 5% global minimum commission for validators |
| $LUNA #4802 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | ampROAR Alliance Asset Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the addition of ampROAR to the Terra blockchain as an Alliance asset, enabling staking with Terra validators for LUNA rewards |
| $DYM #2 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase the Active Validator Set to 125 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of enlarging the active validator set to 125 |
| $INJ #349 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Trade and Earn Reward Points for Epoch Ended Feb 14 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the revision of Trade & Earn reward allocations for the epoch ending February 14, 2024, due to the identification of addresses that have exploited the system |
| $INJ #350 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload NFT Injstaking Contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew withholds support for uploading the Injstaking contract to the Injective Mainnet, citing the absence of essential details regarding the code, lack of code audits, insufficient project discourse, and If user assets are protected or exposed to threats |
| $INJ #351 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 19 February 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYM #3 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Parameter Change: Reducing the value of TxSizeCostPerByte 100 --> 10 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the initiative to set the auth.TxSizeCostPerByte to 10 gas units per byte, lowering the number of gas units required per transaction, thereby reducing transaction costs, which is expected to positively impact IBC-transactions |
| $ATOM #883 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Cosmos $ATOM Fork ⚛️ - AtomOne is READY! ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $OSMO #738 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Allow Cancellation of Autonomy Limit Orders |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew commends the Osmosis Support Lab for their code revisions, improving UX by changing a parameter, fixing the order creation / cancellation related bug |
| $DYDX #24 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add WOO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the WOO-USD perp market deployment to the dYdX exchange a |
| $DYDX #25 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add PYTH-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the PYTH-USD perp market addition on the dYdX exchange |
| $DYDX #26 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add BONK-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of adding the BONK-USD market to dYdX assets list |
| $ARCH #38 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Archway v6.0.0 software upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the initiative to transition the Archway codebase to version v6.0.0 at the specified block height 3554500, including significant updates like wasmd to v0.45.0 and cosmos-sdk to 0.47.7, |
| $WHALE #25 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.1.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains due to a yet unsolved dispute about the Notional Team's vested shares |
| $EVMOS #271 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Active Precompiles |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to update the active precompiles on Evmos |
| $OSMO #739 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase Tapering Factor on Incentives system |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for raising the tapering factor in the incentives system to expedite the alignment of incentives with target liquidity levels, going into effect with the next incentives proposal in March |
| $OSMO #740 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add 0.01% fee pools to Volume Splitting Groups - OSMO/ETH, TIA/USDC, OSMO/USDC, OSMO/USDT |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is in favor of establishing new volume-splitting groups that add 0.01% spread pools to the 15 mentioned incentivized pairings |
| $SOMM #136 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-119, 123, 124] Authorize the Turbo rsETH, ezETH, and RYETH 2.0 Cellars |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew affirms the initiation of the Seven Seas Capital's Turbo rsETH, Turbo ezETH, and RYETH 2.0 Cellars on Sommelier |
| $SOMM #137 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-128] Turbo RSETH Cellar Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $SOMM #138 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-129] Turbo EZETH Cellar Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $KUJI #582 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Build-up a SHD/USK Levered LP position with the SHD received from the token swap deal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $INJ #352 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Queue System and FCFS Mechanism for Rewards conversion |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the introduction of a structured queue and first-come-first-serve-approach for xNinja game economy's $ELEM to $XNJ token conversions, designed to manage token supply and combat inflation |
| $KUJI #583 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Deploy DOKI-ODIN FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew suggests a pairing with a major token like USK, KUJI or similar |
| $DYDX #27 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AGIX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the AGIX-USD perp market addition to the dYdX exchange |
| $DYDX #28 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add RNDR-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the RNDR-USD perpetual market deployment on the dYdX exchange |
| $NLS #81 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of adjusting the Osmosis axlUSDC Oracle swap tree on the Nolus mainnet, enabling the protocol to use specified paths for streamlining lease-related transactions |
| $SOMM #140 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | [SIPS-131] Authorize the Real Yield ETH Cellar on Optimism |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal for Seven Seas Capital's Real Yield ETH Optimism Cellar, offering superior organic ETH yields on Optimism |
| $SOMM #139 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | [SIPS-130] Co-Incentives Proposal for Turbo CRVUSD |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $AXL #193 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Axelar regional communities Feb24-Jul24 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $DYDX #29 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add STX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the STX-USD perp market addition on the dYdX mainnet |
| $XPRT #78 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create XPRT/SHD pool on Dexter |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to create a 50/50 weighted XPRT/SHD pool on Dexter |
| $ARCH #39 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Fast, Reliable and Scalable Public RPC Powered by Lava |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $KUJI #584 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase stATOM Mint Cap |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a positive vote regarding the stATOM mint cap raise to 2M USK |
| $KUJI #585 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase wBTC Mint Cap |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to increase the USK mint cap of wBTC to 1.35M |
| $KUJI #586 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase wstETH Mint Cap |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the wstETH Mint Cap increasal to 1.35M USK |
| $NLS #82 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.5.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the transition of the latest Neutron Astroport Protocol contracts to v0.5.2 on the Nolus Pirin mainnet |
| $NLS #83 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin New Contract Codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to pin contract IDs from v0.5.2 and Noble USDC protocol contracts from v0.5.1 on Nolus Pirin mainnet |
| $OSMO #741 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Address for Banana Vaults Deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew stands against the deployment of unaudited code on the Osmosis Mainnet, prioritizing network safety and integrity |
| $ATOM #884 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ - New Cosmos $ATOM Fork is ready! ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises all users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to unsecured or malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy. |
| $OSMO #742 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Fix white-whale<>osmosis cosmwasm pool interface |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is against supporting proposals that have not been debated in the governance forum and are missing essential details about CosmWasm code or its audits |
| $CMDX #226 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 5 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| $NLS #84 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the Oracle swap tree adjustment for Osmosis Noble USDC, enabling optimized lease-related transactions |
| $NLS #85 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register the First Price Feeder in the Noble USDC Osmosis Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the integration of the first price feeder into the Osmosis Noble USDC Oracle |
| $NLS #86 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register the Second Price Feeder in the Noble USDC Osmosis Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the integration of the seond price feeder into the Osmosis Noble USDC Oracle |
| $NLS #87 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register the Third Price Feeder in the Noble USDC Osmosis Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the addition of the third price feeder to the Noble USDC Osmosis Oracle |
| $NLS #88 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register the Fourth Price Feeder in the Noble USDC Osmosis Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew confirms the registration of the fourth price feeder for the Noble USDC Osmosis Oracle |
| $NLS #89 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register the Fifth Price Feeder in the Noble USDC Osmosis Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew acknowledges the setup of the fifth price feeder for the Noble USDC Osmosis Oracle |
| $C4E #9 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | The Governance Mission 2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recommends to all our stakers to participate in voting on the proposal to fulfill the governance mission for the Chain4Energy Stakedrop |
| $DYDX #30 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add INJ-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the INJ-USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX mainnet |
| $XPRT #79 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivization of Dexter pools with XPRT rewards for March 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
