CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update April 2025
6. May 2025
Dear Community,
We are delighted to share an update on our governance activities for April 2025. This month, we diligently screened more than 35 networks and participated in voting on 88 proposals across 22 different chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators.
Your delegations allow us to maintain the high quality of this service and effectively represent our collective interests. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your own preferences on any active proposal. We sincerely appreciate your trust and support.
Kind regards, the CryptoCrew Team ✅
| INJECTIVE #515 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Decrease hourly funding rate cap for various RWA markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the proposed reduction of the hourly funding rate cap from 0.0625% to 0.00275% for iMCD/USDT PERP, iMSTR/USDT PERP, iGOOGL/USDT PERP, iTSLA/USDT PERP, iHOOD/USDT PERP, iCOIN/USDT PERP, AIX/USDT PERP, and from 0.02% to 0.00275% for XAU/USDT PERP, XAG/USDT PERP, GBP/USDT PERP, EUR/USDT PERP, TRADFI/USDT PERP, TTI/USDT PERP, and iNVDA/USDT PERP |
| INJECTIVE #514 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Decrease hourly funding rate cap for various RWA markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to the updated and expedited proposal #515, which includes one more market and makes #514 obsolete by ending before #514 |
| COSMOS HUB #993 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Neutron and the Hub: A new chapter |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports Neutron’s transition to a sovereign network and recognizes the long-term value this proposal aims to bring to the Cosmos Hub and ATOM ecosystem. However, we are abstaining from this vote in line with our policy of not participating in community pool spend proposals. This stance, established in April 2023, is meant to avoid conflicts of interest—especially in cases like this, where we are among the named recipients of token allocations. We encourage our delegators to review the proposal and vote according to their own views. |
| TERRA2 #4836 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | TLA Optimization - Relocate non-LUNA Pools to SA & Elevate LUNA Pools from SA |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| AKASH NETWORK #286 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Akash Community Programs: Q2 2025 Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| OMNIFLIX #55 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Adjustment of FLIX Token Inflation Parameters |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome.* |
| NOLUS #285 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew concurs with the proposed updates to the Osmosis USDC Oracle swap tree, supporting the integration of NIL and XION as margin long assets on the Nolus Pirin Mainnet, and optimizing the route for TIA via the TIA/USDC pool, improving efficiency |
| OSMOSIS #916 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Monthly BTC Purchase: March 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| OSMOSIS #915 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Monthly OSMO Taker Fee Burn: March 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the monthly OSMO taker fee burn of April 2025, following the communities decision on proposal 903, allocating 50% of the collected OSMO taker fees to a burn address instead of distributing it to stakers |
| OSMOSIS #917 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Valence Deployment Address to Upload Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes NO due to the proposal being erroneous and a corrected version, Proposal #918, currently open for voting |
| OSMOSIS #918 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | CORRECTED Whitelist Valence’s Deployment Address to Upload Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew maintains a cautious policy on general whitelisting, thus we cannot support the authorization of the Valence developer's wallet. However, we are open to consider supporting the deployment of Zellic-audited Valence contracts if they are presented as individual proposals |
| OSMOSIS #919 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Osmosis to Become a Bitcoin Secured Network |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the evolution of Osmosis into a Bitcoin Secured Network, aligning with the communties decision stated with Proposal #437 to integrate Babylon. This development is a natural step towards strengthening the network’s capabilities and enriching both the Osmosis and Babylon ecosystems |
| KUJIRA #697 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Remove assets from Oracle Feed |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew favors the removal of mentioned assets AQLA, CTK, FUZN, JUNO, KART, NSTK, RLB, SHD, SOMM, STARS, UNI and WINK from the oracle price feed |
| ORAICHAIN #313 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Mint Module new inflation_rate and blocks_per_year |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| MANTRA ZONE #12 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v4 Mainnet Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the Mantrachain upgrade to v4, arriving with block #4428500, adding support for Interchain Accounts, updating ibc-go from v8.6.1 to v8.7.0, bumping cosmos-sdk from v0.50.12-v3-mantra-1 to v0.50.13-v3-mantra-1 and more |
| KAVA #200 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kava Rise Payouts March 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| JUNO #362 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Juno Roadmap: Proposal 3 - Reduction of the Validator Set |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opts out of voting for the reduction in active validators on the Juno mainnet |
| OSMOSIS #920 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Osmosis v29 Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Osmosis Mainnet upgrade to v29.0.0, landing with block #33187000, delivering pfm v8.1.1, wasmd v0.53.2, ibcgo v8.6.1, ibc-hooks v0.0.19, and further dependencies to the latest versions |
| AKASH NETWORK #287 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Akash Community Activities: Q2 2025 Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| OSMOSIS #921 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | OSMO LST Support: Pryzm |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| PERSISTENCE #134 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Disable Validator Bond Factor in LSM Module |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees with the proposal to disable the Validator Bond Factor in the LSM module, aiming to remove friction from re-delegation, liquid staking, and undelegation processes |
| XION #29 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Deploy Rand Generator and Roulette Smart Contracts for Blockx. |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew refrains from supporting proposals that involve gambling use cases or present potential risks to user funds |
| OSMOSIS #922 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Unwind MNTA/OSMO Liquidity Pair and Return Assets to MantaDAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| PASSAGE #14 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase Minimum Deposit for Governance Proposals to 100,000 PASG |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the Passage mainnet governance deposit fee raise from 20k to 100k $PASG in order to prevent spam proposals |
| PASSAGE #15 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Increase Minimum Validator Commission Rate to 5% |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is aligned with the goal of establishing a minimum validator commission rate of 5% to promote long-term sustainability and validator accountability. However, we abstain from voting due to the financial implications and to avoid a conflict of interest, as this proposal directly affects validator earnings and reward distribution, leaving the decision to the Passage community |
| PASSAGE #16 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase Minimum Gas Price to 12.5 uPASG |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the increase of the minimum gas price from 0.001 uPASG to 12.5 |
| PASSAGE #17 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Multisig Owners for Team Wallets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is in favor of the proposed adjustments to the team's multisig wallets, which will streamline operations and enhance operational effectiveness |
| XION #31 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Adjust inflation for faster blocks |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome.* |
| XION #33 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update and pin account code ids to 5 and 55 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes regarding the pinning of the mentioned account code ids to the Xion mainnet |
| INJECTIVE #516 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | DojoSwap Atomic Swap |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew declines to support the DojoSwap Atomic Swap contract deployment proposal because it lacks the presentation of an independent audit, disclosure about the source code’s openness, detailed descriptions of the contracts involved, and information about the development team |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #237 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| PASSAGE #18 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Passage Software Upgrade proposal - v2.5.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew acknowledges the upgrade of the Passage Mainnet to v2.5.0 at block #13331493. However, in consistence with our policy on community pool spend proposals, we choose to abstain due to the proposed bonus airdrop for StrangeClan NFT holders |
| AKASH NETWORK #288 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | AEP 32 - Provider Console |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| JUNO #363 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | New Delegation Program |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #239 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | dYdX Treasury SubDAO Ad-Hoc Update & Proposal #2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the proposed changes regarding the dYdX Treasury SubDAO |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #238 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | dYdX Treasury SubDAO Ad-Hoc Update & Proposal #1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of the proposed changes regarding the dYdX Treasury SubDAO (amending dYdX Treasury SubDAO Foundations Articles of Association, replacing the SubDAO Foundation Director and expanding buyback program venues) |
| NOLUS #286 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin Contract Codes (v0.8.7 Currencies) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports pinning the v0.8.7 contract IDs of the Leaser, LPP, Oracle, Profit, Reserve, and Lease modules on the Nolus Pirin mainnet to reduce tx gas consumption |
| SECRET NETWORK #320 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the rollout of the Secret Network v1.18 upgrade at block #19236506, featuring MRENCLAVE sealing, new governance proposal types, and emergency upgrade functionality |
| MANTRA ZONE #13 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | OMies Seeking 1,000,000 OM Grant for Community and Future App Development |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| NOLUS #287 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the removal of OM from the Oracle swap tree and supports the restructuring of swap routes to enhance efficiency and performance in margin trading on the Nolus protocol |
| NOLUS #288 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin Contract Codes (v0.8.7 Currencies) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew favors the code pinning of the six newly stored code IDs related to v0.8.7 of the Leaser, LPP, Oracle, Profit, Reserve and Lease protocol smart contracts from the Osmosis Noble USDC integration to the Nolus Pirin Mainnet |
| NOLUS #289 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.8.7 (Currencies) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the addition of BABY and dNTRN as margin-longable assets on the Nolus protocol and supports the associated smart contract migration of the Osmosis Noble USDC and Neutron Astroport Noble USDC markets and swap routes |
| STARGAZE #316 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v16 Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Stargaze upgrade to v16, arriving at block #19319579, delivering the latest versions of CosmWasm and IBC to the mainnet |
| NOLUS #290 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Trees (Osmosis and Neutron Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the addition of BABY and dNTRN to the Oracle and welcomes the corresponding swap tree optimizations across Osmosis and Neutron for improved margin trade execution on Nolus |
| AGORIC #92 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | reset MintLimit to 500K IST in PSMs for USDC, USDT |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a positive vote on the parameter fix, re-establishing the intended 500k IST MintLimit for the USDC and USDT PSMs (Peg Stabilized Modules) after the v19 upgrade error |
| ORAICHAIN #314 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade Oraichain to v0.50.10 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew expresses support for the Oraichain v0.50.10 upgrade arriving with block #57862182 and fixing the gasless bug, but must abstain from voting as the inclusion of a mint module inflation rate adjustment falls under our abstention policy on incentive- and reward-structure related changes |
| SECRET NETWORK #321 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the expedited proposal regarding the rollout of the Secret Network v1.18 upgrade at block #19237623, featuring MRENCLAVE sealing, new governance proposal types, and emergency upgrade functionality |
| SECRET NETWORK #320 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew updates it's vote to no due to the expedited proposal #321 rolling out the planned upgrade to v1.18 |
| INJECTIVE #518 | |
| Vote: | |
| Title: | Injective Lyora Mainnet Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Injective Lyora upgrade to v1.15.0 at block #114590000, introducing a dynamic fee model, advanced transaction processing, and multiple performance and security enhancements |
| XION #34 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Software Upgrade v18 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the Xion Mainnet upgrade to v18 with the arrival of block #7020000, introducing new integration tests for 'XionClientEvent', a new test 'TestXionClientEvent' and 'TestXionMinimumFeeDefault', an updated 'govRouter' in 'app/app.go' to include a new route for the 'feeabs' module as well as the update of the fee abstraction module to v8.0.2 and a new command 'NewEmitArbitraryDataCmd' in 'x/xion/client/cli/tx.go' |
| XION #35 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Set minimum commissions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew aligns with establishing a 5% minimum commission rate for validators ('min_commission_rate' parameter to "0.050000000000000000" uxion) on the Xion mainnet, promoting validator sustainability and accountability |
| XION #36 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust slashing missed blocks threshold |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of the slashing window adjustments on the XION mainnet, rebalancing the downtime monitoring window to better align with the chain’s faster block production rate introduced with proposal #31 |
| XION #37 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Deploy Roulette Smart Contracts for Blockx. |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not endorse proposals related to gambling applications or smart contracts that might jeopardize user funds |
| INJECTIVE #519 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Settle OM/USDT Perpetuals Across Injective DEXs |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the settlement of the OM/USDT PERP market to ensure price finality and closure of outstanding positions based on current oracle data |
| OSMOSIS #923 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Whitelist Union's Deployment Address to Upload Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the whitelisting of Union Deployment Accounts to upload contracts, based on our long‑term technical collaboration and confidence in the Union team. |
| BABYLON #8 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reduce the unbonding fee to 30 sats/vByte |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports proposal 8 to reduce the BTC unbonding fee to 30 sats/vByte |
| INJECTIVE #520 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | DojoSwap Upgraded CW404 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the deployment of DojoSwap's CW404 contract upgrade, citing the absence of a formal governance thread, lack of audit verification for the upgraded contract, and concerns over the unlock functionality, which implies direct access to user-held tokens and could pose risks to user funds if the code is flawed or malicious |
| KUJIRA #698 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Send KUJI and other assets in the CP to the Kujira Team Ops wallet for security reasons |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| OMNIFLIX #56 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy Channel Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew favors the deployment of OmniFlix Channel Contracts, bringing a Web3-native creator experience through programmable channel logic, content tokenization, collaboration toolkits, and on-chain engagement tools |
| AKASH NETWORK #289 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Akash Accelerate 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| XION #39 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Extend Mainnet Voting Period |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the extension of the voting period on the Xion Mainnet from 24 to 96 hours, allowing the community and validators more time to properly review and respond to governance proposals |
| XION #38 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add $USDC IBC denomination to Host Zone |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to activate Noble USDC support for fee abstraction, enhancing interoperability |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #240 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| NOLUS #291 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Increase Gas Fees for Alternative Denoms |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the principle of reinforcing the utility of NLS through a more robust fee structure. However, as this proposal directly impacts staking yields, we abstain from voting to avoid a potential conflict of interest and defer the decision to the Nolus community |
| INJECTIVE #521 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for the epoch ended 14 April 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| PERSISTENCE #135 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT rewards for May 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. * |
| OSMOSIS #924 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Expand Supercharged Quote Asset list - April 2025 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports expanding the Supercharged pool quote asset list by adding ATONE, BABY, BNB (Alloy), dNTRN, dTIA, DYDX (Alloy), DYM (Alloy), ICP, INIT, LBTC.lom.atom, NIL, PRYZM, stINJ, solvBTC.atom, XION, and XRP (Alloy) |
| STARGAZE #307 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Kaka Labs Dev Address |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the whitelisting of the Kaka Labs deployer wallet, citing concerns over closed-source code, lack of disclosed audits, and adherence to our cautious stance on general whitelisting |
| ORAICHAIN #315 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade Oraichain to v0.50.11 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the Oraichain Mainnet upgrade to v0.50.11, enabling cosmos-evm support, block streaming to Redpanda, and fixes to gas simulations for gas-less contracts. |
| AGORIC #93 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | #93 Signaling Proposal for the Strategic Sunsetting of Inter Protocol |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the coordinated deprecation of Inter Protocol, including IST minting, Vault operations, and the PSM, to responsibly conclude the stablecoin ecosystem by mid-2025. |
| AXELAR #300 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload XRPLMultisigProver contract v1.1.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the deployment of the XRPLMultisigProver contract v1.1.2 due to missing information about code audits and source-status |
| AXELAR #301 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload XRPLGateway contract v1.1.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew refrains from supporting the XRPLGateway contract v1.1.2 upload due to missing information about code audits and source-status |
| AXELAR #302 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload XRPLVotingVerifier contract v1.1.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew withholds support for the XRPLGateway contract v1.1.2 upload due to a lack of clarity regarding audit results and the source code's openness. |
| AXELAR #303 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Gateway for xrpl |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the addition of the XRPL gateway address to the Router contract, facilitating proper integration |
| MILKYWAY #13 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Staking, distribution and mint params change |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an upgraded proposal |
| MILKYWAY #15 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add vesting accounts to x/investors module |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| MILKYWAY #16 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Mint params change |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| AXELAR #305 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Authorize Multisig Prover for xrpl |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees with authorizing the XRPL multisig prover in the Multisig contract to maintain proper routing |
| AXELAR #306 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create pool for xrpl Voting Verifier |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew favors setting up a separate pool to isolate and manage XRPL voting verification |
| AXELAR #307 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create pool for xrpl in Axelar Multisig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports initializing the XRPL pool to manage Axelar Multisig operations |
| AXELAR #308 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register xrpl on ITS Hub |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew confirms XRPL inclusion in the ITS Hub for coordinated asset handling |
| AXELAR #309 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Gateway for xrpl-evm |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew acknowledges the strategic alignment behind registering the XRPL-EVM gateway for cross-chain operability. |
| AXELAR #310 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Multisig Prover for xrpl-evm |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew considers the integration of XRPL-EVM’s multisig prover with the Coordinator crucial for relay verification logic |
| AXELAR #311 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Authorize Multisig Prover for xrpl-evm |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew provisions the multisig contract to include XRPL-EVM’s prover, enhancing transaction validation paths |
| AXELAR #312 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create pool for xrpl-evm in voting verifier |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to enable XRPL-EVM participation in interchain verification via a Voting Verifier pool |
| AXELAR #313 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create pool for xrpl-evm in axelar multisig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew greenlights XRPL-EVM pool entry into Axelar's multisig |
| AXELAR #314 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register xrpl-evm on ITS Hub |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew enables xrpl-evm onboarding to the ITS Hub to expand cross-chain utility |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #241 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. * |
| * Rationale shortened for improved readability |
