CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update June 2024
2. July 2024
Valued Community, we’re pleased to update you on our June 2024 governance activities, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 161 votes across 26 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
| KUJIRA #630 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | (Fix) Update Instantiate Permissions: Quark qcAQLA |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against uploading the AQLA contract due to missing information about the code, governance forum discussion and security implications regarding user funds |
| STARGAZE #274 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Consensus Params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the consensus parameter updates of max_bytes to 5242880 and max_gas to 150000000 in order to limit blocks to max. 5mb |
| STARGAZE #273 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin and Migrate Marketplace Contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the marketplace contract migration and pinning in order to improve 1-click trading experience |
| CRESCENT #320 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | New Meme Coin: ATOS 🧪 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #321 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | BUY New Meme Coin: ATOS 💎 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #322 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Support: New Meme Coin: ATOS 💎 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #323 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #324 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #325 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #326 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #327 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #328 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #329 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #330 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #331 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #332 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #333 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #334 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| EVMOS #293 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - Get $3000 Today! |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| TERRA2 #4813 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Terra Liquidity Alliance Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| SECRET NETWORK #302 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Expired Comdex Client |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the recovery of the IBC channel between Secret and Comdex after successfully verifying the validity of the clients >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-125 - last revision: 1 height: 10970597 host: 72E83AB50610D21D87893D194997BA1FFD0E57C4A785AB92D331438543C71985 | reference: 72E83AB50610D21D87893D194997BA1FFD0E57C4A785AB92D331438543C71985 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-205 - last revision: 1 height: 13388408 host: A1C1B828CDEEDD7B1FDA9AA42D9FD8ACB5196D74C97D963C298A367E8554A4C0 | reference: A1C1B828CDEEDD7B1FDA9AA42D9FD8ACB5196D74C97D963C298A367E8554A4C0 ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| LUM NETWORK #107 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade core v1.6.7 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the LUM Network upgrade to v1.6.7 with block #13241000 |
| INJECTIVE #402 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload DEGA Minter Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes DEGA's efforts to introduce their code to the Injective Mainnet but votes against it, due to the inability to locate their GitHub, unclear status on whether the code is open or closed source, and lack of information on whether the code has undergone an unbiased third-party audit |
| INJECTIVE #401 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload DEGA Collection Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes DEGA's efforts to introduce their code to the Injective Mainnet but votes against it, due to the inability to locate their GitHub, unclear status on whether the code is open or closed source, and lack of information on whether the code has undergone an unbiased third-party audit |
| COMDEX #232 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Revive ComdexBand IBC client> |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the recovery of the IBC channel between Comdex and Band after successfully verifying the validity of the clients >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-81 - last revision: 0 height: 29377791 host: CE6ACBC07BC7726A8CCBE026FF6B42ED30D6C530A0C3BCD7888B3D9A5889650B | reference: CE6ACBC07BC7726A8CCBE026FF6B42ED30D6C530A0C3BCD7888B3D9A5889650B <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-207 - last revision: 0 height: 29508473 host: 94F0A8DD53F7E05DC8B49DD4396775F8A8EE1A2448AAD6C7CFFF022970F7BA7A | reference: 94F0A8DD53F7E05DC8B49DD4396775F8A8EE1A2448AAD6C7CFFF022970F7BA7A ✅ subject client client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
| KUJIRA #631 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | MantaDAO Migration: Update Contract Admin Addresses |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to grant the Kujira team's Protocol Admin wallet contract admin authority over the MantaDAO cw4 and rewards contracts |
| DYMENSION #18 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | AMM Incentive #4 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #926 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal - Expedited Software Upgrade Proposals |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of setting the ExpeditedVotingPeriod, ExpeditedThreshold and ExpeditedMinDeposit parameters like proposed in order to allow for expedited SoftwareUpgrades on the Cosmos Hub beginning with the next Cosmos Hub upgrade |
| CRESCENT #342 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Do Kwon 🌕 IN PRISON 2024 ️👮 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #341 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Do Kwon 🌕 IN PRISON 2024 ️👮🚨 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #340 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Do Kwon 🌕 IN PRISON 2024 ️👮🚨 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #339 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎LUNA Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #338 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎LUNA Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #337 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎LUNA Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #336 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎LUNA Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #335 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | 💎LUNA Airdrop ⭐ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| EVMOS #294 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | $1,200,000.00 Evmos Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #60 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Launch Incentives - Season 4 Distribution |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| NOLUS #121 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Astroport) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes positive regarding the Neutron axlUSDC oracle swap tree for DYDX |
| OSMOSIS #787 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Incentives Adjustment for June 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees to the Osmosis Liquidity Incentive adjustments according to prop #578 and keep stable/OSMO as well as stable/ATOM incentives static as proposed |
| NOLUS #122 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Leaser Parameters (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Leaser smart contract modifications according to the proposal, getting into effect with new leases |
| NOLUS #123 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Leaser Parameters (Astroport axlUSDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to modify the Leaser smart contract for the Astroport axlUSDC integration on Nolus Pirin according to the proposal, getting into effect with new leases |
| INJECTIVE #403 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Start.Cooking Upload Contract |
| Rationale: | While CryptoCrew values start.cooking's efforts to introduce their contracts to the Injective mainnet, we vote against it, citing inadequate advance notice in the governance forum and missing details about independent code audits and the source code's openness |
| INJECTIVE #404 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Start.Cooking Upload Factory Contract |
| Rationale: | While CryptoCrew values start.cooking's efforts to introduce their contracts to the Injective mainnet, we vote against it, citing inadequate advance notice in the governance forum and missing details about independent code audits and the source code's openness |
| KUJIRA #632 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Unstake: v1.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to update Unstake to v1.0 and granting Entropic CW1 address admin and permissions |
| KUJIRA #633 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.2.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Quark contract update to v1.2.0 and granting the Entropic CW1 address instantiate permissions |
| PERSISTENCE #109 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Param Change: Inflation Params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against halving the existing XPRT inflation parameter |
| OMNIFLIX #39 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Community Pool Spend |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| TERRA2 #4814 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Sayve Protocol Community Grant |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| STARGAZE #275 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Update Params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the proposal because it lacks essential details about the identities of the address owners who will be granted code upload permissions, as well as insufficient information or discussion on the governance forum, Discord, or other platforms |
| MARS #193 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | wstETH Listing - Osmosis Outpost |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the listing of the canonically recognized asset wstETH on the Red Bank's Osmosis outpost |
| KUJIRA #663 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Instantiate Config: Quark v1.2.0 Rewards |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Entropic CW1 address permission as stated at proposal #633 |
| CHIHUAHUA #76 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create Alliance: ampGash |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of creating the ampGash Alliance between Chihuahua and the ASH DAO - WOOF |
| PERSISTENCE #110 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Whitelist Skip API team address for the Persistence DEX integration |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes whitelisting the Skip API team address for deployment and management of the Skip API system (ibc.fun) and Skip Router contracts on the Persistence One chain |
| OSMOSIS #788 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Gelotto Address for PampIT + Games |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting Gelottos address to deploy smart contracts to the Osmosis Mainnet without further governance approval. We would suggest to present results of third party code audits prior to code deployments to the Osmosis Mainnet |
| COSMOS HUB #927 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Funding 3rd-Party Audit of ATOM Wars / Hydro Platform |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| INJECTIVE #405 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 13 May 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #61 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Wind Down FET-USD and AGIX-USD Markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees to wind down the FET and AGIX markets on the dYdX DEX due to the Superintelligence Alliance Token Merge |
| KAVA #180 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kava Rise payouts for May 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| KUJIRA #635 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload YUM Airdrop contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew appreciates the effort to airdrop YUM to KUJI stakers, opposes to upload the YUM airdrop contract though due to missing information about audit status, non-existent discussion or introduction. We'd like to question the neccesity of cosmwasm contract uploads for airdrops |
| CRESCENT #353 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #352 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #351 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #350 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #349 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #348 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #347 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #346 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #345 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #344 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #343 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop 1,020,002.00 ATOM |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| OSMOSIS #789 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Lion DAO Deployment Address to Upload Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting Lion DAO's address to deploy their lockdrop and pool manager contracts to the Osmosis Mainnet without further governance approval. We would suggest to present results of third party code audits prior to code deployments to the Osmosis Mainnet |
| KUJIRA #636 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: $YUM DAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to create the $YUM DAO as governance for cacaoswap, using YUM token as governance asset |
| SECRET NETWORK #303 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | 2024-Q2 Testnet Committee |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| NOLUS #124 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to optimize the oracle swap tree for the Osmosis Noble USDC protocol |
| KUJIRA #637 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Kartel Social Oracle |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Kartel Social Oracle DAO creation |
| KUJIRA #638 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: MantaDAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the MantaDAO creation |
| KUJIRA #639 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Re-upload the YUM Airdrop contract with correct instantiate permissions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes to upload the YUM airdrop contract though due to missing information about audit status, non-existent discussion or introduction. We'd like to question the neccesity of cosmwasm contract uploads for airdrops |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #63 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Decrease min_price_change_ppm by 5x for long-tail markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to decrease the min_price_change_ppm like proposed |
| EVMOS #295 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Combined Proposal for Leveraging Liquidity and Continuation of Liquidity Mining Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against combining two proposals into one. In our opinion both interests need to be discussed and voted on separately. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #62 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Vault Spread to 30bps |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the spread_min_ppm parameter update to 3000 / 30bps |
| INJECTIVE #407 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase max trading leverage for GBP/USDT PERP and EUR/USDT PERP Markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of increasing the maximum leverage for GBT/USDT and EUR/USDT perp markets to 50x |
| KUJIRA #640 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add instantiate permissions to Cacao Swap adin for YUM Airdrop contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes to upload the YUM airdrop contract though due to missing information about audit status, non-existent discussion or introduction. We'd like to question the neccesity of cosmwasm contract uploads for airdrops |
| CHIHUAHUA #77 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade v7.0.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew woofs for the Chihuahua mainnet upgrade to v7.0.1, arriving at block 13250000, implementing the free mint token parameters and whitelisting regarding addresses |
| OSMOSIS #790 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Orderbook as CW Pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the introduction of orderbooks as new pool type to allow for limit orders to be placed at arbitrary price points, further improving Osmosis UX |
| EVMOS #297 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update EVM params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports updating the EVM parameters |
| INJECTIVE #407 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload QTUM token contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is voting in favour of deploying the Quantum Finance QTUM token contract in order to enable QTUM swaps and transfers |
| KUJIRA #641 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Update Contract Authority: MantaDAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support this proposal due to missing information about the security protocol of this procedure and safety measures in place to prevent malicious action |
| KUJIRA #642 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Parameter Update: Code Upload permissions for Entropic CW1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support this proposal due to missing information about the third party audit results, hence being unsure if user funds would be at risk |
| CRESCENT #354 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #355 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #356 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #357 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #358 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| CRESCENT #359 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | YUM Airdrop - NEW Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| KUJIRA #643 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Unstake DAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes on the proposal to create the Unstake DAO |
| KUJIRA #644 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Fuzion Ignition v.1.6.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports updating the Fuzion Ignition contract to v1.6.0 to support 18 decimal place tokens |
| OSMOSIS #791 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Remove decimals from Astroport PCL pool queries |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses strict compliance with the protocol's rules for conducting governance discussions and uploading proposals in order to keep the community informed and able to make informed decsions about feasability |
| OSMOSIS #792 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Recognize Alloyed USDT as the Canonical USDT on Osmosis |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the introduction of Alloyed USDT in a CosmWasm Transmuter pool, composed of USDT.axl, USDT from Kava EVM, and Wormhole USDT, establishing it as the canonical version of USDT on Osmosis |
| OSMOSIS #793 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Replace USDT used as Quote asset |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the USDT quote asset change from Kava USDT to the Alloyed USDT according to proposal number 792 |
| OSMOSIS #794 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create Volume Splitting Groups for Alloyed USDT pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the creation of volume splitting gauges for all mentioned pools containing Alloyed USDT |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #64 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add MOTHER-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is following the discussions on the dYdX governance forum regarding asset listings, supporting the implementation of an AMM and finding appropriate metrics like listed exchange count to identify suitability of market listings. We believe the community should be a crucial part in discussing and decididing about market listing necessity, also seeing the community in charge of winding down illiquid markets that could endanger users. For MOTHER-USD market, we'd like to abstain, reserving our right to vote against listings if they show signs of negligence or unfeasibility for future listings. |
| OMNIFLIX #40 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy Polytone for DAO DAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the audited Polytone CosmWasm contract deployment to allow the DAO DAO team an Omniflix cross chain account controlled by an operations SubDAO, enabling other chains to interact with Omniflix and vice versa. |
| BITSONG #36 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Fund DAO DAO Deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| BITSONG #37 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Authorize DAO DAO Deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the audited Polytone CosmWasm contract deployment to allow the DAO DAO team an Omniflix cross chain account controlled by an operations SubDAO, enabling other chains to interact with Omniflix and vice versa. |
| OSMOSIS #795 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | nBTC Revenue Share Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the Protocol Revenue sharing aggreement between Osmosis and Nomic |
| COSMOS HUB #929 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Atom Airdrop Available - Try New Version |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| EVMOS #298 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | nBTC Airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| AXELAR #209 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal to Revamp and Improve Axelar Network Documentation |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| EVMOS #299 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Discover New Version EVMOS |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
| OSMOSIS #796 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Smart Accounts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes to activate the Smart Account functionality following a successful audit, enhancing the UX by enabling automatic orders based on triggers, one-click-trading, multi-key and multi-device support and more. |
| KAVA #182 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adds WBTC to Kava Lend and adjusts incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the WBTC addition to Kava Lend and described WBTC, axlBTC and axlUSDC incentive adjustments according to the proposal |
| STARGAZE #278 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Implement Copy-Staking for Stride’s Stargaze Delegations |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the copystaking implementations for Stride's $STARS delegations |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #65 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add MOG-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against adding the MOG-USD perp market on the dYdX exchange |
| OSMOSIS #797 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Incentives Adjustment for allUSDT |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to allow for incentive adjustments, namely migrating kava.USDT volume splitting gauges to allUSDT based VSGs as stated in proposal #794 and removing incentives from composability pools which are replaced by Alloyed Assets |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #66 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add TRUMP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to parameter issues contained within the proposal which would lead to an incorrect oracle price |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #67 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add TREMP-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the TREMP-USD perp market listing, missing a governance forum discussion including proper presentation of the token in question and would like to question TREMPs quality, market depth, volume etc. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #68 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add BODEN-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the BODEN-USD perp market listing, missing a governance forum discussion including proper presentation of the token in question and would like to question TREMPs quality, market depth, volume etc. |
| ODIN #25 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v0.8.3 upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the ODIN mainnet upgrade to v0.8.3, pushing CosmosSDK to v0.50.7, enhancing block speed, introduces NFTs, security updates and more |
| KUJIRA #645 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v1.1.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of upgrading the Kujira Mainnet to v1.1.0, pushing Passkey support, ics-20 callbacks for CosmWasm contracts and fee-less denom creation accounts and cosmos sdk 0.47.12 to mainnet |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #69 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ZRO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the ZRO-USD perp market on the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #70 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ZK-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the ZK-USD perp market addition to the dYdX exchange |
| INJECTIVE #408 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload ChainFactory Contract Wasm Code 1/2: Factory |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to missing discussion time on the governance forum prior to the proposal going onchain and missing information about third party code audits |
| STARGAZE #279 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | v14 Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Stargaze v14 upgrade, arriving with block #14252867 |
| COSMOS HUB #932 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ⚡Namada x Cosmos airdrop⚡ |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #71 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add TLOS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the TLOS-USD perp market listing on the dYdX exchange due to the coin being listed on 20+ CEXes and +3 DEXes, estimating there'll not be enough liquidity moving to the dYdX DEX |
| CELESTIA #2 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Pay for IBC Middleware Audits |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| JUNO #350 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Proposal to end the Juno Charter and return Juno tokens to community pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the proposal to terminate the Juno Charter, citing concerns about a proposal error that might disrupt the structure of the delegation program |
| KUJIRA #646 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | (Revised) Parameter Update: Code Upload permissions for Entropic Deployer |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew keeps it's stance towards whitelisting / permitting developers addresses to upload CosmWasm contracts withouth further governance discussion or decision |
| KUJIRA #647 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: MantaDAO Debt Positions |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to create a new subDAO for MantaDAO Ops multisig, holding the DAO debt positions |
| OMNIFLIX #41 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Authorize DAO DAO Deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against this proposal due to the ask for 100k USD in $FLIX being included within the same proposal as the DAO DAO authorization. Those should be two separate proposals in our opinion. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #72 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ONDO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the ONDO-USD perpetual market on dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #73 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ENA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the ENA-USD market addition to the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #74 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add IO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains on the IO-USD perp market deployment on the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #75 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AR-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew sees the AR-USD perp market addition as good opportunity for the dYdX community |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #76 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add KAS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew believes that launching the KAS-USD market on dYdX as the first DEX represents a good opportunity for the platform |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #77 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add NOT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew would not like to support the NOT-USD perpetual market deployment on the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #78 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add ENS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of adding the ENS-USD perp market to the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #79 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add FLOKI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the FLOKI-USD perp market addition |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #80 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin New Contract Codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the code ID pinning of the newly stored codes related to v0.7.0 on the Pirin mainnet |
| COSMOS HUB #931 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Slinky Beta Incentives Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| OSMOSIS #798 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Deployment of stOSMO liquidity from stableswap into Locust vault |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #933 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Atom Airdrop 2024 Cosmos airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| COSMOS HUB #934 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | Atom Airdrop 2024 Cosmos airdrop |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| COSMOS HUB #935 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create the Cosmos Hub’s Governance-Controlled Interchain Account on Neutron |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of creating a Cosmos Hub governance-controlled InterChain Account on Neutron |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #80 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add TAO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew sees the TAO-USD perp market addition as first DEX as good opportunity for the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #81 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add FTM-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains due to the countless number of FTM-pairs on other CEXes / DEXes |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #82 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add SAFE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add the SAFE-USD perp market on the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #83 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add TAIKO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains due to the small market cap compared to other assets and leaves the decision about the TAIKO-USD perp market to the community |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #84 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AKT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the AKT-USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #85 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add CAKE-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew views the introduction of the CAKE-USD perpetual market as an unnecessary addition to the dYdX exchange. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #86 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add BRETT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the BRETT-USD perp market addition on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #87 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Add SATS-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the dYdX-DEX SATS-USD perpetual market addition |
| QUICKSILVER #41 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.6.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the quicksilver-2 mainnet upgrade to v1.6.1 at block #8003500, enabling ICA Host support, updating to IBC v6, reducing block size, return-to-sender functionality and more |
| COMPOSABLE #23 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | PICA Improvement Proposal (PIP-1) - Update Tokenomics |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the PICA tokenomic improvements |
| INJECTIVE #409 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | INJ 3.0 Inflation Parameters Update 24Q2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the adjustment of the inflation_min parameter to 4.875% and the inflation_max parameter to 9.625%, following the guidelines set forth in the INJ 3.0 tokenomics and affirmed by proposal #392 |
| INJECTIVE #410 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload ChainFactory Contract Wasm Code 2/2: Token |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the proposal, citing the lack of time for community discussion on the governance forum and missing details about third-party code audits |
| INJECTIVE #411 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 10 June 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| OSMOSIS #799 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Transmuter v3.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Transmuter contract upgrade to v3.1, delivering new CosmWasm pool functionality for alloyed asset creation and implementing security features |
| STARGAZE #280 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Community Pool separation for Interchain NFT incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| PERSISTENCE #111 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with XPRT, stkXPRT, and PSTAKE rewards for July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
