CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update February 2026

4. March 2026

Dear Community,

We’re pleased to share an update on our governance activities for February 2026. This month, we screened over 35 networks and participated in voting on 28 proposals across 11 chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators. Below is a chart highlighting the top 10 most active networks and a breakdown of our votes:

Top 10 most active chains by governance proposals and CryptoCrew vote breakdown Top 10 most active chains by governance and CryptoCrew vote breakdown

In February, CryptoCrew voted on four mainnet upgrade proposals across Cosmos Hub, Injective, XION, and MANTRA. These upgrades focused on protocol stability, security hardening, and targeted feature rollouts, ranging from Gaia’s v26.0.0 release and Injective’s Real-Time EVM upgrade to XION’s security patch upgrade and MANTRA’s v7.0.0 redenomination-focused transition.
February 2026 chain upgrades CryptoCrew-supported upgrades (February 2026)

Outside of chain upgrades, February governance activity focused primarily on market structure adjustments and cross-chain maintenance. The most consequential decisions included a series of dYdX proposals restructuring perpetual markets through parameter updates and large-scale market wind-downs, Osmosis governance changes adjusting Alloyed BTC collateral composition, and several IBC light client recoveries restoring connectivity between networks such as Cosmos Hub, Osmosis, Secret Network, and Stargaze. Together, these proposals reflected a month centered on market maintenance, cross-chain reliability, and incremental protocol improvements rather than sweeping ecosystem-wide changes.

As usual, you can find the full list of proposals we voted on in February 2026 by scrolling down below.

Your delegations allow us to maintain the quality of this service and represent our collective interests in governance. Remember, you can always override our vote with your own preferences on any active proposal. We appreciate your continued trust and support.

Kind regards,
The CryptoCrew Team ✅

Proposal:OSMOSIS #1003
Vote:abstain
Title:Withdraw and Burn Levana Liquidity
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #1004
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Quicksilver Labs Development Address for CosmWasm Contract Uploads
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against general whitelisting of developer upload addresses, favoring proposal-based governance oversight for every contract upload and noting the lack of a forum introduction and insufficient deployment information.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #343
Vote:yes
Title:Update CLOB Pair Tick Size for Selected Perpetual Markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports updating CLOB parameters across 20 selected perpetual markets by reducing subticks per tick and adjusting step sizes, improving price granularity and execution quality in line with current on-chain and indexer baselines.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #344
Vote:abstain
Title:Loss Rebates Pilot Program - Second Distribution of January
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:NOLUS #325
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Trees (Long Markets and allBTC Short)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of optimizing the Oracle swap paths by shifting allBTC and allSOL routes to more liquid USDC pools, reducing slippage and execution costs.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #1002
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC Client: Osmosis ↔ Bostrom (07-tendermint-1597)
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Osmosis <-> Bostrom IBC light client recovery after successfully validating the client states:

=== Message #1 ===
 subject_client_id = 07-tendermint-1597
 substitute_client_id = 07-tendermint-3666

Enter REFERENCE_CHAIN_RPC for this message: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/bostrom
  → host client state for 07-tendermint-1597
  → host client state for 07-tendermint-3666
  → reference header for height 21516009
  → reference header for height 22538392

----------------------------------------
Proposal title:
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-1597 substitute=07-tendermint-3666
Reference RPC: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/bostrom
  host:      8A81BCEF61057773600A9925CA3551527095D3F7FB3117FA84156A95E5E5B74D
  reference: 8A81BCEF61057773600A9925CA3551527095D3F7FB3117FA84156A95E5E5B74D
  host:      23B45B8A0A0AB04025E47645148BE97215EC91018FA6E0D8EA4BF80439EA69DC
  reference: 23B45B8A0A0AB04025E47645148BE97215EC91018FA6E0D8EA4BF80439EA69DC
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid
✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:COSMOS HUB #1023
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC Client: Cosmos Hub Bostrom (07-tendermint-764)
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Cosmos Hub <-> Bostrom IBC light client recovery after successfully validating the client states:

=== Message #1 ===
 subject_client_id = 07-tendermint-764
 substitute_client_id = 07-tendermint-1465

Enter REFERENCE_CHAIN_RPC for this message: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/bostrom
  → host client state for 07-tendermint-764
  → host client state for 07-tendermint-1465
  → reference header for height 21281093
  → reference header for height 22538392

----------------------------------------
Proposal title:
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-764 substitute=07-tendermint-1465
Reference RPC: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/bostrom
  host:      6920E9DFAD06163FDF6F6BD7287B90F22B259A075E7D58B03BE95457DE2D5157
  reference: 6920E9DFAD06163FDF6F6BD7287B90F22B259A075E7D58B03BE95457DE2D5157
  host:      23B45B8A0A0AB04025E47645148BE97215EC91018FA6E0D8EA4BF80439EA69DC
  reference: 23B45B8A0A0AB04025E47645148BE97215EC91018FA6E0D8EA4BF80439EA69DC
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid
✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:SECRET NETWORK #341
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC light client for Cheqd
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Secret Network <-> Cheqd IBC light client recovery after successfully validating the client states:

Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-196 substitute=07-tendermint-234
Reference RPC: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/cheqd
  host:      DF095BB597472D159C9D3BA08A8B590213B38CEA59F0521C071C2DF6204B0AC7
  reference: DF095BB597472D159C9D3BA08A8B590213B38CEA59F0521C071C2DF6204B0AC7
  host:      3912422C97FAEDC394F58FF423AFCEACE1E280717A628BD640CACD4FEE8CED86
  reference: 3912422C97FAEDC394F58FF423AFCEACE1E280717A628BD640CACD4FEE8CED86
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid
✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #345
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 10 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:COSMOS HUB #1024
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v26.0.0 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the Gaia v26.0.0 upgrade at block #29837600, introducing the tokenfactory module v0.53.5 with governance-adjustable denom creation parameters (10 ATOM fee, 2,000,000 gas), adding stake validation for wasm governance votes, fixing the x/liquid liquid_shares annotation, and bumping mapstructure to v2.3.0 and gogoproto v1.7.2.
Proposal:DYMENSION #38
Vote:yes
Title:Enroll KAS Solana remote router on Dymension Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against enrolling the KAS Solana remote router due to the absence of a governance forum introduction, unclear audit and open-source status, and insufficient technical disclosure, posing potential risk to users and the Dymension network.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #1005
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed BTC: Increase WBTC Variant Caps to 75%
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports increasing the WBTC variant caps within Alloyed BTC, raising WBTC and WBTC.eth.axl from 50% to 75% and WBTC.eth.atom from 10% to 75%, while keeping total WBTC exposure at 100%
Proposal:INJECTIVE #619
Vote:yes
Title:Real-Time EVM Mainnet Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Real-Time EVM Mainnet Upgrade to Injective v1.18.0 at block #154983000, advancing the native EVM and MultiVM architecture, expanding shared-liquidity interoperability, strengthening Chainlink real-time price feed integration, enhancing WebSocket streaming and Ledger multisig support, and delivering key cross-chain and stability improvements.
Proposal:XION #54
Vote:yes
Title:Software Upgrade v28 - Security Enhancement
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the XION v28 security upgrade at block #18912000, delivering a security patch on the XION mainnet.
Proposal:XION #53
Vote:yes
Title:Store XION Marketplace Contract Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves storing both the XION Asset and XION Marketplace contracts, built by Burnt Labs, testnet-proven and audited by SCV Security, enabling CW721 NFT collections with plugin-based transfer rules alongside a standalone marketplace providing listings, escrowed offers, and configurable fees
Proposal:XION #52
Vote:yes
Title:Store XION Asset Contract Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves storing both the XION Asset and XION Marketplace contracts, built by Burnt Labs, testnet-proven and audited by SCV Security, enabling CW721 NFT collections with plugin-based transfer rules alongside a standalone marketplace providing listings, escrowed offers, and configurable fees
Proposal:SECRET NETWORK #343
Vote:yes
Title:Adding a new machine for Citadel.one
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the registration of the new Citadel.one machine (dac4c291870cbd898af53ecc298626474b9b5e9d) to maintain validator reliability
Proposal:INJECTIVE #620
Vote:yes
Title:Dynamic Gas Fee Parameter Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of aligning dynamic gas fee scaling with the existing minimum gas price by capping dynamic fee escalation so it cannot exceed the fixed minimum gas price
Proposal:OSMOSIS #1006
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed BTC: Increase WBTC Variant Caps to 75% - Resubmission
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on the resubmission of #1005 to increase WBTC variant caps within Alloyed BTC, raising WBTC and WBTC.eth.axl from 50% to 75% and WBTC.eth.atom from 10% to 75%, while maintaining total WBTC exposure at 100%.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #347
Vote:no
Title:Wind down SAGA-USD, NC-USD, BOME-USD, B3-USD, BABYDOGE-USD, SOPH-USD, MICHI-USD, NIL-USD, AR-USD and XAI-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes NO on Proposal #347 due to an incorrect parameter in the market wind-down configuration
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #348
Vote:yes
Title:Wind down SAGA-USD, NC-USD, BOME-USD, B3-USD, BABYDOGE-USD, SOPH-USD, MICHI-USD, NIL-USD, AR-USD and XAI-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Proposal #348 to wind down SAGA-USD, NC-USD, BOME-USD, B3-USD, BABYDOGE-USD, SOPH-USD, MICHI-USD, NIL-USD, AR-USD, and XAI-USD markets
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #346
Vote:abstain
Title:Fee Holiday for BTC & BONK markets - March 2026
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentives or rewards as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:STARGAZE #330
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC Expired Client from AtomeOne
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Stargaze <-> AtomOne IBC client recovery after successfully validating the client states:

Message #1
Subject Client
07-tendermint-380
Substitute Client
07-tendermint-398
Reference chain: atomone (atomone-1)
Reference Chain RPC
https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/atomone

Substitute Client — 07-tendermint-398 (height 7342044)
host: A52716EE89D2D5D3E1570BF171847123F2F6090DE2818209ACDCBAC83A05C9C9
reference: A52716EE89D2D5D3E1570BF171847123F2F6090DE2818209ACDCBAC83A05C9C9

✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:MANTRA ZONE #29
Vote:abstain
Title:v7.0.0 MAINNET MANTRA Chain Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew recognizes the v7.0.0 mainnet upgrade at block #13000000 executing the $OM to $MANTRA redenomination, module-wide balance and parameter scaling, denom updates (BondDenom, GasDenom, evm_denom), tokenfactory and crisis fee adjustments, and IBC escrow handling, however abstains in line with our internal policy on token supply and incentive changes.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #621
Vote:abstain
Title:OLP Reward Disbursement – Epoch 55
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentives or rewards as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:JUNO #372
Vote:abstain
Title:Proposal: Reduce Maximum Validator Set to 25
Rationale:CryptoCrew maintains neutrality and abstains on reducing the maximum validator set to 25, given its direct impact on validator economics and the importance of community consensus on network configuration.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #349
Vote:yes
Title:Wind down AITECH-USD, ALPACA-USD, ALT-USD, API3-USD, BADGER-USD, BICO-USD, CETUS-USD, CLV-USD, COOKIE-USD, DAI-USD, EGLD-USD, ELX-USD, FORTH-USD, GLMR-USD, GMX-USD, GRASS-USD, HOLO-USD and KDA-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of winding down AITECH-USD, ALPACA-USD, ALT-USD, API3-USD, BADGER-USD, BICO-USD, CETUS-USD, CLV-USD, COOKIE-USD, DAI-USD, EGLD-USD, ELX-USD, FORTH-USD, GLMR-USD, GMX-USD, GRASS-USD, HOLO-USD and KDA-USD, moving all markets to STATUS_FINAL_SETTLEMENT and disabling trading
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #350
Vote:yes
Title:Wind down KERNEL-USD, KRL-USD, LAYER-USD, MAGIC-USD, MAJOR-USD, MASK-USD, MEW-USD, NEWT-USD, NFT-USD, NMR-USD, ONT-USD, ORCA-USD, PIRATE-USD, PIXEL-USD, PNUT-USD, QNT-USD, REZ-USD and SATS-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the orderly shutdown of KERNEL-USD, KRL-USD, LAYER-USD, MAGIC-USD, MAJOR-USD, MASK-USD, MEW-USD, NEWT-USD, NFT-USD, NMR-USD, ONT-USD, ORCA-USD, PIRATE-USD, PIXEL-USD, PNUT-USD, QNT-USD, REZ-USD and SATS-USD, finalizing settlement parameters and deactivating markets with limited activity.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #591
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Hyper Ninja: Fighting Kaiju Addresses for Wasm Upload
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the whitelisting of Hyperninjas addresses for the same reasons stated in Proposal #547, #548 and #552 citing failure to properly introduce and present the project and contracts for governance discussion, non-disclosure of source code and audit status, and absence of Testnet deployment — all of which pose unacceptable risks to both user funds and chain security. We previously noted that a No_With_Veto might be warranted, and now view it as necessary since this proposal has been resubmitted a third time unchanged despite prior community rejection.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #308
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 7 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #309
Vote:no
Title:Reduce regular voting period to 48 hours and expedited to 18 hours
Rationale:CryptoCrew would generally support the intent to shorten the regular voting period to 48 hours but votes against, as we consider a 24-hour minimum for expedited proposals a more balanced standard that better accommodates global participation and validator review while keeping governance responsive.
Proposal:MANTRA ZONE #27
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase Active set for Decentralization of Network
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from proposal #27 to increase MantraChain’s active validator set from 32 to 33, maintaining neutrality and avoiding potential conflicts of interest related to validator rewards, while leaving the decision on network configuration to the community.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #310
Vote:abstain
Title:Set staking tiers
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #311
Vote:abstain
Title:Add order router rev share for CCXT
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #312
Vote:abstain
Title:Upgrade FARTCOIN-USD market from ISOLATED to CROSS and/or change liquidity tier
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not see the market parameter modification as reasonable given the limited trading activity.
Proposal:BABYLON #18
Vote:yes
Title:v4 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Babylon v4 upgrade at block #1893601 for its technical improvements and staking enhancements but abstains from voting due to the inclusion of inflation and reward-related parameter changes, maintaining neutrality in line with our policy on financial adjustments.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #313
Vote:no
Title:Adjust Protocol Revenue Sharing
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes NO on proposal #313, as proposal #304 already established a new buyback allocation framework, and there’s no clear rationale to modify revenue sharing again within such a short period.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #313
Vote:abstain
Title:Adjust Protocol Revenue Sharing
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #592
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Onchain Maker Fee Rebates
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:OSMOSIS #995
Vote:abstain
Title:Allocate additional USDC to OSMO buyback and liquidity strategy (November 2025)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:OSMOSIS #996
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase Staking Rewards Smoothing Factor to 14
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #314
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for 2Z-USD, ASTER-USD, ATH-USD, AVNT-USD, BEAM-USD, BERA-USD, CRO-USD and DRIFT-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #593
Vote:yes
Title:Settle NFLX/USDT Perpetuals Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positive to settle the NFLX/USDT PERP market to avoid pricing inconsistencies from the stock split
Proposal:INJECTIVE #594
Vote:yes
Title:Enable EVM Mapping for $DRUGS Token
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains due to insufficient clarity on the DRUGS token’s contract provenance, audit status, and legitimacy within the Injective ecosystem.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #315
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for EIGEN-USD, ENA-USD, HYPE-USD, KAITO-USD, MNT-USD, MORPHO-USD, MOVE-USD and ONDO-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also votes YES regarding setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #316
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for PAXG-USD, PENGU-USD, POL-USD, POPCAT-USD, PUMP-USD, SPX-USD, S-USD and SYRUP-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports the the defaultFundingRate1H setting to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:OMNIFLIX #66
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Active Validator Set to 27
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains to remain neutral, allowing the OmniFlix community to decide on the validator set reduction as part of the network’s end-of-life transition.
Proposal:KAVA #207
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise Payouts July 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #317
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for TAO-USD, TRUMP-USD, USUAL-USD, WLFI-USD, XMR-USD, XPL-USD, ZEC-USD and ZEN-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets to maintain consistent funding behavior and promote stable, predictable trading conditions.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #318
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for FARTCOIN,RAYDIUM,9BB6NFECJBCTNNLFKO2FQVQBQ8HHM13KCYYCDQBGPUMP-USD and ZORA-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for these additional perp markets to ensure consistent funding parameters and maintain stable, predictable market behavior.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #595
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC light clients for Sommelier & Kujira
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC client recovery between Injective and Sommelier and Kujira after successfully validating the client states:

Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-135 substitute=07-tendermint-320
Reference RPC: https://sommelier-rpc.polkachu.com:443
host: 73252B8721C9095BF6C806B803F2DCFEB7D0605C990923422AEF6FDDC50B0AF9
reference: 73252B8721C9095BF6C806B803F2DCFEB7D0605C990923422AEF6FDDC50B0AF9
host: D32658D0A1553D12BE786A338D247D7A03D02BB252328D315E28F45F5A05D6BA
reference: D32658D0A1553D12BE786A338D247D7A03D02BB252328D315E28F45F5A05D6BA
----------------------------------------
:white_check_mark: subject client valid
:white_check_mark: substitute client valid
Message #2: subject=07-tendermint-144 substitute=07-tendermint-321
Reference RPC: https://kujira-rpc.polkachu.com:443
host: CF5045E263748886EDAF5CDE44C839412D002C061EF7821A804724B21C91FAE1
reference: CF5045E263748886EDAF5CDE44C839412D002C061EF7821A804724B21C91FAE1
host: E8812677700BA283749ED89866294DCD7A656509AE53B1457014E309B4B24FEE
reference: E8812677700BA283749ED89866294DCD7A656509AE53B1457014E309B4B24FEE
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid
✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:INITIA #61
Vote:yes
Title:Delist Zaar from Minitswap
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes regarding the Zaar delisting as their team has decided to deprecate their chain.
Proposal:PERSISTENCE #154
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v16.0.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the v16.0.0 upgrade at block #24838400, which updates Cosmos SDK to 0.53.4, IBC-Go to 10.4.0, introduces IBC-callbacks, the protocol pool, cosmos-sdk-epochs, and fixes channels created with the IBC-fee middleware.
Proposal:SOMMELIER #171
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC light client for Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Sommelier <-> Injective client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #319
Vote:abstain
Title:Set liquidity_tier to 2 for FARTCOIN,RAYDIUM,9BB6NFECJBCTNNLFKO2FQVQBQ8HHM13KCYYCDQBGPUMP-USD
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to the liquidity tier adjustments for the mentioned markets.
Proposal:DYMENSION #31
Vote:yes
Title:"Beyond" Software upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the “Beyond” upgrade at block 10192266, which moves the chain to v4.0.0, including major IRO and Pump Stream expansions, Hyperlane + KAS bridge + IBC rate-limit integration, TEE-based finalization, circuit-breaker and gas-free flows, upgraded rollapp/light-client safety, and extensive fixes across IRO (Initial Rollapp Offering)
Proposal:BABYLON #19
Vote:yes
Title:v4.1 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Babylon mainner v4.1 upgrade at block #1987027, delivering important security fixes
Proposal:COSMOS HUB #1017
Vote:abstain
Title:Migrate Stargaze, its Applications, and Collections to the Cosmos Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #597
Vote:yes
Title:Update Hourly Funding Rate Cap for Pre-IPO Perpetuals on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes *YES* to raise the hourly funding rate cap for the OPENAI/USDT, ANTHROPIC/USDT, and SPACEX/USDT pre-IPO perps, improving market flexibility and risk management.
Proposal:SECRET NETWORK #334
Vote:yes
Title:Secret Network v1.23.2 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Secret Network’s v1.23.2 upgrade at block #22678000, enabling governance-based onboarding of new nodes and machine IDs, allowing unrestricted Azure validators, applying critical WasmD CWA-2025-007 and Cosmos SDK ASA-2025-003 security patches, and adding EOL/unsupported hardware warnings to strengthen network safety and operability.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #598
Vote:yes
Title:Pause PUGGO/INJ and XRP/USDT Spot Markets Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES to pause the PUGGO/INJ and XRP/USDT spot markets and cancel all open orders.
Proposal:DYMENSION #32
Vote:yes
Title:Bootstrap KAS Module
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES to initialize the KAS–DYM bridge module with its core components, enabling cross-chain operations.
Proposal:DYMENSION #33
Vote:yes
Title:Add KAS as a base asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports proposal #33, whitelisting Kaspa (KAS) as a base asset on Dymension
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #320
Vote:abstain
Title:Fee Holiday for BTC & SOL markets - December 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #321
Vote:abstain
Title:Liquidation Rebate Pilot Program
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:TERRA2 #4844
Vote:abstain
Title:Phoenix Directive - Revenue Generating PoL Deployment
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #599
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Onchain Maker Fee Rebates
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
* Rationale condensed for readability; refer to the full version above for details.