CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update October 2024

3. November 2024

Dear Community,

We’re glad to present our governance voting activities for October 2024. This month, we diligently reviewed over 40 networks and participated in voting on 92 proposals across 24 different chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of the network and our delegators.

Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.

Kind regards, The CryptoCrew Team ✅

 

INJECTIVE #444
Vote:abstain
Title:FUNDING PROPOSAL: Fund development of Apello
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #445
Vote:abstain
Title:Funding Proposal: Support Development of Apello (Corrected Proposal)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
NOLUS #173
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust Leaser Parameters (Osmosis Noble USDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Osmosis Noble USDC Leaser Parameter adjustmets according to the proposal (rising the interest due period from 18 to 30 days)
NOLUS #174
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust Leaser Parameters (Neutron Noble USDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew also agrees to the Neutron Noble USDC Leaser parameter adjustments as outlined in the proposal, namingly the extension of the interest due period from 18 to 30 days
NOLUS #175
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust Leaser Parameters (Osmosis stATOM)
Rationale:CryptoCrew affirms the proposed changes to the Leaser contract parameters for Osmosis stATOM, notably extending the interest due period to 30 days
EVMOS #313
Vote:abstain
Title:Fast and reliable public RPC - powered by Lava
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #161
Vote:abstain
Title:dYdX Ops subDAO 3.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
STARGAZE #289
Vote:yes
Title:Whitelist Deployment Address for Skip
Rationale:CryptoCrew consents to the whitelisting of the Skip Protocol team's address to facilitate their connection with StarDEX and enhance user experience
C4E #11
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade v1.4.3
Rationale:CryptoCrew confirms its support for the C4E mainnet's upgrade to version 1.4.3 at block #10606457, which includes significant updates to Cosmos SDK v0.47.12, IBC-go v7.3.0, and CometBFT v0.37.5, enhances the Wasm module, introduces a new IBChooks module, and rectifies several bugs
OSMOSIS #850
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Ark Protocol Developer Wallets for InterChain NFT Contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the direct whitelisting of the Ark Protocol developer's wallet due to our conservative stance towards deployer wallet approvals. We are open to separately approving each of Ark Protocol’s audited open-source contracts: cw-ics721, cw-ics721_plus, and cw-ics721-proxy, if presented as distinct proposals
AXELAR #240
Vote:abstain
Title:Axelarate Series for Axelar Ecosystem
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
PERSISTENCE #117
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT, and PSTAKE rewards for October 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
AKASH NETWORK #269
Vote:abstain
Title:2024 Q4 Community Support Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
AXELAR #241
Vote:abstain
Title:Regional Moderators Proposal - Axelar Brazilian Portuguese Community (October 2024 - March 2025)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #163
Vote:yes
Title:Add Skip's signer as a market authority and sets 10% revenue share on new markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the proposal to integrate Skip Protocol as the first Oracle Market Mapper into the x/marketmap module on the dYdX mainnet
NOLUS #176
Vote:yes
Title:Register First Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to integrate the first price feeder for the Osmosis allBTC Oracle by whitelisting the mentioned address
NOLUS #177
Vote:yes
Title:Register Second Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the second price feeder registration for the Osmosis allBTC BTC oracle smart contract
NOLUS #178
Vote:yes
Title:Register Third Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the whitelisting of the third price feeder for the Osmosis allBTC Oracle smart contract
NOLUS #179
Vote:yes
Title:Register Fourth Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the integration of the fourth price feeder into the Osmosis allBTC Oracle, authorizing the listed address
NOLUS #180
Vote:yes
Title:Register Fifth Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to the fifth price feeder activation for the Osmosis allBTC Oracle system, whitelisting the proposed address
NOLUS #181
Vote:yes
Title:Register First Price Feeder (Osmosis allBTC Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes to approve the registration of the first price feeder by whitelisting its address for the Osmosis allSOL Oracle
NOLUS #182
Vote:yes
Title:Register Second Price Feeder (Osmosis allSOL Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the second price feeder's integration into the Osmosis allSOL Oracle by approving the whitelisting of its address
NOLUS #183
Vote:yes
Title:Register Third Price Feeder (Osmosis allSOL Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the third price feeder for the Osmosis allSOL Oracle
NOLUS #184
Vote:yes
Title:Register Fourth Price Feeder (Osmosis allSOL Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to whitelist the address of the fourth price feeder for the Osmosis allSOL Oracle
NOLUS #185
Vote:yes
Title:Register Fifth Price Feeder (Osmosis allSOL Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew confirms the addition of the fifth price feeder to the Osmosis allSOL Oracle by approving the whitelisting of its address
AGORIC #78
Vote:yes
Title:agoric-upgrade-17
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Agoric mainnet upgrade to v-17, arriving with block #16947291, delivering orchestration core upgrades
OSMOSIS #851
Vote:abstain
Title:Return LAB from SAIL agreement to origin
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #162
Vote:yes
Title:Update large-cap liquidity tier parameter
Rationale:CryptoCrew favors the proposal to elevate the initial_margin_ppm parameter, enabling enhanced leverage options up to 50x in the Large Cap liquidity tier
INJECTIVE #446
Vote:no
Title:Upload Injex Finance Vesting Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew values Injex Finance's transparency and trying to adhere to governance best practice by opening a dialogue in the governance forum regarding its upcoming contract deployments. Nevertheless, we must emphasize the incomplete security disclosures in the whitepaper, the missing audit documents, and a general statement about security from their documentation that literally states:'Is Injex Finance secure? The whitepaper doesn't explicitly mention security measures, audits, or technical details regarding the security of Injex Finance. Therefore, a detailed security assessment would require additional information and a review of the project's technical documentation and security practices.'These concerns necessitate a no-vote from us on Injex Finance's contract deployment due to the potential risk to user funds.
NOLUS #191
Vote:yes
Title:Pirin v0.6.5
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Nolus Pirin upgrade to v0.6.5, starting with block #7725900, adjusting the inflation rate according to signaling proposal #163, implementing a new minting formula and bugfixes
DYDX PROTOCOL #164
Vote:no
Title:Add CETUS-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the proposal after the dYdX Foundation identified a flaw with the market map exponent
DYDX PROTOCOL #165
Vote:no
Title:Add TRUMPWIN-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the TRUMPWIN-USD perp market addition to the dYdX DEX
COSMOS HUB #968
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:ATOM Airdrop - Cosmo Hub New Version
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
ARCHWAY #54
Vote:yes
Title:v9.0.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Archway upgrade to v9.0.0 at block height 6836450, upgrading CosmosSDK to v0.50.7, wasmd to 0.51.0, wasmvm to v1.5.4, ibc-go to v8.4.0, CometBFT to v0.38.10, adding the IBC hooks module v8 and fixing the callback module regarding fee estimation queries
TERRA2 #4823
Vote:abstain
Title:Phoenix Directive - Alliance Reform and Ecosystem Growth Initiative
Rationale:CryptoCrew takes a neutral stance on the Phoenix Directive proposal, not influencing the reward structuring, leaving the decision entirely to the community
INJECTIVE #447
Vote:abstain
Title:Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 30 September 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #166
Vote:yes
Title:Add CETUS-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the CETUS-USD perp market addition to the dYdX DEX
KAVA #190
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise Payouts September 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. This decision is intended to ensure the best interests of our community decides about the outcome of the vote. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the on-chain governance voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and deCryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward structure adjustments as a fundamental policy, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governancemocratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KAVA #189
Vote:abstain
Title:Extend incentive reward periods for Kava Earn and Kava Lend
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
TERRA2 #4822
Vote:abstain
Title:Launching the Phoenix Directive Treasury
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
INJECTIVE #448
Vote:no
Title:Kira Liquidity Pool Locker to be deployed on the injective mainnet
Rationale:CryptoCrew declines to support this proposal, citing non-compliance with governance norms that mandate preliminary discussions on the governance forum and specific details like Git Commit ID and compiler version for CosmWasm deployments
SECRET NETWORK #310
Vote:abstain
Title:Secret Network Foundation Tax Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
AXELAR #242
Vote:yes
Title:Register Gateway for flow
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Gateway registration for connecting Flow to the Axelar Network
AXELAR #243
Vote:yes
Title:Authorize Multisig Prover for flow
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in support of authorizing the Multisig Prover address for Flow with the same address as on the testnet
AXELAR #244
Vote:yes
Title:Authorize Multisig Prover for flow
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in support of authorizing the Multisig Prover address for Flow with the same address as on the testnet
KAVA #191
Vote:abstain
Title:Adds Merlin-BTC to Kava Lend
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains regarding the addition of Merlin-BTC to the Kava Lend protocol
KUJIRA #682
Vote:abstain
Title:Migrate Amp Governance Voting Escrow to v1.5.0 contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew opts out of voting, noting the proposal’s lack of detailed information on Amp Governance’s decommissioning and early withdrawal from locks
SOMMELIER #167
Vote:yes
Title:Update Token Prices - Oct 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to update existing SOMM token prices within the x/cellarfees and x/auction modules
EVMOS #314
Vote:abstain
Title:[ECP-3] Renewal of the Evmos DAO Governance Workstream - 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
COSMOS HUB #969
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Gateway to the Interchain & Ethereum ecosystem
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #852
Vote:yes
Title:Rate Limit adjustment: Remove CUDOS limits
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the CUDOS ratelimit adjustments in the light of the upcoming migration event to ASI
DYDX PROTOCOL #167
Vote:no
Title:Add ZBCN-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not see Zebec Network as a valuable addition to the dYdX ecosystem
DYDX PROTOCOL #168
Vote:yes
Title:Set Vault Quoting Params
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of optimizing the dYdX chain vault performance by adjusting the vault parameters based on individual market charakteristics as stated within the governance forum
STARGAZE #290
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Stargaze Credit Card
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
EVMOS #315
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Get Evmos Credit Card
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #853
Vote:yes
Title:BC Rate Limiting v2 - Upgrade contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the IBC Rate Limit contract upgrade to v2, adding Role Based Access Control (RBAC) to the existing contract
INJECTIVE #449
Vote:yes
Title:Reduce Peggy Slashing Percentage
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to the proposed Peggy Module parameter modifications to match uptime slashing settings
QUICKSILVER #47
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Redemption
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
NOLUS #192
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Nolus Credit Card
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
CHIHUAHUA #81
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade v8.0.2
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Chihuaha Mainnet upgrade to v8.0.2 with block #15103000
DYDX PROTOCOL #169
Vote:no
Title:Add SPX-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew declines the SPX-USD market addition proposal due to an unavailable market map
MIGALOO #49
Vote:abstain
Title:Create Perpetual Terra Liquidity Alliance Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains regarding the Perpetual Terra Liquidity Alliance proposal
AKASH NETWORK #270
Vote:abstain
Title:Akash Payments [Console 2.0] Funding Request
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
MIGALOO #48
Vote:abstain
Title:Cancel boneLuna Alliance Rewards
Rationale:CryptoCrew refrains from voting regarding adjusting boneLUNA alliance rewards
MIGALOO #47
Vote:abstain
Title:Cancel ampLuna Alliance Rewards
Rationale:CryptoCrew takes a neutral stance regarding setting ampLUNA alliance rewards
DYDX PROTOCOL #170
Vote:abstain
Title:dYdX VIP Affiliate Tier Proposal to be managed by Kuyen Labs
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #171
Vote:yes
Title:Disable AGIX-USD, FET-USD, and MATIC-USD in market map
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes on the expedited proposal to disable the AGIX-USD, FET-USD and MATIC-USD markets which have been wound down according to proposal 61 and 147
STARGAZE #291
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivize STARS / USDC Pool on Stardex
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
AGORIC #79
Vote:yes
Title:Signaling Proposal for the election of the 2024 Economic Committee
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the proposal to update the Economic Committee roster, adjust board membership size, and eliminate the Secretary position
COSMOS HUB #970
Vote:yes
Title:Update consensus and feemarket params
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the proposal to increase maximum gas utilization from 30m to 75 million per block, aiming to enhance UX on the Cosmos Hub
NOLUS #196
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:FINAL DECISION AIRDROP 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #854
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed USDT: Add USDT variants from ETH L2s via Axelar to Alloyed USDT
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the addition of several Axelar bridged Ethereum L2 USDT variants (USDT.rt, USDT.arb.axl, USDT.matic.axl, USDT.op.axl & USDT.eth.inj) to the constituents of Alloyed USDT on Osmosis
OSMOSIS #855
Vote:yes
Title:IBC Rate Limiting v2 - Delegate management to a subDAO
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the proposal to transfer IBC rate limit management to a subDAO governed by a 3/6 multisig, involving Noble, Osmosis Foundation, Range Security, and Skip
MANTRA ZONE #1
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Max Validator Count to 13
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Max Validator parameter adjustment to 13
MANTRA ZONE #2
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Inflation to the goal rate of 8%
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any proposals regarding reward or incentive structure adjustments as a matter of principle. *
PERSISTENCE #118
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT, and PSTAKE rewards for November 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
NOLUS #197
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:ATOM Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
AKASH NETWORK #271
Vote:abstain
Title:FINAL PAYMENT FOR COMPLETED MILESTONES (Revised): Adding Full Akash Support & Features to the Cosmos Metamask Snap
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
COSMOS HUB #971
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v21 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Cosmos Hub Gaia v21 upgrade, bumping ICS Security to v6.3.0 at block #22953640, enabling memo field usage for ICS reward handling and accepting up to three denoms for rewards
NOLUS #198
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports updating the Oracle swap tree for Osmosis USDC to optimize swap routes, integrating Supercharged Pool 1942 (BTC/USDC)
NOLUS #199
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis allSOL)
Rationale:CryptoCrew advocates for the allBTC Oracle update, recognizing Pool 1942 as liquidity improvement
NOLUS #200
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis allSOL)
Rationale:CryptoCrew favors the allSOL Oracle update, noting that Pool 1942’s liquidity will support efficient transactions
LUM NETWORK #109
Vote:yes
Title:Fix the IBC link between Lum and Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to re-activate the connection between Lum Network and Injective after successfully checking the clients in question: >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-26 - last revision: 1 height: 87009596host: 3EDF00CF3B352D887515C50F86E82ADBE8883944B523867E8CE27811F903B784 | reference: 3EDF00CF3B352D887515C50F86E82ADBE8883944B523867E8CE27811F903B784<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-27 - last revision: 1 height: 92468613host: CA896A9E367CDDF546D06E32F11CCEE372F03FDABFEFDCD150EC8C704B53B784 | reference: CA896A9E367CDDF546D06E32F11CCEE372F03FDABFEFDCD150EC8C704B53B784----------------------------------✅ subject client valid!✅ substitute client valid!
ODIN #27
Vote:no
Title:Mainnet Upgrade Proposal: Introducing Kvasir with v0.10 – Enhanced AI Routing and System Improvements
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no, highlighting an error regarding the missing version number for the proposed upgrade
NOLUS #201
Vote:yes
Title:Pin Contract Codes (v0.7.4)
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the pinning of contract IDs for the newly updated v0.7.4 smart contracts on the Nolus Pirin mainnet
ODIN #28
Vote:yes
Title:Mainnet Upgrade Proposal: Introducing Kvasir with v0.10 – Enhanced AI Routing and System Improvements
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to upgrade the Odin Mainnet to v0.10.0 with block #17056800
NOLUS #202
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis AKT)
Rationale:CryptoCrew concurs with the enhancement of the AKT Oracle swap tree, accepting the supercharged BTC/USDC pool #1942 as the most liquid option
INJECTIVE #451
Vote:no
Title:Paradyze Mainnet Provider Oracle
Rationale:CryptoCrew lacks key details on Paradyze’s prediction platform, including information on builders, the whitepaper, whether contracts are open- or closed-source, and impartial third-party audits
INJECTIVE #452
Vote:no
Title:CryptoCrew cannot endorse this proposal due to a lack of prior discussions in the governance forum. We also question the audit integrity if a deposit bug in the Kira Liquidity Pool Locker contract was missed
Rationale:CryptoCrew declines to support this proposal, citing non-compliance with governance norms that mandate preliminary discussions on the governance forum and specific details like Git Commit ID and compiler version for CosmWasm deployments
QUICKSILVER #48
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.6.4
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes Quicksilver’s version v1.6.4 upgrade at block #9829000, resolving state issues after proposal #47 and CL pool changes
KUJIRA #684
Vote:no
Title:Store AutoKujira's AutoClaimer contract v1
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not support deploying AutoKujira’s AutoClaimer due to the new developer profile, missing audit, and lack of comprehensive project background and community engagement
NOLUS #202
Vote:yes
Title:Smart Contract Migration to v0.7.4
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the smart contract migration to v0.7.4, upgrading CosmWasm to v2.x and CoinDTO Library to handle amounts as strings
* shortened version, see the full rationale above.