Blog

CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update November 2025

2. December 2025

Dear Community,

We’re pleased to share an update on our governance activities for November 2025. This month, we screened over 35 networks and participated in voting on 65 proposals across 17 chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators. Below is a chart highlighting the top 10 most active networks and a breakdown of our votes:

Top 10 most active chains by governance proposals and CryptoCrew vote breakdown Top 10 most active chains by governance and CryptoCrew vote breakdown

In total, CryptoCrew supported eight mainnet upgrades this month across the Cosmos Hub, Babylon, Dymension, Secret Network, Persistence, Injective, and dYdX. These upgrades reflected steady technical progress across the ecosystem, improving reliability, cross-chain interoperability, and validator operations. They also delivered concrete platform advances including EVM and rollapp runtime expansion, IBC feature upgrades, and multiple security/maintenance patches.

November 2025 chain upgrades CryptoCrew-supported upgrades (November 2025)

dYdX Proposal #303 – dYdX Chain v9.4: Approved a protocol upgrade introducing leverage enforcement, staking-tiered fee logic, per-market discounts, and refined affiliate mechanics, alongside TWAP and staking-metrics fixes to strengthen trading safety and market integrity.

Injective Proposal #583 – Injective “Altria” Mainnet Upgrade (v1.17.0): Activated full public EVM mainnet access, unified MultiVM execution, and upgraded Geth with EIP-1559 DynamicFeeTx support, improving developer experience, gas predictability, and overall runtime reliability.

Cosmos Hub Proposal #1016 – Gaia v25.2.0 Upgrade: Delivered an expedited patch upgrade with key dependency bumps (including wasmd and related tooling) to address stability issues and maintain secure compatibility across the Hub stack.

Babylon Proposal #18 – Babylon v4 Software Upgrade: Rolled out a major mainnet upgrade adding technical and staking-layer improvements for BTCFi and co-staking functionality, advancing Babylon’s protocol maturity and operational robustness.

Babylon Proposal #19 – Babylon v4.1 Software Upgrade: Implemented a follow-on security-focused release containing critical fixes and hardening measures to stabilize the network after the v4 rollout.

Dymension Proposal #31 – “Beyond” Upgrade (v4.0.0): Upgraded core rollapp infrastructure with major bridge/module expansions, new safety controls (including circuit-breaker and rate-limit integrations), and performance improvements to enhance rollapp throughput and cross-chain interoperability.

Secret Network Proposal #334 – Secret Network v1.23.2 Upgrade: Included key SDK/WasmD security patches and MachineID onboarding updates, but #334 and #335 were rejected as erroneous and superseded by the corrected Proposal #336.”

Persistence Proposal #154 – PersistenceCore v16.0.0: Upgraded to Cosmos SDK v0.53.4 and IBC-Go v10.4.0, introduced IBC callbacks and protocol-pool/epochs components, and fixed middleware edge cases to expand IBC feature depth and reinforce chain reliability.

Separate from chain upgrades, several governance proposals this month touched on consensus safety, application whitelisting, incentive integrity, and voting-process design:

On Celestia, we voted YES on Proposal #7, supporting a lower min_signed_per_window to match the new 2/3-precommit finalization behavior and reduce avoidable validator jailing, strengthening liveness and cross-region ops.

On Injective, we voted NO on Proposal #591, declining the Hyper Ninja Wasm upload whitelist over weak disclosure, unclear audit/source-code status, and repeated resubmissions without addressing prior concerns; consistent with our security-first stance.

For dYdX voting-process design, we voted NO on Proposal #309 (which still passed), sharing the goal of shorter voting windows but opposing these exact parameters, since a 24-hour expedited minimum better preserves global review while staying responsive.

On dYdX incentives, we initially ABSTAINED on Proposal #306 but later switched to NO after the Foundation confirmed an incorrect TWAP and the proposal was rescinded; an example of real-time governance hygiene and correction of flawed incentive submissions.

You can find the full list of proposals we voted on this month by scrolling down below.

Your delegations allow us to maintain the quality of this service and represent our collective interests in governance. Remember, you can always override our vote with your own preferences on any active proposal. We appreciate your continued trust and support.

Kind regards,
The CryptoCrew Team ✅
Proposal:CELESTIA #7
Vote:yes
Title:Set min_signed_per_window to .001
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs lowering min_signed_per_window over a 10,000-block window to 0.001 (0.1%) from 0.75 on Mainnet and Arabica, and 0.01 on Mocha to align parameters across networks and prevent jailing of geographically distant or less-performant validators following the consensus-pacing change that finalizes blocks once 2/3 precommits arrive, resulting in fewer signatures per commit.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #580
Vote:yes
Title:Whitelisting Strategic Partner Addresses for Controlled Rollout of EVM on Mainnet XI
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on Proposal #580 to whitelist 66 strategic partner addresses for Injective’s controlled EVM rollout on Mainnet, enabling them to deploy smart contracts under governance oversight.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #991
Vote:yes
Title:Update stSTARS/STARS Scaling Factor Controller to Auto Update Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the upgrade of pool #810 (stSTARS/STARS) to the stToken Scaling Factor Auto-update Contract and its oracle-driven automation, switching to automated updates in a fully trustless manner - consistent with our YES vote on Proposal #988.
Proposal:NOLUS #321
Vote:abstain
Title:Adjust Gas Tax Parameter
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #992
Vote:yes
Title:Update stJUNO/JUNO Scaling Factor Controller to Auto Update Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the upgrade of pool #817 (stJUNO/JUNO) to the stToken Scaling Factor Auto-update Contract and its oracle-driven automation, switching to automated updates in a fully trustless manner — consistent with our YES vote on Proposal #988.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #581
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Onchain Maker Fee Rebates
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #303
Vote:yes
Title:dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v9.4
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Injective v9.4.0 protocol mainnet upgrade, arriving with block #62250000, introducing leverage enforcement for improved risk control, staking-based fee tiers, per-market fee discounts, refined affiliate logic (removal of whitelist, 30-day revenue cap), and integrated commission handling; alongside fixes to staking metrics and TWAP logic.
Proposal:OMNIFLIX #65
Vote:abstain
Title:Turn off inflation on OmniFlix Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:OSMOSIS #993
Vote:abstain
Title:Monthly OSMO Taker Fee Burn: October 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #304
Vote:abstain
Title:3 months of trial to allocate 80% of fees to buybacks
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #582
Vote:abstain
Title:OLP Reward Disbursement – Epoch 51
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #585
Vote:yes
Title:Whitelisting Strategic Partner Addresses for Controlled Rollout of EVM on Mainnet XII
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positive on Proposal #585 to whitelist 68 strategic partner addresses for Injective’s controlled EVM rollout on Mainnet, enabling them to deploy smart contracts under full governance oversight.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #305
Vote:yes
Title:Wind down AI16Z-USD and DODGERSWIN-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs Proposal #305 to wind down the AI16Z-USD and DODGERSWIN-USD markets for cleaner oracle alignment and smoother market operations.
Proposal:AKASH NETWORK #310
Vote:abstain
Title:Community Pool Spend
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #583
Vote:yes
Title:Injective Altria Mainnet Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Injective Altria Mainnet Upgrade to v1.17.0 at block #141150000, activating full public EVM mainnet access, unifying the MultiVM runtime, upgrading Geth to v1.16.3 with EIP-1559 DynamicFeeTx integration for predictable gas pricing, deterministic execution and low-latency dev experience, also enhancing exchange risk management by subaccount offsetting and open notional caps.
Proposal:SECRET NETWORK #333
Vote:abstain
Title:Recover expired ibc client on Umee
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Secret Network <-> Umee client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #306
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 7 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #307
Vote:abstain
Title:Fee Holiday for BTC & SOL Markets - November 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #306
Vote:no
Title:Surge Season 7 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew changes it's vote to no on proposal #306 following clarification from the dYdX Foundation that the submission was erroneous, using a 30-day TWAP instead of the intended 7-day TWAP, and has since been rescinded.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #586
Vote:yes
Title:Token Metadata Update ( ATOM )
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports proposal #586 to fix the ATOM token metadata by setting decimals to 6, resolving display and accounting errors across wallets, explorers, and dApps.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #587
Vote:yes
Title:Token Metadata Update ( wETH )
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs proposal #587 to fix the wETH token metadata by setting decimals to 18, correcting display and accounting issues across wallets, explorers, and dApps for accurate ecosystem integration.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #588
Vote:yes
Title:Token Metadata Update ( USDC )
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on proposal #588 to correct the USDC token’s decimals to 6, ensuring accurate denomination handling and smoother integrations across Injective’s ecosystem.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #589
Vote:yes
Title:Token Metadata Update ( TIA )
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positive regarding proposal #589, updating TIA’s on-chain metadata for proper 6-decimal precision, ensuring accurate representation and smoother ecosystem integrations.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #590
Vote:yes
Title:Token Metadata Update ( stINJ )
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports proposal #590 to update the stINJ token metadata, setting decimals to 6 to fix incorrect display values and improve consistency across wallets, explorers, and integrations.
Proposal:BABYLON #17
Vote:abstain
Title:Whitelisting b14g Deployer Address to launch Co-Staking Marketplace
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports whitelisting b14g’s designated deployer address (bbn19vzjc8ukssczfkpp66m6msce2nf0t9ueg2h2za) to deploy and maintain audited, dev- and testnet-proven smart contracts for the b14g Co-Staking Marketplace on the Babylon mainnet, strictly limited in scope and controlled by a multisig, enabling native BTCFi liquidity, aligning BTC and BABY incentives, improving capital efficiency, and unlocking new DeFi strategies across the Babylon ecosystem.
Proposal:OSMOSIS #994
Vote:abstain
Title:[Fixed]Revive expired IBC client for dHealth
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Osmosis <-> dHealth IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
Proposal:COSMOS HUB #1016
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v25.2.0 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on the expedited Gaia v25.2.0 upgrade at block 28,356,500, which patches a medium-severity issue and updates go metric to v1.37.0, go-viper to v2.3.0, and wasmd to v0.60.2 to enhance stability and maintain compatibility.
Proposal:INITIA #60
Vote:abstain
Title:Active Validator Set Reduction Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from proposal #60 on reducing Initia’s active validator set from 50 to 20 to maintain neutrality and avoid conflicts of interest related to validator rewards, leaving the decision on network configuration to the community.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #591
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Hyper Ninja: Fighting Kaiju Addresses for Wasm Upload
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the whitelisting of Hyperninjas addresses for the same reasons stated in Proposal #547, #548 and #552 citing failure to properly introduce and present the project and contracts for governance discussion, non-disclosure of source code and audit status, and absence of Testnet deployment — all of which pose unacceptable risks to both user funds and chain security. We previously noted that a No_With_Veto might be warranted, and now view it as necessary since this proposal has been resubmitted a third time unchanged despite prior community rejection.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #308
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 7 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #309
Vote:no
Title:Reduce regular voting period to 48 hours and expedited to 18 hours
Rationale:CryptoCrew would generally support the intent to shorten the regular voting period to 48 hours but votes against, as we consider a 24-hour minimum for expedited proposals a more balanced standard that better accommodates global participation and validator review while keeping governance responsive.
Proposal:MANTRA ZONE #27
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase Active set for Decentralization of Network
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from proposal #27 to increase MantraChain’s active validator set from 32 to 33, maintaining neutrality and avoiding potential conflicts of interest related to validator rewards, while leaving the decision on network configuration to the community.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #310
Vote:abstain
Title:Set staking tiers
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #311
Vote:abstain
Title:Add order router rev share for CCXT
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #312
Vote:abstain
Title:Upgrade FARTCOIN-USD market from ISOLATED to CROSS and/or change liquidity tier
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not see the market parameter modification as reasonable given the limited trading activity.
Proposal:BABYLON #18
Vote:yes
Title:v4 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Babylon v4 upgrade at block #1893601 for its technical improvements and staking enhancements but abstains from voting due to the inclusion of inflation and reward-related parameter changes, maintaining neutrality in line with our policy on financial adjustments.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #313
Vote:no
Title:Adjust Protocol Revenue Sharing
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes NO on proposal #313, as proposal #304 already established a new buyback allocation framework, and there’s no clear rationale to modify revenue sharing again within such a short period.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #313
Vote:abstain
Title:Adjust Protocol Revenue Sharing
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #592
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Onchain Maker Fee Rebates
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:OSMOSIS #995
Vote:abstain
Title:Allocate additional USDC to OSMO buyback and liquidity strategy (November 2025)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:OSMOSIS #996
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase Staking Rewards Smoothing Factor to 14
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #314
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for 2Z-USD, ASTER-USD, ATH-USD, AVNT-USD, BEAM-USD, BERA-USD, CRO-USD and DRIFT-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES on setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #593
Vote:yes
Title:Settle NFLX/USDT Perpetuals Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positive to settle the NFLX/USDT PERP market to avoid pricing inconsistencies from the stock split
Proposal:INJECTIVE #594
Vote:yes
Title:Enable EVM Mapping for $DRUGS Token
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains due to insufficient clarity on the DRUGS token’s contract provenance, audit status, and legitimacy within the Injective ecosystem.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #315
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for EIGEN-USD, ENA-USD, HYPE-USD, KAITO-USD, MNT-USD, MORPHO-USD, MOVE-USD and ONDO-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also votes YES regarding setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #316
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for PAXG-USD, PENGU-USD, POL-USD, POPCAT-USD, PUMP-USD, SPX-USD, S-USD and SYRUP-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports the the defaultFundingRate1H setting to 0 across the specified perp markets.
Proposal:OMNIFLIX #66
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Active Validator Set to 27
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains to remain neutral, allowing the OmniFlix community to decide on the validator set reduction as part of the network’s end-of-life transition.
Proposal:KAVA #207
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise Payouts July 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #317
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for TAO-USD, TRUMP-USD, USUAL-USD, WLFI-USD, XMR-USD, XPL-USD, ZEC-USD and ZEN-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 across the specified perp markets to maintain consistent funding behavior and promote stable, predictable trading conditions.
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #318
Vote:yes
Title:Set defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for FARTCOIN,RAYDIUM,9BB6NFECJBCTNNLFKO2FQVQBQ8HHM13KCYYCDQBGPUMP-USD and ZORA-USD markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports setting the defaultFundingRate1H to 0 for these additional perp markets to ensure consistent funding parameters and maintain stable, predictable market behavior.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #595
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC light clients for Sommelier & Kujira
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC client recovery between Injective and Sommelier and Kujira after successfully validating the client states:

Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-135 substitute=07-tendermint-320
Reference RPC: https://sommelier-rpc.polkachu.com:443
host: 73252B8721C9095BF6C806B803F2DCFEB7D0605C990923422AEF6FDDC50B0AF9
reference: 73252B8721C9095BF6C806B803F2DCFEB7D0605C990923422AEF6FDDC50B0AF9
host: D32658D0A1553D12BE786A338D247D7A03D02BB252328D315E28F45F5A05D6BA
reference: D32658D0A1553D12BE786A338D247D7A03D02BB252328D315E28F45F5A05D6BA
----------------------------------------
:white_check_mark: subject client valid
:white_check_mark: substitute client valid
Message #2: subject=07-tendermint-144 substitute=07-tendermint-321
Reference RPC: https://kujira-rpc.polkachu.com:443
host: CF5045E263748886EDAF5CDE44C839412D002C061EF7821A804724B21C91FAE1
reference: CF5045E263748886EDAF5CDE44C839412D002C061EF7821A804724B21C91FAE1
host: E8812677700BA283749ED89866294DCD7A656509AE53B1457014E309B4B24FEE
reference: E8812677700BA283749ED89866294DCD7A656509AE53B1457014E309B4B24FEE
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid
✅ substitute client valid
Proposal:INITIA #61
Vote:yes
Title:Delist Zaar from Minitswap
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes regarding the Zaar delisting as their team has decided to deprecate their chain.
Proposal:PERSISTENCE #154
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v16.0.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the v16.0.0 upgrade at block #24838400, which updates Cosmos SDK to 0.53.4, IBC-Go to 10.4.0, introduces IBC-callbacks, the protocol pool, cosmos-sdk-epochs, and fixes channels created with the IBC-fee middleware.
Proposal:SOMMELIER #171
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC light client for Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Sommelier <-> Injective client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #319
Vote:abstain
Title:Set liquidity_tier to 2 for FARTCOIN,RAYDIUM,9BB6NFECJBCTNNLFKO2FQVQBQ8HHM13KCYYCDQBGPUMP-USD
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to the liquidity tier adjustments for the mentioned markets.
Proposal:DYMENSION #31
Vote:yes
Title:"Beyond" Software upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the “Beyond” upgrade at block 10192266, which moves the chain to v4.0.0, including major IRO and Pump Stream expansions, Hyperlane + KAS bridge + IBC rate-limit integration, TEE-based finalization, circuit-breaker and gas-free flows, upgraded rollapp/light-client safety, and extensive fixes across IRO (Initial Rollapp Offering)
Proposal:BABYLON #19
Vote:yes
Title:v4.1 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Babylon mainner v4.1 upgrade at block #1987027, delivering important security fixes
Proposal:COSMOS HUB #1017
Vote:abstain
Title:Migrate Stargaze, its Applications, and Collections to the Cosmos Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #597
Vote:yes
Title:Update Hourly Funding Rate Cap for Pre-IPO Perpetuals on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes *YES* to raise the hourly funding rate cap for the OPENAI/USDT, ANTHROPIC/USDT, and SPACEX/USDT pre-IPO perps, improving market flexibility and risk management.
Proposal:SECRET NETWORK #334
Vote:yes
Title:Secret Network v1.23.2 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Secret Network’s v1.23.2 upgrade at block #22678000, enabling governance-based onboarding of new nodes and machine IDs, allowing unrestricted Azure validators, applying critical WasmD CWA-2025-007 and Cosmos SDK ASA-2025-003 security patches, and adding EOL/unsupported hardware warnings to strengthen network safety and operability.
Proposal:INJECTIVE #598
Vote:yes
Title:Pause PUGGO/INJ and XRP/USDT Spot Markets Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES to pause the PUGGO/INJ and XRP/USDT spot markets and cancel all open orders.
Proposal:DYMENSION #32
Vote:yes
Title:Bootstrap KAS Module
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes YES to initialize the KAS–DYM bridge module with its core components, enabling cross-chain operations.
Proposal:DYMENSION #33
Vote:yes
Title:Add KAS as a base asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew also supports proposal #33, whitelisting Kaspa (KAS) as a base asset on Dymension
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #320
Vote:abstain
Title:Fee Holiday for BTC & SOL markets - December 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
Proposal:DYDX PROTOCOL #321
Vote:abstain
Title:Liquidation Rebate Pilot Program
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:TERRA2 #4844
Vote:abstain
Title:Phoenix Directive - Revenue Generating PoL Deployment
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
Proposal:INJECTIVE #599
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Onchain Maker Fee Rebates
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
* Rationale condensed for readability; refer to the full version above for details.

You may also like

Contact & Support

support@ccvalidators.com | office@ccvalidators.com | info@ccvalidators.com

Partners & collaborators