CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update May 2025

3. June 2025

Dear Community,

We are delighted to share an update on our governance activities for May 2025. This month, we diligently screened more than 35 networks and participated in voting on 101 proposals across 24 different chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators.

Your delegations allow us to maintain the high quality of this service and effectively represent our collective interests. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your own preferences on any active proposal. We sincerely appreciate your trust and support.

Kind regards, the CryptoCrew Team ✅

 

JUNO #364
Vote:yes
Title:Juno Upgrade (v28)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of rolling out the Juno Mainnet upgrade to v28, implementing Cosmos SDK 50 and CosmWasm 2 with Juno 28.0.2
OSMOSIS #925
Vote:yes
Title:Remove Picasso Assets from Alloyed Pools
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports removing Picasso bridge assets from Alloyed pools to mitigate user risk and maintain asset integrity
COSMOS HUB #995
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v23.2.0 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the expedited Cosmos Hub Gaia v23.2.0 upgrade to ensure seamless connectivity with Ethereum following the Pectra hard fork.
SECRET NETWORK #322
Vote:yes
Title:Support SNIP-2x Token Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the SNIP-20 upgrade for stronger privacy and user protections
OSMOSIS #927
Vote:abstain
Title:Monthly BTC Purchase: April 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #926
Vote:yes
Title:Monthly OSMO Taker Fee Burn: April 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the monthly OSMO taker fee burn of March 2025, following the communities decision on proposal 903, allocating 50% of the collected OSMO taker fees to a burn address instead of distributing it to stakers
QUICKSILVER #60
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.8.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Quicksilver mainnet upgrade to v1.8.0, which updates the Cosmos SDK to v0.47.17, CometBFT to v0.37.15, IBC to v7.10.0, and PFM to v7.1.3, also introducing a new governance message type to execute arbitrary transactions on ICA accounts.
INITIA #31
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Minitswap’s Pool Size and Recover Velocity Parameter
Rationale:CryptoCrew affirms the pool and velocity upgrades on Minitswap as a step toward stronger L2 interoperability
INJECTIVE #522
Vote:abstain
Title:Recover IBC client to Andromeda
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Injective <-> Andromeda IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
INJECTIVE #523
Vote:yes
Title:Settle Various Deprecated Perpetuals Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to responsibly settle deprecated 1MPEPE and SPX6900 perpetuals based on oracle pricing
INJECTIVE #524
Vote:yes
Title:Decrease hourly funding rate cap for various RWA markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew aligns with the cap adjustment to bring funding rates in line with responsible trading conditions
INJECTIVE #522
Vote:yes
Title:Recover IBC client to Andromeda
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positively regarding the substitution of the IBC Client between Injective and Andromeda after successfully validating the channels:


>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-250 - last revision: 1 height: 7677117
host: A66C9F877E21432567A48A1B394F0C3329535D07D8DE52BF62D9B067FDE96C90 | reference: A66C9F877E21432567A48A1B394F0C3329535D07D8DE52BF62D9B067FDE96C90
<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-310 - last revision: 1 height: 7677117
host: A66C9F877E21432567A48A1B394F0C3329535D07D8DE52BF62D9B067FDE96C90 | reference: A66C9F877E21432567A48A1B394F0C3329535D07D8DE52BF62D9B067FDE96C90
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
INITIA #27
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist BFB on VIP
Rationale:CryptoCrew does not endorse proposals related to gambling applications or smart contracts that might jeopardize user funds
INITIA #28
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Embr on VIP
Rationale:CryptoCrew declines to support EMBR’s VIP whitelisting due to the protocol's speculative token mechanics, unclear code source status and missing third-party code audit, which could pose risks to user funds
INITIA #29
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Rena on VIP
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the RENA VIP whitelisting due to the absence of a third-party audit and no clear indication of the code’s source status
COSMOS HUB #994
Vote:yes
Title:Change neutron-1’s consumer chain phase to STOPPED
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the change of the neutron-1 chain's phase to STOPPED, following the sovereign launch of Neutron and to reflect the current state of chain independence and validator set separation
INJECTIVE #525
Vote:yes
Title:IBC light client recovery omnibus for Juno and Mantrachain
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positively regarding the substitution of the IBC Clients between Injective and Juno as well as Injective and Mantrachain after successfully validating the channels:
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-101 substitute=07-tendermint-311
host: 00348E6BC0674F07CFB50F1D95842490BF8CCB84E5993BAE16B2E11BAEE8EF36
reference: 00348E6BC0674F07CFB50F1D95842490BF8CCB84E5993BAE16B2E11BAEE8EF36
host: 99D22526D144DBD3E155209344626F2E7BCE83E8B84EEB2AA7E64DB417EA3015
reference: 99D22526D144DBD3E155209344626F2E7BCE83E8B84EEB2AA7E64DB417EA3015
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!

Message #2: subject=07-tendermint-275 substitute=07-tendermint-312
host: 3BBC72020CAC26089940A03CC9DF646A242C30D72617BDAC0400DEDD227897F4
reference: 3BBC72020CAC26089940A03CC9DF646A242C30D72617BDAC0400DEDD227897F4
host: 339148795322D42DD9B01EBC9E2DBC51B963616355BDA3725104938449AF09E6
reference: 339148795322D42DD9B01EBC9E2DBC51B963616355BDA3725104938449AF09E6
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
DYDX PROTOCOL #242
Vote:yes
Title:IBC light client update for Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positively regarding the substitution of the IBC Clients between DYDX and Injective after successfully validating the channels:
>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-26 - last revision: 1 height: 68026552
host: 76FC1BD0A908F16E4DF154DA728510E9B2138DC641A5E3989068607E625EFC4D | reference: 76FC1BD0A908F16E4DF154DA728510E9B2138DC641A5E3989068607E625EFC4D
<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-34 - last revision: 1 height: 116262619
host: E775015BC2672B7192159DF8BA033F4EE42B9FD10A1D93A045EDC5A3FB19133E | reference: E775015BC2672B7192159DF8BA033F4EE42B9FD10A1D93A045EDC5A3FB19133E
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!


INITIA #32
Vote:yes
Title:Delist Zaar from VIP
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Zaar delisting from Initia's Vested Interest Program due to the factors described in the proposal
COSMOS HUB #996
Vote:abstain
Title:Revert Community Pool Tax Rate to 2%
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
QUICKSILVER #61
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.8.1
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Quicksilver Mainnet upgrade to v1.8.1, which addresses a signing issue introduced in v1.8.0 related to Ledger (amino) transactions
OSMOSIS #928
Vote:yes
Title:Add Eureka as a Canonical Bridge Service Provider
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the addition of Eureka as a canonical bridge service provider, advancing permissionless and efficient cross-chain liquidity integration through IBC v2. By expanding access to virtual machine–based chains like Ethereum, its L2s, Solana, and others, Eureka helps bring IBC’s composability, transparency, and security to a wider range of blockchain ecosystems
DYMENSION #27
Vote:yes
Title:IBC light client recovery for Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positively regarding the IBC light client recovery between Dymension and Injective after successfully validating the channels:


>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-41 - last revision: 1 height: 78280531
host: 85EF9CDC37B564F6507EBF0141C21721A388D4C43C426BC2E64774841BEEA90B | reference: 85EF9CDC37B564F6507EBF0141C21721A388D4C43C426BC2E64774841BEEA90B
<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-73 - last revision: 1 height: 116257500
host: B877E70EAA9FA4B6400CAE42B5E1D174C61E783635F497DA21EFD8DA59FC4D96 | reference: B877E70EAA9FA4B6400CAE42B5E1D174C61E783635F497DA21EFD8DA59FC4D96
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
ORAICHAIN #316
Vote:yes
Title:Disable module for maintenance and enhance EVM defautl precompile contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the foundation developer's initiative to upgrade the EVM with expanded static precompiles and permissionless access.
OSMOSIS #929
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed ETH: Add ETH.atom
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the integration of ETH.atom into Alloyed ETH with a 10% cap, powered by cost-effective IBC Eureka routing
OSMOSIS #930
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed USDT: Add USDT.eth.atom
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the integration of USDT.eth.atom with a 20% static limit, enhancing permissionless USDT bridging via Eureka
OSMOSIS #931
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed BTC: Add WBTC.eth.atom
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of integrating WBTC.eth.atom into Alloyed BTC, offering users a new secure route via Eureka
JUNO #365
Vote:yes
Title:IBC light client recovery for Injective
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes positively regarding the IBC light client recovery between Juno and Injective after successfully validating the channels:

>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-127 - last revision: 1 height: 9234208
host: B3BC88B3765096D7622980397B2E8B22CA2E4C7AA48C4469E0DF581D6AAA53F8 | reference: B3BC88B3765096D7622980397B2E8B22CA2E4C7AA48C4469E0DF581D6AAA53F8
<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-578 - last revision: 1 height: 116257506
host: B877E70EAA9FA4B6400CAE42B5E1D174C61E783635F497DA21EFD8DA59FC4D96 | reference: B877E70EAA9FA4B6400CAE42B5E1D174C61E783635F497DA21EFD8DA59FC4D96
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
DYDX PROTOCOL #243
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 1 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #526
Vote:no
Title:DojoSwap Atomic Swap
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the deployment of DojoSwap's Atomic Swap contract, citing the absence of a formal governance thread, lack of audit verification for the contract, posing risks to user funds if the code is flawed or malicious
SECRET NETWORK #323
Vote:yes
Title:IBC light client update for Agoric
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC light client recovery between Secret Network and Agoric after successfully validating the channels:

subject=07-tendermint-111 substitute=07-tendermint-219
host: D188FAFD6C7813D4069B286005E4601B55BF26F0EBCCC757B5537B8247C69B38
reference: D188FAFD6C7813D4069B286005E4601B55BF26F0EBCCC757B5537B8247C69B38
host: 2682D1B3D1AAE166EF75974B0B8378A4FC08D3FDDF50CF935296678DD53B9288
reference: 2682D1B3D1AAE166EF75974B0B8378A4FC08D3FDDF50CF935296678DD53B9288
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
INITIA #33
Vote:yes
Title:Update VIP contract to add score deletion function
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the addition of the execute_rollup_challenge function to the VIP module, ensuring that inaccurate rollup scoring does not lead to incorrect esINIT distribution
MILKYWAY #17
Vote:abstain
Title:Add vesting accounts to x/investors module
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
DYDX PROTOCOL #244
Vote:yes
Title:Increase equity tier rate-limit on dYdX
Rationale:CryptoCrew sees the revised equity tier limits as a crucial step toward enhancing order book depth and liquidity on dYdX
DYMENSION #28
Vote:abstain
Title:update desmos ibc client
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Dymension <-> Desmos IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
COSMOS HUB #997
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v23.3.0 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew appreciates the expedited upgrade to Gaia v23.3.0 on the Cosmos Hub, addressing a critical security issue
DYMENSION #28
Vote:yes
Title:update desmos ibc client
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC client recovery between Dymension and Desmos after successfully validating the channels:

Enter REFERENCE_CHAIN_RPC for this message: https://rpc.desmosai.evm.ra.mn.rollapp.network
→ host client state for 07-tendermint-58
→ host client state for 07-tendermint-75
→ reference header for height 9837
→ reference header for height 10675
----------------------------------------
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-58 substitute=07-tendermint-75
host: 3585261F40CBE68C5AF89ACC957433DEAC6CDFB439A35B7EC627D45D0E827649
reference: 3585261F40CBE68C5AF89ACC957433DEAC6CDFB439A35B7EC627D45D0E827649
host: 3585261F40CBE68C5AF89ACC957433DEAC6CDFB439A35B7EC627D45D0E827649
reference: 3585261F40CBE68C5AF89ACC957433DEAC6CDFB439A35B7EC627D45D0E827649
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
BABYLON #9
Vote:yes
Title:v1.1 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Babylon’s v1.1 upgrade to deliver vital security fixes
OSMOSIS #932
Vote:abstain
Title:Renew the OGP Market Making Initiative for One Year
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. *
COSMOS HUB #998
Vote:yes
Title:Decrease voting period to 7 days and expedited voting period to 3 days
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the reduction of the Cosmos Hub’s standard voting period to 7 days and expedited voting period to 3 days, enhancing governance responsiveness while retaining the option to revert the changes should quorum challenges arise or better solutions emerge
BITSONG #44
Vote:yes
Title:v022 - Nina
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Bitsong Nina mainnet upgrade to v022, delivering the latest version of the Cosmos-SDK and fixing issues as stated in the proposal
DYDX PROTOCOL #245
Vote:yes
Title:Increase equity tier rate-limit on dYdX for short-term orders
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the proposed adjustments to block rate limits on the dYdX DEX, enhancing trading efficiency for lower-tier users while maintaining a balanced approach to network scalability and validator performance
AXELAR #317
Vote:yes
Title:Migrate InterchainTokenService to v1.2.1
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to upgrade the ITS to v1.2.1 to enable peer-to-peer token registration, adjustable token supplies, full-bit max-uint precision, and enhanced query capabilities
AXELAR #318
Vote:no
Title:Upload Multisig contract v1.2.1
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the proposal due to the absence of a governance forum thread explaining the purpose and changes in v1.2.1
AXELAR #319
Vote:no
Title:Migrate Multisig to v1.2.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew cannot support this proposal as it is part of a series of uploads with unclear versioning and no contextual explanation
AXELAR #320
Vote:no
Title:Upload Multisig contract v2.0.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the upload in its current form, citing a lack of transparency, governance discussion, and coherent version control
DYDX PROTOCOL #246
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
MILKYWAY #18
Vote:abstain
Title:Recover Babylon Tendermint client
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Milkyway <-> Babylon IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
MILKYWAY #19
Vote:abstain
Title:Increase validators min commissions to 10%
Rationale:CryptoCrew generally aligns with the establishment of a 10% minimum commission rate for validators on the Milkyway mainnet, abstains though due to our policy regarding incentive- and reward structure adjustments
COMDEX #243
Vote:abstain
Title:Update comdex<>gravity expired client
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Comdex <-> Gravity IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
COMDEX #243
Vote:yes
Title:Update comdex<>gravity expired client
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC client recovery between Comdex and Gravity Bridge after successfully validating the channels:

subject=07-tendermint-111 substituProposal title:
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-217 substitute=07-tendermint-219
Reference RPC: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/gravitybridge
host: 912B5EA5E1A258721CD0F3F9B06E3751C8016FDBF5D6A7A1CF2F647C71FAD78C
reference: 912B5EA5E1A258721CD0F3F9B06E3751C8016FDBF5D6A7A1CF2F647C71FAD78C
host: E7C65F66EC2AB48F3B43E224041A757EDBA99F396B1248476E9F687ECA3884D5
reference: E7C65F66EC2AB48F3B43E224041A757EDBA99F396B1248476E9F687ECA3884D5----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
MILKYWAY #18
Vote:no
Title:Recover Babylon Tendermint client
Rationale:CryptoCrew changes its vote to no because the clients in question aren't expired
AGORIC #94
Vote:no
Title:Fast USDC: Beta support for EVM destinations
Rationale:CryptoCrew maintains its stance from proposal #87 against deploying unfinished contracts to the mainnet, also pointing out insufficient information regarding third party code audits
INJECTIVE #527
Vote:yes
Title:Settle JELLYJELLY/USDT Perpetuals Across Injective DEXs
Rationale:CryptoCrew favors the settlement of the JELLYJELLY/USDT PERP market on the Injective DEXs, as proposed
OMNIFLIX #57
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$OmniFlix Airdrop Get Rewards - Save & WIN!
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
SAGA #10
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade to 0.3
Rationale:CryptoCrew affirms the Saga v0.3 mainnet upgrade execution at block #6223733, introducing a change in GMP to forward unsupported ABI payloads
COMDEX #244
Vote:abstain
Title:Upgrade gravity client
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains on the Comdex <-> Gravity IBC client revival proposal until the clients have been successfully verified by our team
OSMOSIS #933
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$ATOM Airdrop - New Version 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
INJECTIVE #528
Vote:abstain
Title:OLP Reward Disbursement - Epoch 45
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
INITIA #38
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Embr.fun to Minitswap
Rationale:CryptoCrew rejects the Embr.fun whitelisting proposal due to the opaque status of the contract code, lack of third-party code audits, and speculative elements that could threaten user funds. Additionally, there is no justification for using an expedited proposal, which limits time for due diligence
INITIA #36
Vote:yes
Title:VIP Contract Update: Add Lock Staking Event Type
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports enhancing VIP tracking by introducing a LockStakeEvent, improving visibility into esINIT staking activity
INITIA #37
Vote:yes
Title:Increase VIP Zap Minimum Duration
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #935
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$ATOM Airdrop - AtomONE Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #308
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$ATOM Airdrop AtomONE Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #934
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Hydro Deployment Address to Upload Contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the whitelisting request for Hydro Protocol’s team wallet, adhering to our conservative approach regarding general whitelisting and preferring governance oversight for all contract introductions
CHIHUAHUA #91
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$ATOM Airdrop New Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
TERRA2 #4837
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:New Airdrop - AtomONE
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #936
Vote:abstain
Title:Bootstrap XRP Liquidity on Osmosis
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. *
OSMOSIS #934
Vote:yes
Title:Whitelist Hydro Deployment Address to Upload Contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew changes its vote to 'Yes' in order to whitelist the Hydro deployment address for uploading multiple Oak Security–audited contracts, trusting Informal Systems’ interchain expertise and professionalism
DYDX PROTOCOL #247
Vote:yes
Title:Delist EOS, BTRUMP, and SKITTEN markets
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees with the delisting of BTRUMP, EOS, and SKITTEN from the dYdX DEX and supports the wind-down and final settlement of all related markets.
INITIA #40
Vote:no
Title:Update Embr.fun VIP Score Contract Address
Rationale:CryptoCrew declines to support Embr.fun’s contract deployment due to a lack of third-party audit disclosure, unclear contract source status, and gambling game mechanics that may endanger user funds. We also find no justification for the use of an expedited governance process
INITIA #39
Vote:abstain
Title:nitia Chain Upgrade Proposal #1: Taking Off the Training Wheels
Rationale:CryptoCrew acknowledges the Initia v1.1.0 release at block #3180000 but abstains from voting, as the proposal includes changes to the reward structure, in line with our governance stance. We encourage future proposals to separate such items for improved clarity
DYMENSION #29
Vote:yes
Title:Add USDC as a base asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of adding USDC (Noble) as a base asset to Dymension’s native DEX, enabling stable and user-friendly liquidity pairings
STARGAZE #310
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:New NFT Game
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #309
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎AtomONE Airdrop⭐ - New Airdrop! ✅
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OMNIFLIX #58
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:TRY New NFT Casino OmniFLIX .
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
AXELAR #330
Vote:abstain
Title:Create pool for xrpl Voting Verifier
Rationale:CryptoCrew is missing essential information to assess whether the proposal seeks to use community pool funds for the XRPL voting verifier pool, a determination that is crucial for upholding our abstention policy on such proposals
AXELAR #331
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade Gateway for xrpl
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves this technical upgrade for maintaining secure and efficient cross-chain operations.
AXELAR #332
Vote:yes
Title:Update Multisig Prover v1.4.1 for XRPL
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports registering the new Multisig Prover contract v1.4.1 for XRPL
AXELAR #333
Vote:yes
Title:Authorize Multisig Prover for xrpl
Rationale:CryptoCrew ratifies this change to enhance the verifier structure for XRPL with an officially authorized multisig prover
AXELAR #334
Vote:yes
Title:Create pool for xrpl Voting Verifier
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #249
Vote:yes
Title:Wind down DINNER-USD market
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of deprecating the DINNER-USD market due to potential legitimacy issues flagged by the dYdX Foundation that may endanger trader safety.
DYDX PROTOCOL #248
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
AGORIC #95
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-20
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the agoric-3 mainnet upgrade to v20, being rolled out with block #19830777, intending to upgrade orchestration vats to fix JavaScript handling of hooked IBC Packets and fixing memory leaks
INJECTIVE #529
Vote:abstain
Title:Injective Validator Network Optimization
Rationale:CryptoCrew generally supports performance optimizations, abstains though due to the validator set reduction, resulting in decreased decentralisation in contrast to the description
STARGAZE #311
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Stargaze Airdrop - Get Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #937
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:⭐Feeling Lucky? 🎰 - 💎$Get Airdrop ✅ - OSMOSIS
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #312
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $Get Airdrop - STARGAZE
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
AGORIC #97
Vote:yes
Title:Denominate swingset fees in BLD
Rationale:CryptoCrew aligns with the proposed shift to BLD for all fee-related mechanisms, reflecting the deprecation of Inter Protocol
OSMOSIS #937
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $Get Airdrop - OSMOSIS
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #313
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$ATOM Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
PERSISTENCE #136
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT rewards for June 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. *
KAVA #201
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise Payouts April 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
COSMOS HUB #999
Vote:yes
Title:Update Client: Revive client to Realio
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the IBC client recovery between the Cosmos Hub and Realio after successfully validating the client states:
----------------------------------------
Proposal title: Update Client: Revive client to Realio
Message #1: subject=07-tendermint-1157 substitute=07-tendermint-1400
Reference RPC: https://rpc.cosmos.directory:443/realio
host: 3E6932CF1EE9AD2092D0818F2DB21CAF139E598029A1EAFA33857F3F5F8DD560
reference: 3E6932CF1EE9AD2092D0818F2DB21CAF139E598029A1EAFA33857F3F5F8DD560
host: 9865FD9302EEB3FF74EFE46832D52E61295CEC7216C1AFD9B7A73C28AE91C1F3
reference: 9865FD9302EEB3FF74EFE46832D52E61295CEC7216C1AFD9B7A73C28AE91C1F3
----------------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
INITIA #42
Vote:abstain
Title:Inflation Correction and Unstaking Subsidy Plan
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. *
INITIA #43
Vote:yes
Title:Initia Chain Upgrade Proposal #1: Taking Off the Training Wheels
Rationale:CryptoCrew gladly votes Yes on the updated upgrade proposal for the Initia mainnet to version v1.1.1 at block height 3,400,000, with the inflation parameter adjustment now handled in a separate, dedicated proposal. Version v1.1.1 introduces whitelisting for emergency proposal submissions, governance control over optimistic bridge withdrawal times and rollup finalization periods, equilibrium adjustments to enshrined liquidity parameters, improvements to IBC hooks, and critical bug fixes for the fungible assets module.
OSMOSIS #939
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$OSMOSIS Airdrop - Feeling Lucky? $internet Money
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #314
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$Get Money Airdrop - Feeling Lucky?
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
NOLUS #292
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust Leaser Parameters (OSMO Short Market)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Leaser smart contract parameter updates for the Osmosis short integration on the Nolus Pirin mainnet
NOLUS #293
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust LPP Parameters (OSMO Short Market)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes Yes to align the Osmosis LPP parameters with existing lending markets and enhance consistency across the protocol
NOLUS #294
Vote:yes
Title:Register Price Feeders (Osmosis OSMO Oracle)
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves whitelisting the five mentioned price feeders to strengthen the robustness of Nolus’ Oracle system for OSMO
* Rationale condensed for readability; refer to the full version above for details.