![CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update May 2024](https://ccvalidators.com/wp-content/uploads/cryptocrew-validators-gov-update-may-2024-720x420.jpg)
CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update May 2024
10. June 2024
Dear Community, we’re pleased to update you on our May 2024 governance activities, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 109 votes across 28 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
LUM NETWORK #105 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [Cosmos Millions] INJ Pool Launch |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
SOMMELIER #154 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [SIPS-140] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Arbitrum |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
SOMMELIER #155 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [SIPS-142] Real Yield ETH Cellar Incentives |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
SOMMELIER #156 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [SIPS-143] Real Yield BTC Cellar Incentives |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
SOMMELIER #157 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [SIPS-144] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Optimism |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
SOMMELIER #158 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [SIPS-141] Proposal to Add rETH to Turbo divETH |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to add rETH as asset to deposit to the Turbo divETH vault |
JUNO #348 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Liquidity SubDAO: Withdraw Community Funds from WYND |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the move to withdraw wyJUNO from the WYND DEX, returning the $JUNO to the Liquidity SubDAO |
OSMOSIS #777 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Incentives Adjustment for May 2024 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the Osmosis Liquidity Incentives adjustments and removing classic pool incentives like accepted with proposal #774 |
OSMOSIS #778 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | IBC Rate Limit Review |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the IBC rate limit adjustments according to the proposal concerning daily / weekly deposit and withdraw limits on Osmosis intending to protect user assets in event of malitious behaviour of bug exploits |
OSMOSIS #779 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Fix SpotPrice query on Astroport PCL pools |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the SpotPrice query migration in order to fix the displayed price impact on PCL pools |
COMDEX #231 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 9 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
EVMOS #287 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | ATOM Airdrop |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
TERRA2 #4809 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎 LUNA AIRDROP Funding Program ⭐ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
DYMENSION #15 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | AMM Incentive #3 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
COSMOS HUB #917 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | [CORRECTED] DoraHacks: AEZ Quadratic Funding Program |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
PERSISTENCE #100 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | PersistenceCore v11.11.0 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Core-1 v11.11.0 upgrade, arriving at block height 16578000, fixing a x/liquidstake module issue, bumping pstake-native to v2.13.0 and cosmos-proto to v1.0.0-beta.5 |
CHIHUAHUA #74 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Reduce min inflation to 0 and max inflation to 4.20 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Chihuaha mainnet inflation parameter changes, setting inflation_max to 0.0420 and inflation_min to 0.000 |
EVMOS #288 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | VOTE YES and GET 100 ATOM |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
KUJIRA #620 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Fuzion Dustbuster v1.4.1 Smart Contract Update |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract upgrade to v.1.4.1 adding an option to query & claim Fuzion rewards independently |
EVMOS #289 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎Evmos Airdrop ✅ - Cosmos Hub Proposal ⭐ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #312 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Replace Terra Classic IBC Client 07-tendermint-0 with 07-tendermint-133 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #313 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Replace Terra Classic IBC Client 07-tendermint-0 with 07-tendermint-134 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #314 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | UST $1 Next Week |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
DYDX PROTOCOL #57 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Add TON-USD perpetual market |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports enabling the TON-USD perpetual market on the dYdX DEX |
INJECTIVE #394 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Jackpot |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the Ninja Blaze Contracts upload, citing premature deployment prior to completing security audits, a poorly presented governance proposal, and a lack of essential details on open-source status and audit outcomes. |
INJECTIVE #393 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Double |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the Ninja Blaze Contracts upload, citing premature deployment prior to completing security audits, a poorly presented governance proposal, and a lack of essential details on open-source status and audit outcomes. |
TERRA2 #4810 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Whitelisting LUNA - USDT Liquidity Pool as an Alliance Asset |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal |
TERRA2 #4811 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Whitelisting LUNA - USDT Liquidity Pool as an Alliance Asset (VOTE ON THIS PROPOSAL, IGNORE #4810) |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal |
INJECTIVE #395 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 15 April 2024 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
STARGAZE #268 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Add Code Upload Params Addresses |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes authorizing Racoon Supply's development address for contract uploads, citing a lack of transparency about the code's open-source status and whether it has been audited |
KUJIRA #621 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Deploying the Price Engine Contract for Yield Harbour and Kujira Community. |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew withholds approval for the Yield Harbour Price Engine Contract, criticizing the lack of detailed security information, missing audit disclosures, governance discussions, and unclear details about the entity responsible for the contract creation |
BITSONG #35 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Funding BTSG/ARCH Pool on Astrovault DEX |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
AXELAR #206 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Interlinked DAO Ecosystem X Proposal |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
STARGAZE #268 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Add Code Upload Params Addresses |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to vote "yes" on whitelisting Racoon Supply's address, motivated by their track record and delivery of valuable tools |
AGORIC #74 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-15 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the agoric-upgrade to v15, arriving at block 15008615 |
NOLUS #116 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Osmosis Noble USDC Pool) |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the parameter changes on the Osmosis Noble USDC Liquidity Providers' Pool Contract |
OSMOSIS #780 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Implement Copy-Staking for Stride's Osmosis Delegations |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports Stride's copy-staking implementation for Osmosis delegations as stated within the proposal |
OSMOSIS #782 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Osmosis v25 Software Upgrade |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Osmosis Mainnet Upgrade to v25.0.0, arriving at block 15753500, delivering the implementation of Top of Block Auctions, gas price calculation improvements, shorter block times, consensus parameter updates, smart accounts and multiple patches |
OSMOSIS #781 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update ATOM/stkATOM Scaling Factor Controller to Osmosis Pool Ratesync Contract |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of automating the scaling factor update for stkToken stableswap pools by changing the scaling factor controller address of the ATOM/stkATOM pool from the multisig to the Pool Ratesync Contract address |
JUNO #349 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Signal proposal for the council to put dapps as the first priority |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew acknowledges the initiative to activate the Juno community, yet chooses to abstain because the proposal lacks clarity and does not clearly define the implications of the vote, which does not align with responsible governance practices |
KUJIRA #622 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Quark Unifier v1.1.2 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Quark Unifier upgrade to v1.1.2, fixing a minor reward distribution bug |
KUJIRA #623 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Fuzion Dustbuster v1.4.2 Smart Contract Update |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract upgrade to v1.4.2, updating the Kujira rewards query and adding optional max_validators parameter |
COSMOS HUB #919 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Avail x Cosmos airdrop |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
INJECTIVE #396 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Gravedigger 1/2 - feesplit |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports Backbone Labs' audited & testnet proven Gravedigger LSD Steak and Fee-collector smart contracts deployment to the Injective mainnet |
INJECTIVE #397 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Gravedigger 2/2 - staking contract |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports Backbone Labs' audited & testnet proven Gravedigger LSD Steak and Fee-collector smart contracts deployment to the Injective mainnet |
COSMOS HUB #920 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Grace (Cosmos Nanny) |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values |
COSMOS HUB #921 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Matt Brown |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values |
COSMOS HUB #922 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Clyde Carver |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values |
LUM NETWORK #106 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Upgrade core v1.6.6 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Lum Network upgrade to v1.6.6, arriving at block 12969000 |
KAVA #179 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Kava Rise payouts for April 2024 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
PERSISTENCE #101 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Incentivization of stkXPRT/XPRT Metastable pool with stkXPRT rewards |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
PERSISTENCE #102 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Create new WBTC/XPRT Weighted Pool on Dexter |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew aggrees to create a WBTC/XPRT weighted pool on Dexter with parameters according to the proposal |
OMNIFLIX #37 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | MEXC Listing using funds from StreamSwap & FLIX from the Community Pool |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
INJECTIVE #398 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | UPLOAD Discoverinj 404 Reroll |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against uploading the Discoverinj contracts due to missing information about successful third party audits |
INJECTIVE #399 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Upload Exotic Escrow Contract Wasm Code |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew suggests governance forum discussions and access to code audits prior to Exotic Contracts upload to protect the Injective ecosystem from potential risks |
STARGAZE #269 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Collection Creation Fee in USDC |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to switch from $STARS to $USDC collection creation fees in order to improve UX for creators and have stable instead of fluctuating fees |
KUJIRA #624 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Create DAO: $YUM Treasury |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal |
KUJIRA #625 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Create DAO: $YUM Treasury |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the creation of the $YUM DAO creation |
NOLUS #117 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Create a Nolus Governance Controlled ICA on Neutron |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of creating an ICA on Neutron |
EVMOS #290 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Inferno 5.0 - Continuing Forge LP Incentives |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
KUJIRA #626 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Create DAO: MantaDAO Ops Multisig |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the MantaDAO Ops Multisig instantiation |
SECRET NETWORK #300 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Secret Network v1.13 Upgrade |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Secret Network v1.13 upgrade, arriving at block 14360000, adding DCAP attestation support, migrating to SGX 2.20 and bumping ibc-go to v4.6.0 |
STARGAZE #270 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Lottery Game Smart Contract |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the Emberplay smart contract proposal due to the lack of audit details and the only recently established developer's GitHub account without prior activity leading up to Emberplay's deployment. We also believe that it is not the responsibility or within the resources of validators to review code from various deployers as suggested in the governance forum. Instead, it is the duty of the deployers to ensure and demonstrate that their code is secure and does not pose a risk to user funds |
KUJIRA #627 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Signaling Proposal: Unstake Self-Governance |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the self-governed DAO creation for Unstake, putting the governance control towards $NSTK holders |
INJECTIVE #400 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Upload NFT Injstaking Contract |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has not changed it's stance towards the Injstaking contracts since proposal #350 and withholds support for uploading it to the Injective Mainnet, citing the absence of essential details regarding the code, lack of code audits, insufficient project discourse, and If user assets are protected or exposed to threats |
EVMOS #291 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Pandora Evmos |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
ARCHWAY #44 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Signaling Proposal: Creation of a Conflict Resolution Council |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the establishment of a conflict resolution council as outlined in the Archway governance forum |
CHIHUAHUA #75 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Upgrade v7 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of upgrading the Chihuahua Mainnet to v7 with block 12900000, integrating an upgraded Token Factory Module, new Liquidity Module and some version bumps |
COSMOS HUB #924 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Gaia v17 Software Upgrade |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Gaia v17 software upgrade, adding Partial Set Security to the Cosmos Hub mainnet, making Stride and Neutron Top N=95% chains, arriving at block 20739800 |
GRAVITY BRIDGE #230 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Increase Gravity Bridge chain fee |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the chain fee raise from 1 to 3 basis points |
PERSISTENCE #103 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Fix Configuration for Upgraded Dexter pool smart contracts |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a positive vote to implement the configuration corrections to ensure the proper smart contract functionality, namely creating new weighted and stableswap pool contracts by the Dexter Vault contract |
PERSISTENCE #104 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Create new WBTC/XPRT Weighted Pool on Dexter |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the WBTC-XPRT pool creation with the parameters outlined in the proposal |
PERSISTENCE #105 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | PersistenceCore v11.12.0 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the Persistence Core-v1 upgrade to v11.12.0 at block 16851000, fixing the autocompounding issue with x/liquidstake |
OSMOSIS #783 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Upload Transmuter v3 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Transmuter v3 contract upload which allows 1:1 asset conversion, implementing new functionality as stated within the proposal |
NOLUS #118 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to switch from NLS/axlUSDC pool #1041 to NLS/USDC #1797, migrating pool liquidity and introducing CUDOS as asset for leasing |
TERITORI #39 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Reduce Maximum Block Size to 5MiB |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of reducing the maximum block size parameter "max_bytes" to "5242880" to improve network stabilty |
TERITORI #40 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Increase TxSizeCostPerByte 15x |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports raising the "tx_size_cost_per_byte" parameter by x15 to "150" |
MARS #187 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | TIA Listing - Neutron Outpost |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes listing Celestia's native token TIA as a collateral on the Neutron outpost of the Red Bank |
MARS #188 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Remove Swap Route Verification - Osmosis Outpost |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the contract logic modification to support dynamic routing and eliminate the need for route validation |
MARS #189 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | stkATOM Redemption Rate - Neutron Outpost |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the stkATOM market update on the Neutron Outpost to utilize Persistence's redemption rate contract, increasing the oracle robustness of this market |
NOLUS #119 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Increase Voting Period |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the voting period increasal from one to three days |
NOLUS #120 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis axlUSDC) |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to update the Oracle swap tree for the Osmosis axlUSDC pools, stATOM pool #1136 to #1283 and the NLS/axlUSDC to the NLS/USDC pool |
STARGAZE #271 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Signaling Prop: Upload Pre-Mint Auction Contract |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of the Pre-Mint auction contract to the Stargaze Mainnet |
DYMENSION #16 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Lock staking rewards for locked up accounts |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against the locking of $DYM tokens or rewards, emphasizing the need for comprehensive discussions in the governance forum prior to the introduction of proposals and considering potential legal implications before going live |
KUJIRA #628 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | AQLA staking & rewards contracts upload |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against uploading the AQLA contract due to missing information about the code, governance forum discussion and security implications regarding user funds |
ARCHWAY #16 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | ARCH incentives for ARCH |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
EVMOS #292 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Pandora Airdrop Evmos 2.0 Version |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #315 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | Cosmos Hub Airdrop |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #316 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #317 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #318 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
CRESCENT #319 | |
Vote: | no_with_veto |
Title: | 💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy |
MIGALOO #39 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update ReStake DAO Alliance |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of the ReStake DAO's Alliance reward weight adjustments |
MIGALOO #40 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update boneOsmo Alliance |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the boneOsmo Alliance reward weight and take-rate changes |
MIGALOO #41 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update ampOsmo Alliance |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of the ampOsmo Alliance reward weight and take rate adjustments |
SECRET NETWORK #301 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Support Team Funding Proposal |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
DYMENSION #17 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Whitelist Mande RollApp deployer |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew is positive about introducing the Mande RollApp on Dymension but abstains from approval due to its beta status; we await an audit that certifies its stability and security to protect user funds |
DYDX PROTOCOL #58 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Add W-USD perpetual market |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the W-USD perp market deployment on the DYDX DEX |
SOMMELIER #159 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Update Token Prices - May 2024 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to update existing SOMM token prices within the x/cellarfees and x/auction modules |
KUJIRA #629 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Quark: AQLA Hub |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against uploading the AQLA contract due to missing information about the code, governance forum discussion and security implications regarding user funds |
OSMOSIS #784 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Review Downtime Jailing Parameters |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the downtime jailing / slashing parameter adjustments to 80% signed blocks within a 80k blocks window |
PERSISTENCE #106 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | Recover Carbon IBC transfer channel |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the recovery of the Carbon IBC channel after successfully verifying the validity of the clients >>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-170 - last revision: 1 height: 56486709 host: 417E2B1EC23541E676DF5292C8D704F310E64E5F44C713295E7A94117257E293 | reference: 417E2B1EC23541E676DF5292C8D704F310E64E5F44C713295E7A94117257E293 <<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-178 - last revision: 1 height: 58050339 host: E4907DC9F5BC0FEF67690F264DF2840542C5D80D5FE6F288BDABF6FBA9A95F1E | reference: E4907DC9F5BC0FEF67690F264DF2840542C5D80D5FE6F288BDABF6FBA9A95F1E ---------------------------------- ✅ subject client valid! ✅ substitute client valid! |
OSMOSIS #785 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Whitelist Address for Mad Pots Game Deployment |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the initiative behind Mad Pods but opts to vote no to ensure user fund safety, awaiting thorough testnet trial deployment and independent third-party code audit results |
TERRA2 #4812 | |
Vote: | no |
Title: | Whitelisting ATOM - LUNA LP Token as an Alliance Asset |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting the ATOM-LUNA LP token as an alliance asset |
AXELAR #207 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | BonusBlock: Axelar Explorers Program Grant Proposal |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
OSMOSIS #786 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Matching incentives for Frax assets on Osmosis with Picasso |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
PERSISTENCE #107 | |
Vote: | abstain |
Title: | Incentivization of Dexter pools with XPRT, stkXPRT, and PSTAKE rewards for June 2024 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
PERSISTENCE #108 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | PersistenceCore v11.13.0 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Core-1 upgrade to v11.13.0, arriving at block 16980000, fixing info log spam and updating pstake to unblock liquidstaking from Cosmos Hub |
DYDX PROTOCOL #59 | |
Vote: | yes |
Title: | dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v5.0.0 |
Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v5.0.0 with block 17560000, implementing a plethora of changes like isolated markets, batch order cancellations, protocol enshrined LP vaults, slinky sidecar/vote extensions, performance improvements soft open interest caps, full node streaming, bug fixes and version updates like go 1.22, cosmos fork v0.50.5, upgrade handler v5 |