Blog
CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update May 2024

CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update May 2024

10. June 2024

Dear Community, we’re pleased to update you on our May 2024 governance activities, where we engaged in screening over 40 networks and cast 109 votes across 28 chains, prioritizing the communities’ best interests within the Cosmos ecosystem.

Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.

 
LUM NETWORK #105
Vote:abstain
Title:[Cosmos Millions] INJ Pool Launch
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #154
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-140] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Arbitrum
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #155
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-142] Real Yield ETH Cellar Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #156
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-143] Real Yield BTC Cellar Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #157
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-144] Incentives Proposal for Real Yield ETH Optimism
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SOMMELIER #158
Vote:abstain
Title:[SIPS-141] Proposal to Add rETH to Turbo divETH
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to add rETH as asset to deposit to the Turbo divETH vault
JUNO #348
Vote:yes
Title:Liquidity SubDAO: Withdraw Community Funds from WYND
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the move to withdraw wyJUNO from the WYND DEX, returning the $JUNO to the Liquidity SubDAO
OSMOSIS #777
Vote:yes
Title:Incentives Adjustment for May 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Osmosis Liquidity Incentives adjustments and removing classic pool incentives like accepted with proposal #774
OSMOSIS #778
Vote:yes
Title:IBC Rate Limit Review
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the IBC rate limit adjustments according to the proposal concerning daily / weekly deposit and withdraw limits on Osmosis intending to protect user assets in event of malitious behaviour of bug exploits
OSMOSIS #779
Vote:yes
Title:Fix SpotPrice query on Astroport PCL pools
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the SpotPrice query migration in order to fix the displayed price impact on PCL pools
COMDEX #231
Vote:abstain
Title:Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools - Revamped Reward Distribution : Phase 9
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
EVMOS #287
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:ATOM Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
TERRA2 #4809
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎 LUNA AIRDROP Funding Program ⭐
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
DYMENSION #15
Vote:abstain
Title:AMM Incentive #3
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
COSMOS HUB #917
Vote:abstain
Title:[CORRECTED] DoraHacks: AEZ Quadratic Funding Program
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #100
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11.11.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Core-1 v11.11.0 upgrade, arriving at block height 16578000, fixing a x/liquidstake module issue, bumping pstake-native to v2.13.0 and cosmos-proto to v1.0.0-beta.5
CHIHUAHUA #74
Vote:yes
Title:Reduce min inflation to 0 and max inflation to 4.20
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Chihuaha mainnet inflation parameter changes, setting inflation_max to 0.0420 and inflation_min to 0.000
EVMOS #288
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:VOTE YES and GET 100 ATOM
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
KUJIRA #620
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion Dustbuster v1.4.1 Smart Contract Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract upgrade to v.1.4.1 adding an option to query & claim Fuzion rewards independently
EVMOS #289
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎Evmos Airdrop ✅ - Cosmos Hub Proposal ⭐
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #312
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Replace Terra Classic IBC Client 07-tendermint-0 with 07-tendermint-133
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #313
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Replace Terra Classic IBC Client 07-tendermint-0 with 07-tendermint-134
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #314
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:UST $1 Next Week
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
DYDX PROTOCOL #57
Vote:yes
Title:Add TON-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports enabling the TON-USD perpetual market on the dYdX DEX
INJECTIVE #394
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Jackpot
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the Ninja Blaze Contracts upload, citing premature deployment prior to completing security audits, a poorly presented governance proposal, and a lack of essential details on open-source status and audit outcomes.
INJECTIVE #393
Vote:no
Title:Upload Ninja Blaze Contract - Double
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the Ninja Blaze Contracts upload, citing premature deployment prior to completing security audits, a poorly presented governance proposal, and a lack of essential details on open-source status and audit outcomes.
TERRA2 #4810
Vote:no
Title:Whitelisting LUNA - USDT Liquidity Pool as an Alliance Asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal
TERRA2 #4811
Vote:no
Title:Whitelisting LUNA - USDT Liquidity Pool as an Alliance Asset (VOTE ON THIS PROPOSAL, IGNORE #4810)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal
INJECTIVE #395
Vote:abstain
Title:Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 15 April 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #268
Vote:no
Title:Add Code Upload Params Addresses
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes authorizing Racoon Supply's development address for contract uploads, citing a lack of transparency about the code's open-source status and whether it has been audited
KUJIRA #621
Vote:no
Title:Deploying the Price Engine Contract for Yield Harbour and Kujira Community.
Rationale:CryptoCrew withholds approval for the Yield Harbour Price Engine Contract, criticizing the lack of detailed security information, missing audit disclosures, governance discussions, and unclear details about the entity responsible for the contract creation
BITSONG #35
Vote:abstain
Title:Funding BTSG/ARCH Pool on Astrovault DEX
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
AXELAR #206
Vote:abstain
Title:Interlinked DAO Ecosystem X Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #268
Vote:yes
Title:Add Code Upload Params Addresses
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to vote "yes" on whitelisting Racoon Supply's address, motivated by their track record and delivery of valuable tools
AGORIC #74
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade to agoric-upgrade-15
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the agoric-upgrade to v15, arriving at block 15008615
NOLUS #116
Vote:yes
Title:Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Osmosis Noble USDC Pool)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the parameter changes on the Osmosis Noble USDC Liquidity Providers' Pool Contract
OSMOSIS #780
Vote:yes
Title:Implement Copy-Staking for Stride's Osmosis Delegations
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Stride's copy-staking implementation for Osmosis delegations as stated within the proposal
OSMOSIS #782
Vote:yes
Title:Osmosis v25 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Osmosis Mainnet Upgrade to v25.0.0, arriving at block 15753500, delivering the implementation of Top of Block Auctions, gas price calculation improvements, shorter block times, consensus parameter updates, smart accounts and multiple patches
OSMOSIS #781
Vote:yes
Title:Update ATOM/stkATOM Scaling Factor Controller to Osmosis Pool Ratesync Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of automating the scaling factor update for stkToken stableswap pools by changing the scaling factor controller address of the ATOM/stkATOM pool from the multisig to the Pool Ratesync Contract address
JUNO #349
Vote:abstain
Title:Signal proposal for the council to put dapps as the first priority
Rationale:CryptoCrew acknowledges the initiative to activate the Juno community, yet chooses to abstain because the proposal lacks clarity and does not clearly define the implications of the vote, which does not align with responsible governance practices
KUJIRA #622
Vote:yes
Title:Quark Unifier v1.1.2
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Quark Unifier upgrade to v1.1.2, fixing a minor reward distribution bug
KUJIRA #623
Vote:yes
Title:Fuzion Dustbuster v1.4.2 Smart Contract Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Fuzion Dustbuster Smart Contract upgrade to v1.4.2, updating the Kujira rewards query and adding optional max_validators parameter
COSMOS HUB #919
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Avail x Cosmos airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they may lead to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
INJECTIVE #396
Vote:yes
Title:Gravedigger 1/2 - feesplit
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Backbone Labs' audited & testnet proven Gravedigger LSD Steak and Fee-collector smart contracts deployment to the Injective mainnet
INJECTIVE #397
Vote:yes
Title:Gravedigger 2/2 - staking contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports Backbone Labs' audited & testnet proven Gravedigger LSD Steak and Fee-collector smart contracts deployment to the Injective mainnet
COSMOS HUB #920
Vote:abstain
Title:AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Grace (Cosmos Nanny)
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values
COSMOS HUB #921
Vote:abstain
Title:AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Matt Brown
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values
COSMOS HUB #922
Vote:abstain
Title:AADAO Oversight Election: Vote for Clyde Carver
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting in the AADAO Oversight Committee Member Elections, instead encouraging the Cosmos Hub Community to elect candidates that best align with community interests and values
LUM NETWORK #106
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade core v1.6.6
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Lum Network upgrade to v1.6.6, arriving at block 12969000
KAVA #179
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise payouts for April 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #101
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of stkXPRT/XPRT Metastable pool with stkXPRT rewards
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #102
Vote:yes
Title:Create new WBTC/XPRT Weighted Pool on Dexter
Rationale:CryptoCrew aggrees to create a WBTC/XPRT weighted pool on Dexter with parameters according to the proposal
OMNIFLIX #37
Vote:abstain
Title:MEXC Listing using funds from StreamSwap & FLIX from the Community Pool
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #398
Vote:no
Title:UPLOAD Discoverinj 404 Reroll
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against uploading the Discoverinj contracts due to missing information about successful third party audits
INJECTIVE #399
Vote:no
Title:Upload Exotic Escrow Contract Wasm Code
Rationale:CryptoCrew suggests governance forum discussions and access to code audits prior to Exotic Contracts upload to protect the Injective ecosystem from potential risks
STARGAZE #269
Vote:yes
Title:Collection Creation Fee in USDC
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to switch from $STARS to $USDC collection creation fees in order to improve UX for creators and have stable instead of fluctuating fees
KUJIRA #624
Vote:no
Title:Create DAO: $YUM Treasury
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous proposal
KUJIRA #625
Vote:yes
Title:Create DAO: $YUM Treasury
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the creation of the $YUM DAO creation
NOLUS #117
Vote:yes
Title:Create a Nolus Governance Controlled ICA on Neutron
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of creating an ICA on Neutron
EVMOS #290
Vote:abstain
Title:Inferno 5.0 - Continuing Forge LP Incentives
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KUJIRA #626
Vote:yes
Title:Create DAO: MantaDAO Ops Multisig
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the MantaDAO Ops Multisig instantiation
SECRET NETWORK #300
Vote:yes
Title:Secret Network v1.13 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Secret Network v1.13 upgrade, arriving at block 14360000, adding DCAP attestation support, migrating to SGX 2.20 and bumping ibc-go to v4.6.0
STARGAZE #270
Vote:no
Title:Lottery Game Smart Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the Emberplay smart contract proposal due to the lack of audit details and the only recently established developer's GitHub account without prior activity leading up to Emberplay's deployment. We also believe that it is not the responsibility or within the resources of validators to review code from various deployers as suggested in the governance forum. Instead, it is the duty of the deployers to ensure and demonstrate that their code is secure and does not pose a risk to user funds
KUJIRA #627
Vote:yes
Title:Signaling Proposal: Unstake Self-Governance
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the self-governed DAO creation for Unstake, putting the governance control towards $NSTK holders
INJECTIVE #400
Vote:no
Title:Upload NFT Injstaking Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew has not changed it's stance towards the Injstaking contracts since proposal #350 and withholds support for uploading it to the Injective Mainnet, citing the absence of essential details regarding the code, lack of code audits, insufficient project discourse, and If user assets are protected or exposed to threats
EVMOS #291
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Pandora Evmos
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
ARCHWAY #44
Vote:yes
Title:Signaling Proposal: Creation of a Conflict Resolution Council
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the establishment of a conflict resolution council as outlined in the Archway governance forum
CHIHUAHUA #75
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade v7
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of upgrading the Chihuahua Mainnet to v7 with block 12900000, integrating an upgraded Token Factory Module, new Liquidity Module and some version bumps
COSMOS HUB #924
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v17 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Gaia v17 software upgrade, adding Partial Set Security to the Cosmos Hub mainnet, making Stride and Neutron Top N=95% chains, arriving at block 20739800
GRAVITY BRIDGE #230
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Gravity Bridge chain fee
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the chain fee raise from 1 to 3 basis points
PERSISTENCE #103
Vote:yes
Title:Fix Configuration for Upgraded Dexter pool smart contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a positive vote to implement the configuration corrections to ensure the proper smart contract functionality, namely creating new weighted and stableswap pool contracts by the Dexter Vault contract
PERSISTENCE #104
Vote:yes
Title:Create new WBTC/XPRT Weighted Pool on Dexter
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the WBTC-XPRT pool creation with the parameters outlined in the proposal
PERSISTENCE #105
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11.12.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in support of the Persistence Core-v1 upgrade to v11.12.0 at block 16851000, fixing the autocompounding issue with x/liquidstake
OSMOSIS #783
Vote:yes
Title:Upload Transmuter v3
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Transmuter v3 contract upload which allows 1:1 asset conversion, implementing new functionality as stated within the proposal
NOLUS #118
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to switch from NLS/axlUSDC pool #1041 to NLS/USDC #1797, migrating pool liquidity and introducing CUDOS as asset for leasing
TERITORI #39
Vote:yes
Title:Reduce Maximum Block Size to 5MiB
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favour of reducing the maximum block size parameter "max_bytes" to "5242880" to improve network stabilty
TERITORI #40
Vote:yes
Title:Increase TxSizeCostPerByte 15x
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports raising the "tx_size_cost_per_byte" parameter by x15 to "150"
MARS #187
Vote:yes
Title:TIA Listing - Neutron Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes listing Celestia's native token TIA as a collateral on the Neutron outpost of the Red Bank
MARS #188
Vote:yes
Title:Remove Swap Route Verification - Osmosis Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the contract logic modification to support dynamic routing and eliminate the need for route validation
MARS #189
Vote:yes
Title:stkATOM Redemption Rate - Neutron Outpost
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the stkATOM market update on the Neutron Outpost to utilize Persistence's redemption rate contract, increasing the oracle robustness of this market
NOLUS #119
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Voting Period
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the voting period increasal from one to three days
NOLUS #120
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis axlUSDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to update the Oracle swap tree for the Osmosis axlUSDC pools, stATOM pool #1136 to #1283 and the NLS/axlUSDC to the NLS/USDC pool
STARGAZE #271
Vote:yes
Title:Signaling Prop: Upload Pre-Mint Auction Contract
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in support of the Pre-Mint auction contract to the Stargaze Mainnet
DYMENSION #16
Vote:no
Title:Lock staking rewards for locked up accounts
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against the locking of $DYM tokens or rewards, emphasizing the need for comprehensive discussions in the governance forum prior to the introduction of proposals and considering potential legal implications before going live
KUJIRA #628
Vote:no
Title:AQLA staking & rewards contracts upload
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against uploading the AQLA contract due to missing information about the code, governance forum discussion and security implications regarding user funds
ARCHWAY #16
Vote:abstain
Title:ARCH incentives for ARCH
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
EVMOS #292
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Pandora Airdrop Evmos 2.0 Version
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #315
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Cosmos Hub Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #316
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #317
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #318
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
CRESCENT #319
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎ATOM Airdrop ⚛️
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises users to avoid clicking on any links contained within this proposal, as they are leading to malicious websites that could compromise user security and privacy
MIGALOO #39
Vote:yes
Title:Update ReStake DAO Alliance
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in support of the ReStake DAO's Alliance reward weight adjustments
MIGALOO #40
Vote:yes
Title:Update boneOsmo Alliance
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the boneOsmo Alliance reward weight and take-rate changes
MIGALOO #41
Vote:yes
Title:Update ampOsmo Alliance
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of the ampOsmo Alliance reward weight and take rate adjustments
SECRET NETWORK #301
Vote:abstain
Title:Support Team Funding Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYMENSION #17
Vote:abstain
Title:Whitelist Mande RollApp deployer
Rationale:CryptoCrew is positive about introducing the Mande RollApp on Dymension but abstains from approval due to its beta status; we await an audit that certifies its stability and security to protect user funds
DYDX PROTOCOL #58
Vote:yes
Title:Add W-USD perpetual market
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the W-USD perp market deployment on the DYDX DEX
SOMMELIER #159
Vote:yes
Title:Update Token Prices - May 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to update existing SOMM token prices within the x/cellarfees and x/auction modules
KUJIRA #629
Vote:no
Title:Quark: AQLA Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against uploading the AQLA contract due to missing information about the code, governance forum discussion and security implications regarding user funds
OSMOSIS #784
Vote:yes
Title:Review Downtime Jailing Parameters
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the downtime jailing / slashing parameter adjustments to 80% signed blocks within a 80k blocks window
PERSISTENCE #106
Vote:yes
Title:Recover Carbon IBC transfer channel
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the recovery of the Carbon IBC channel after successfully verifying the validity of the clients

>>> subject client id: 07-tendermint-170 - last revision: 1 height: 56486709
host: 417E2B1EC23541E676DF5292C8D704F310E64E5F44C713295E7A94117257E293 | reference: 417E2B1EC23541E676DF5292C8D704F310E64E5F44C713295E7A94117257E293
<<< substit client id: 07-tendermint-178 - last revision: 1 height: 58050339
host: E4907DC9F5BC0FEF67690F264DF2840542C5D80D5FE6F288BDABF6FBA9A95F1E | reference: E4907DC9F5BC0FEF67690F264DF2840542C5D80D5FE6F288BDABF6FBA9A95F1E
----------------------------------
✅ subject client valid!
✅ substitute client valid!
OSMOSIS #785
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Address for Mad Pots Game Deployment
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the initiative behind Mad Pods but opts to vote no to ensure user fund safety, awaiting thorough testnet trial deployment and independent third-party code audit results
TERRA2 #4812
Vote:no
Title:Whitelisting ATOM - LUNA LP Token as an Alliance Asset
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting the ATOM-LUNA LP token as an alliance asset
AXELAR #207
Vote:abstain
Title:BonusBlock: Axelar Explorers Program Grant Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #786
Vote:abstain
Title:Matching incentives for Frax assets on Osmosis with Picasso
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #107
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Dexter pools with XPRT, stkXPRT, and PSTAKE rewards for June 2024
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
PERSISTENCE #108
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11.13.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Persistence Core-1 upgrade to v11.13.0, arriving at block 16980000, fixing info log spam and updating pstake to unblock liquidstaking from Cosmos Hub
DYDX PROTOCOL #59
Vote:yes
Title:dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v5.0.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v5.0.0 with block 17560000, implementing a plethora of changes like isolated markets, batch order cancellations, protocol enshrined LP vaults, slinky sidecar/vote extensions, performance improvements soft open interest caps, full node streaming, bug fixes and version updates like go 1.22, cosmos fork v0.50.5, upgrade handler v5

You may also like

Contact & Support

support@ccvalidators.com | office@ccvalidators.com | info@ccvalidators.com

Partners & collaborators