Blog

CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update June 2025

4. July 2025

Dear Community,

We are delighted to share an update on our governance activities for June 2025. This month, we diligently screened more than 35 networks and participated in voting on 84 proposals across 20 different chains, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators.

Your delegations allow us to maintain the high quality of this service and effectively represent our collective interests. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your own preferences on any active proposal. We sincerely appreciate your trust and support.

Kind regards, the CryptoCrew Team ✅

 
DYDX PROTOCOL #250
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #251
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce the active validator set to 50
Rationale:CryptoCrew aligns with the goal of improving chain performance but abstains from decisions that alter validator sets, as they affect reward distribution and reduce decentralization
STARGAZE #315
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$Get Airdrop - STARGAZE
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
OSMOSIS #940
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Deposit for Proposals to 6000 OSMO
Rationale:CryptoCrew gladly supports setting the minimum governance proposal deposit to 6000 OSMO as a response to the recent increase in spam proposals
OSMOSIS #941
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed XRP: Add XRP.int3
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees with the inclusion of XRP.int3, bridged via Bitfrost, in the Alloyed XRP portfolio to strengthen its utility on Osmosis
OSMOSIS #942
Vote:abstain
Title:Bitfrost Revenue Share
Rationale:CryptoCrew would agree with the integration intent but abstains due to potential effects on validator and delegator rewards - as we usually abstain from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #943
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed DOGE: Add ckDOGE
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the inclusion of ckDOGE, bridged via the ICP-powered Omnity bridge, in the DOGE Alloy on Osmosis while applying a 20% static limit
INJECTIVE #530
Vote:yes
Title:Update Minimum Price and Quantity Tick Sizes for PUGGO/INJ market on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees with the proposed tick size update to reduce order fragmentation and improve trading
STARGAZE #316
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:⭐Feeling Lucky? 🎰 - 💎$Get Airdrop ✅ - STARGAZE
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
INJECTIVE #531
Vote:yes
Title:Update Various Oracle Feeds on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew acknowledges the update of the mentioned perp markets to Pyth oracles as a step toward increasing market decentralization
NOLUS #295
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $Get Airdrop - NOLUS
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
STARGAZE #317
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎$Get Airdrop ✅ - STARGAZE
Rationale:CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy
COSMOS HUB #1000
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v24 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Cosmos Hub Gaia v24 upgrade at block #26131400, introducing the audited x/liquid module to enable native liquid staking token issuance and marking a key step toward unforking the Hub from the Cosmos SDK to reduce technical debt and streamline future development, while also upgrading major dependencies including ibc-go v10.1.0, cosmossdk.io/store v1.1.2, cosmossdk.io/log v1.5.1, and github.com/spf13/viper v1.20.0
OSMOSIS #945
Vote:abstain
Title:Monthly BTC Purchase: May 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #944
Vote:abstain
Title:Monthly OSMO Taker Fee Burn: May 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
TERRA2 #4838
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Minimum Deposit Amount for Terra Governance to 5000 LUNA
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves rising the minimum governance proposal deposit to 5000 LUNA to deter spam proposals
OSMOSIS #946
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist CryptoGopniks Address to Upload Contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew opposes the proposal to whitelist the CryptoGopniks developer address for contract deployment, due to their documented history on the Stargaze Zone of bypassing governance safeguards by deploying an unauthorized and unaudited bridge contract outside the scope of their originally approved mandate. This behavior led to the revocation of their whitelist status via governance and raises significant concerns regarding user safety and protocol integrity on Osmosis.
SECRET NETWORK #325
Vote:abstain
Title:Support IBC Relayers with Fee Grants IV
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
NOLUS #296
Vote:yes
Title:Increase Minimum Deposit for Proposals
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the increase to 20k NLS (regular) and 30k NLS (expedited) to protect Nolus governance from scam proposals containing malicious links
CHIHUAHUA #92
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade v9.0.4
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in support of the Chihuahua mainnet upgrade to v9.0.4, arriving at block #18385000
OMNIFLIX #60
Vote:yes
Title:Whitelist address to deploy & manage Channel Contracts v2 on OmniFlix Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees with this controlled deployment approach for Channel Contracts v2, which leverages a secure 4-of-5 multisig to enable timely feature rollouts while preserving governance oversight, minimizing risk, and maintaining an on-chain audit trail.
OMNIFLIX #61
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $WIN & PLAY - New Game!
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
SECRET NETWORK #326
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Params
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #252
Vote:abstain
Title:Surge Season 2 Incentive Distribution Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #253
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OSMOSIS #947
Vote:yes
Title:Alloyed SOL: Add SOL.int3
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the integration of SOL.int3, bridged via Int3face, into Alloyed SOL on the Osmosis DEX with a 10% static limit, supporting Solana diversification while maintaining risk controls.
INITIA #44
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Echelon's VIP Stage 3 Scoring
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #532
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist Timeworx.io Address for Wasm Upload
Rationale:CryptoCrew refrains from supporting the Timeworx.io whitelisting proposal due to the lack of transparency around the CosmWasm contracts, absence of a public third-party audit, unclear source code accessibility, and the lack of a formal introduction to the Injective community via the governance forum.
NOLUS #297
Vote:yes
Title:Pirin v0.8.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the Nolus Pirin mainnet upgrade to v0.8.0 at block #13560000, which introduces 0.5s faster block times and upgrades to cosmos-sdk v0.53.0 (with unordered transactions), linter v2, wasmvm v2.2.3, wasmd v0.54.0, and ibc-go v10.2.0, alongside multiple bug fixes and codebase cleanups
STARGAZE #318
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $Get Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
INITIA #45
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Echelon's VIP Stage 3 Scoring #2
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #319
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:Feeling Lucky? - $Get Airdrop - STARGAZE
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
INJECTIVE #533
Vote:yes
Title:Update Various Oracle Feeds and iAsset Hourly Funding Rate Caps on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the transition to Pyth price feeds for SIGN/USDT and KAITO/USDT to enhance oracle decentralization across key perp markets
AGORIC #98
Vote:yes
Title:reset MintLimit to 1M IST in PSMs for USDC, USDT
Rationale:CryptoCrew aligns with the transition away from Inter Protocol and supports resetting the MintLimit to 1M IST for USDC and USDT PSMs as a measured step to maintain IST liquidity in the short term while prioritizing stability and minimizing new systemic risk.
COSMOS HUB #1001
Vote:no
Title:Whitelist BackBone Labs Developer Wallet for BackBone Labs Smart Contracts
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes No as the proposal mistakenly replaces the entire whitelist with a single address, unintentionally revoking all previously approved addresses.
AKASH NETWORK #290
Vote:abstain
Title:AEP 62, 63, & 64 - New Features and Quality of Life Improvements for the Akash Network
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OMNIFLIX #62
Vote:yes
Title:OmniFlix Hub v6 Upgrade — Introducing the MediaNode Module
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the OmniFlix Hub mainnet upgrade to v6.0.0 at block #18004800, bringing essential improvements such as the on-chain medianode module powering OmniFlix TV, the new feemarket module (v1.1.1), and support for dynamic creator assets.
DYDX PROTOCOL #254
Vote:yes
Title:Cease Support for the wethDYDX Smart Contract (the Bridge)
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the proposal to disable the wethDYDX bridge, marking the final step in the community-approved transition away from ethDYDX. We strongly encourage all ethDYDX holders to bridge their tokens to the dYdX Chain before June 9, 2025, as the bridge will be permanently disabled and unconverted tokens will no longer be transferable across chains
NOLUS #298
Vote:yes
Title:Pin Contract Codes (v0.8.12)
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the pinning of 63 contract IDs associated with the newly stored v0.8.12 codes of the Nolus protocol smart contracts, including all 10 market instances and 3 platform core contracts, effectively reducing tx gas costs by avoiding repeated storage reads
XION #40
Vote:yes
Title:Software Upgrade v19
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Xion Mainnet upgrade to v19.0.1 at block #9150000, which introduces minor but important refinements including fixes to swagger formatting and golangci-lint configuration, along with improvements to governance message routing and upgrades to the FeeAbs module and ICA Host Keeper initialization logic. The upgrade also includes updates to key dependencies in go.mod to resolve upstream deprecations and security concerns.
STARGAZE #320
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:💎$STARGAZE Airdrop ✅⭐
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
CHIHUAHUA #93
Vote:yes
Title:Upgrade v9.0.5
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the Chihuahua Mainnet upgrade to v9.0.5, arriving with block #18504000
AKASH NETWORK #291
Vote:abstain
Title:De-AI Hub
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
BABYLON #10
Vote:yes
Title:v2 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the Babylon bbn-1 mainnet upgrade to v2.0.0 at block #596369, introducing Tokenfactory, IBC Callbacks, Rate Limiting, Packet Forwarding, ICA/ICQ, and a CosmWasm security patch, while deprecating the x/crisis module to enhance cross-chain functionality and network security.
INJECTIVE #534
Vote:yes
Title:Update Various Oracle Feeds and iAsset Hourly Funding Rate Caps on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes Yes to decentralize mentioned markets by adopting decentralized Pyth price feeds for SIGN/USDT PERP and KAITO/USDT PERP, and by reducing the hourly funding rate caps for WTI/USDT PERP and iCRCL/USDT PERP from 0.0625% to 0.00275%.
NOLUS #299
Vote:yes
Title:Smart Contract Migration to v0.8.12
Rationale:CryptoCrew backs the v0.8.12 contract migration on Nolus Pirin mainnet, introducing the Market Anomaly Guard to prevent inefficient liquidations during volatile swings by detecting large slippage and allowing governance-set tolerance adjustments.
PERSISTENCE #137
Vote:yes
Title:PersistenceCore v11.21.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the PersistenceCore upgrade to v11.21.0 at block #22492000, which introduces automated stkAsset return logic as part of PSTAKE’s stkAsset deprecation process—enhancing user experience by removing the need for manual claims ahead of the September 30, 2025 deadline
PERSISTENCE #138
Vote:abstain
Title:Reinvesting PCOL Rewards into XPRT/PSTAKE Pool on Persistence DEX
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
DYDX PROTOCOL #255
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #535
Vote:abstain
Title:OLP Reward Disbursement – Epoch 46
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INITIA #46
Vote:abstain
Title:Revert Echelon's VIP Score Contract Address Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
NOLUS #300
Vote:yes
Title:Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC)
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the proposed adjustment to the Oracle swap tree to reroute allSOL trades through a higher-liquidity path, ensuring smoother execution and reduced slippage in Nolus margin markets.
OSMOSIS #948
Vote:abstain
Title:Rebalance Osmosis Treasury towards BTC (25%)
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
KAVA #202
Vote:abstain
Title:Kava Rise Payouts May 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
CHIHUAHUA #94
Vote:yes
Title:Updating Liquidity Pools Params
Rationale:CryptoCrew approves the liquidity parameter changes, including the introduction of a circuit-breaker toggle and swap/withdraw fee adjustments, which enhance flexibility and control ahead of HUAHUASWAP’s deployment
CHIHUAHUA #95
Vote:yes
Title:Updating TokenFactory Params
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports updating TokenFactory parameters to introduce a 10 HUAHUA denom creation fee and 50k gas cost
INITIA #47
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Echelon's VIP Stage 4 Scoring
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
INJECTIVE #537
Vote:abstain
Title:Update Various iAsset Hourly Funding Rate Caps on Injective Exchange dApps
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes Yes to enhance funding rate caps for iHOOD, iMSTR, iCOIN, and iCRCL perps, enabling more efficient pricing under increased market pressure
OSMOSIS #949
Vote:abstain
Title:Deploy BTC/USDC to wide range Magma vault
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
AKASH NETWORK #292
Vote:abstain
Title:H1 2025 AEP Support Services
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SYNTERNET #7
Vote:yes
Title:Synternet Chain Upgrade to v0.24.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Synternet mainnet upgrade to v0.24.0 with the arrival of block #5706304
BITSONG #45
Vote:yes
Title:Software Upgrade: v023 - Gauss
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Bitsong mainnet Gauss upgrade to v0.23.0 at block #22990737
INITIA #48
Vote:yes
Title:Wind Down Rena's Nuwa from VIP
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes to close the Nuwa experiment, which helped explore how users interact with TEE-powered agents
PERSISTENCE #139
Vote:abstain
Title:Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT rewards for July 2025
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
STARGAZE #321
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce Validator Set to 75
Rationale:CryptoCrew generally supports efforts to enhance performance but abstains from validator set adjustments, as they may impact decentralization and reward distribution. We defer this decision to the Stargaze community.
BAND PROTOCOL #14
Vote:yes
Title:BCIP-14: Upgrade to v3
Rationale:CryptoCrew embraces the Bandchain upgrade to v3.0.1 at block #42051400, introducing Cosmos SDK v0.50.13, CometBFT v0.38.17, IBC-Go v8.7.0, Go v1.24.2 and go-owasm v0.3.1. The upgrade adds new modules—tss, bandtss, feeds, tunnel, restake, rollingseed, and globalfee—along with a revamped mempool featuring transaction lanes and prioritization. It also launches the Grogu and Cylinder programs to support feed price submissions and TSS operations
XION #42
Vote:yes
Title:Add Noble to globalfee module
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees to add Noble USDC to the globalfee module
XION #41
Vote:yes
Title:Remove $USDC IBC denomination to Host Zone
Rationale:CryptoCrew agrees with the proposal to update the fee abstraction module by removing support for $USDC from the Noble chain
SYNTERNET #7
Vote:abstain
Title:Synternet Chain Upgrade to v0.24.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew switches to an abstain vote to align with our general policy of neutrality on monetary parameters such as inflation and validator rewards
NOLUS #301
Vote:yes
Title:Adjust MAG Threshold
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes in favor of reducing the Market Anomaly Guard threshold from 30% to 20%, aiming to improve the UX on Nolus and enhance swap reliability during volatile market conditions
INITIA #49
Vote:abstain
Title:Revert Echelon's VIP Score Contract Address
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
COSMOS HUB #1003
Vote:yes
Title:Gaia v25.0.0 Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the Cosmos Hub mainnet upgrade to v25.0.0 at block #26440900, which unforks Gaia from the Cosmos SDK and upgrades core dependencies to cosmos-sdk v0.53.0, wasmvm v2.2.4, and wasmd v0.60.1, significantly reducing technical debt and easing future development.
STARGAZE #322
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$STARGAZE Airdrop
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
DYDX PROTOCOL #256
Vote:abstain
Title:Kuyen Labs - VIP Affiliate Whitelist Proposal
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
BABYLON #11
Vote:yes
Title:v2.2 Software Upgrade
Rationale:CryptoCrew endorses the Babylon Genesis upgrade to v2.2 at block #696120, which delivers important security fixes to both the testnet and mainnet
AKASH NETWORK #293
Vote:abstain
Title:2025 H2 Community Growth Marketing
Rationale:CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
OMNIFLIX #63
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:OmniFlix Hub v6 Upgrade - CANCELLED! 🔴
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
DYDX PROTOCOL #257
Vote:yes
Title:dYdX Chain Software Upgrade v8.1.0
Rationale:CryptoCrew supports the dYdX mainnet upgrade to v8.1.0, arriving at block #48980000, delivering changes to the builder codes, clob tx batching, cross IML and a new market liquidity tier
STARGAZE #323
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$STARGAZE Airdrop Last Chance!
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
SYNTERNET #8
Vote:abstain
Title:Reduce future inflation rates (Chain Upgrade)
Rationale:CryptoCrew would vote positive regarding the chain upgrade to v0.25, abstains though from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
SYNTERNET #9
Vote:abstain
Title:Burn unmigrated token supply
Rationale:CryptoCrew abstains from voting on proposals related to incentive- or reward-structure adjustments as a fundamental policy since April 2023, allowing the community to dictate the outcome. We reserve the right to employ our NO or NO_WITH_VETO stance under circumstances such as proposals deemed as spam, those infringing on minority rights, or those contravening established community rules. Our approach is designed to uphold community integrity and promote transparency while recognizing that our delegators might hold diverse views and may override our abstention through their direct participation in governance. This democratic approach empowers our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities.
TERRA2 #4842
Vote:yes
Title:v2.17.3
Rationale:CryptoCrew votes yes on the Terra mainnet upgrade to v2.17.3 at block #16395000, which delivers Cosmos SDK v0.50, wasmd v0.54.1, PFM v8.1.1, and key CosmWasm- and IBC hooks-related fixes.
OMNIFLIX #64
Vote:no_with_veto
Title:$Ethereum Airdrop Last chance!
Rationale:CryptoCrew strongly advises against interacting with links in this proposal due to their association with malicious websites that may compromise user data and security
INITIA #50
Vote:yes
Title:Proposal: Inertia OP Bridge Parameter Update
Rationale:CryptoCrew welcomes the proposed Inertia bridge parameter change, which reduces the finalization period of the Ophost module from over 9 days to 7 days.
* Rationale condensed for readability; refer to the full version above for details.

You may also like

Contact & Support

support@ccvalidators.com | office@ccvalidators.com | info@ccvalidators.com

Partners & collaborators