CryptoCrew Validators Governance Update August 2024
31. August 2024
Dear Community,
We are delighted to share an update on our governance activities for August 2024. This month, we diligently reviewed over 40 networks and participated in 127 voting sessions across 21 different chains, always with the best interests of our community in the Cosmos ecosystem at the forefront. Our records for August also highlight a significant milestone: we have now surpassed 3,000 governance proposal votes, consistently advocating for the best interests of our delegators.
Your delegations empower us to maintain the high quality of this service, ensuring that we represent our collective interests effectively. Remember, you have the autonomy to override our votes with your preferences on any active proposal. We deeply value your trust and support in us.
| DYDX PROTOCOL #128 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Launch Incentives - Season 5 Distribution |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #129 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update RNDR exchanges to add Binance and Gate with ticker RENDER, rename Coinbase ticker to RENDER, and increase min_exchanges to 2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the RNDR related token updates and parameter changes, namingly changing the min_exchanges to 2 and updating the exchange_config_json to include Binance & Gate.io's RENDER & update Coinbase Pro's ticker to Render |
| GRAVITY BRIDGE #232 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Setup Althea L1 IBC Auto-Forwarding |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the establishment of the bech32 address prefix 'althea' as an IBC Auto-Forwarding prefix for SendToCosmos transactions |
| GRAVITY BRIDGE #233 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add Althea L1 Metadata to Gravity Bridge |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of connecting the Althea L1 to the Gravity Bridge by establishing metadata for the IBC denom ibc/5B7B34C07642FAEAC81C04C488D5D622D7900600A9B37426EB0FA0B4D30AA9CE, in order to deploy an ERC20 representation on Ethereum for the Althea token |
| OSMOSIS #813 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed BTC: Canonicalization and Quote asset |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favour of recognizing the allBTC alloyed asset as the canonical version of BTC on the Osmosis DEX, replacing WBTC and WBTC.eth.axl as quote asset for creating supercharged pools |
| OSMOSIS #814 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed BTC: Create Volume Splitting Group |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also votes in favour of the new VSG creation for allBTC/Stable pools (IDs #1941, #1942, #1943, #1944, #1945 & #1946), in relation to accepting allBTC as cannonical asset on the Osmosis DEX |
| OSMOSIS #815 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed BTC: Initial Static Rate Limits |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports setting the initial max. Static Rate Limit for assets within allBTC pools, limiting the excessive asset type change within a set period to 100% for WBTC, 50% for WBTC.eth.axl and 5% for nBTC |
| OSMOSIS #816 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed ETH: Canonicalization and Claim Admin |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the allETG alloyed asset as the canonical version of ETH on the Osmosis DEX and supports assigning Osmosis Governance as the admin, as well as replacing ETH.axl incentive group with allETH by creating a new VSG and replacing ETH.eth.axl with allETH as quote asset for supercharged pool creation |
| OSMOSIS #817 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed ETH: Create Volume Splitting Group |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the allETG alloyed asset as the canonical version of ETH on the Osmosis DEX and supports assigning Osmosis Governance as the admin, as well as replacing ETH.axl incentive group with allETH by creating a new VSG and replacing ETH.eth.axl with allETH as quote asset for supercharged pool creation |
| OSMOSIS #818 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed ETH: Quote asset |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew recognizes the allETG alloyed asset as the canonical version of ETH on the Osmosis DEX and supports assigning Osmosis Governance as the admin, as well as replacing ETH.axl incentive group with allETH by creating a new VSG and replacing ETH.eth.axl with allETH as quote asset for supercharged pool creation |
| OSMOSIS #819 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Remove Quote Asset whitelisting requirement for Supercharged Pools |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to remove the Quote Asset whitelisting requirement to allow for a wider range of asset pairings for supercharged pools |
| KUJIRA #667 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Create DAO: Kujira Operations DAO |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew leaves a positive vote on the proposal to create the Kujira Operations DAO |
| PERSISTENCE #113 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with XPRT, and stkXPRT rewards for August 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| TERRA2 #4816 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | The Phoenix Directive - A Path Forward |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| INJECTIVE #421 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Injex Finance Router and Limit Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support the Injex Finance Router & Limit Contract uploads due to missing audit reports, no discussion or introduction in the governance forum and uncertainty about the safety of user funds |
| NOLUS #136 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pirin v0.6.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Nolus Pirin-1 Eden adoption, upgrading the mainnet to v0.6.2 at block #6556000, delivering Cosmos SDK v50, CosmWasm 2.0, ABCI 2.0, IAVL v1, Modular SDK, IBC Callbacks and Swagger API |
| NOLUS #137 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reduce The Minimum Utilization Threshold Temporarily (Neutron Noble USDC Pool) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to temporarily modify the Neutron Noble USDC Pool's min. utilization threshold to 0% to allow for lenders to move funds to the axlUSDC pool |
| NOLUS #138 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reduce The Minimum Utilization Threshold Temporarily (Osmosis Noble USDC Pool) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also votes yes to temporarily modify the Osmosis Noble USDC Pool's min. utilization threshold to 0% to allow for lenders to move funds to the axlUSDC pool |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #131 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add MAVIA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the introduction of the MAVIA-USD perpetual market on the dYdX exchange, citing the token's brief history, limited liquidity, and small market cap |
| INJECTIVE #422 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update min_notional for all spot and derivative markets with known quote assets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposed changes to the min_notional parameter for spot and derivative markets containing USDT, USDTkv, INJ, USDC, UST, USDe, WETH, as detailed in the proposal |
| COSMOS HUB #944 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Authorize DAO DAO Deployment |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the authorization of the mentioned wallet to deploy the latest audited DAODAO contracts on the Cosmos Hub, advancing governance and enabling Cosmos Hub DAOs on daodao.zone |
| OMNIFLIX #42 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Deploy NFT Launchpad Contracts on OmniFlix Hub (Phase 1) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the structured rollout of OmniFlix's open-sourced CosmWasm contracts, which aims to expand the NFT toolkit across several phases: Phase 1 features OEM Factory and MMOEM contracts; Phase 2 introduces the OEM contract; Phase 3 adds the Minter Factory and Classic Minter contracts; and Phase 4 includes the Round Whitelist Factory and Round Whitelist contracts |
| OSMOSIS #820 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migrate Incentives to Alloyed BTC and ETH VSGs |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the migration of incentives from WBTC & ETH.axl volume splitting groups to alloyed BTC and ETH-based VSGs, following proposals #814 and #817, which previously recognized alloyed BTC and ETH as the canonical versions on the Osmosis DEX. |
| OSMOSIS #821 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Send ampOSMO and boneOSMO liquidity to custodial multisig |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| EVMOS #303 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Evmos Mainnet v19.1.0 Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of the EVMOS mainnet upgrade to v19.1.0, scheduled for block #22763500. This upgrade enables STRv2, implements opcode customizability, adds EVM permissioning customization, introduces IBC rate-limit middleware, and updates the Cosmos SDK to v0.47.8-evmos, ibc-go to v7.5.2, and CometBFT to 0.37.9. |
| EVMOS #304 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reduce Inflation from 5% to 1% |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew encourages dialogue on resolving issues related to Evmos chain inflation mechanisms but abstains from voting, due to a conflict of interest arising from reliance on inflation-driven income to cover infrastructure expenditures |
| DYMENSION #20 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | AMM Incentive #6 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #945 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal - Permissionless ICS |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the CHIP signaling proposal for updating ICS to become fully permissionless, enabling anyone to create a consumer chain via single transaction on the Cosmos Hub, meeting essential consumer chain demands and enabling to effectively scale ICS. We also support the proposed concept of consumer-chain ownership, which enables proactive parameter management and other community/DAO decisions via on-chain governance. |
| AXELAR #215 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Multichain Nation: Podcast Grant Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| AXELAR #215 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Axelarators Telegram Group and Ecosystem X Account: 6-Month Program Renewal Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #946 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Lend ATOM on Mars v2 on Neutron |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #132 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update min price change ppm, double rate limit |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to update the "min_price_change_ppm" tick-size parameter (minimum price change parts per million) to 500 for the DYDX-, BTC-, ETH-, LINK-, MATIC-, CRV-, SOL-, ADA-, AVAX-, FIL-, LTC-, DOGE-, ATOM-, DOT-, UNI-, BCH-, TRX-, NEAR-, XLM-, ETC-, WLD-, APT-, ARB-, OP-, PEPE-, SHIB-, SUI-, XRP-, TIA-, EOS-, STX-, GRT- and WIF-USD markets. Also we agree to adjust the block_rate_limit_config to limit:4000 per num_blocks:5, enabling users to effectively double their orders on the dYdX DEX |
| AXELAR #217 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Axelar Brazilian and Spanish Community - 1 Year Continuity and Expansion Plan |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| AXELAR #218 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Final & Revised Proposal to Revamp and Improve Axelar Network Documentation |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #134 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update RNDR ticker to RENDER, add Bybit and Okx, and increase min_exchanges to 3 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the RNDR ticker update to RENDER, also adding Bybit and OKX to the Render perpetual market's oracles and increasing the min_exchanges parameter to 3 |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #133 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add ZERO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the ZERO-USD perpetual market introduction on the dYdX exchange, citing the token's brief history, limited liquidity, and small market cap |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #135 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add VRTX-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not consider the addition of the VRTX-USD market to be beneficial for the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #136 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add MICHI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew objects to the inclusion of the MICHI-USD perpetual market on the dYdX exchange |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #138 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add FOXY-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew disapproves of the addition of the FOXY-USD perp market to dYdX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #137 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add AURORA-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of establishing the AURORA-USD perpetual market on dYdX, implementing the essential x/prices, x/perpetuals, and x/clob parameters & moving the market to ACTIVE after 3600 blocks |
| OSMOSIS #822 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist StreamSwap DAO Deployment Address to Upload Contracts |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not support whitelisting of any address kind, project or person to deploy contracts on the Osmosis mainnet without further governance approval. We've been sticking to this conservative stance and can make no exception |
| OSMOSIS #823 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Upload Transmuter v3.2 as Cosmwasm Pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Transmuter CosmWasm pool contract update to v3.2, delivering changes to static limiter checks |
| OSMOSIS #824 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Remove OSMO Pairing Incentives except OSMO/STABLE |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of transitioning incentives to OSMO pairing pools that incorporate stablecoins by establishing new VSGs, aiming to strengthen stable asset pairings |
| OSMOSIS #825 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Increase scope of Protocol Fee Controller subDAO and endorse 0.2% ATOM/OSMO protocol fee |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the experiment to encourage primary pairings of OSMO and other listed assets on the Osmosis DEX to be paired with stable tokens, hence granting the Protocol Fee Controller SubDAO authority to adjust protocol fees beyond their initial scope |
| SOMMELIER #164 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | CryptoCrew advocates for a minimum utilization threshold of 65% for the Neutron Noble USDC Pool to enhance lender yields by preventing new deposits until this threshold is met and to optimize utilization rates |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a yes vote to update existing SOMM token prices within the x/cellarfees and x/auction modules |
| MIGALOO #43 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.2.1 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes no due to an erroneous upgrade proposal |
| NOLUS #139 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Neutron Noble USDC Pool) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for a minimum utilization threshold of 65% for the pool to enhance lender yields by preventing new deposits until this threshold is met and to optimize utilization rates |
| NOLUS #140 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Raise The Minimum Utilization Threshold (Osmosis Noble USDC Pool) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the proposal to raise the utilization threshold to 65% for the Osmosis Noble USDC pool, which will enhance returns for lenders by preventing new deposits below this threshold and align utilization closer to the optimal 70% standard of other stablecoin pools |
| KAVA #186 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Kava Rise Payouts July 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #948 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Gaia v19 Software Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew would like to welcome the Cosmos Hub Gaia v19 software upgrade, arriving at block #21835200, upgrading the Cosmos SDK to v0.50 supporting LSM, also upgrading IBC to v8.3.2, CometBFT to v0.38.9, ICS to v5.1.0, PFM to v8.0.2, IBC rate limiting to v8.0.0, Fee market to v1.0.4 and CosmWasm/wasmd to v0.50.0 |
| MIGALOO #44 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.2.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew embraces the Migaloo mainnet upgrade to v4.2.2, delivering all current versions of wasmvm, cosmos-idk, cometbft, IBC-go at block #8322000, also reducing the active validator set to 45 validators |
| BITSONG #38 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | BitSong v0.16.0 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Bitsong v0.16.0 upgrade proposal, delivering pfm v4, feat(fantoken and Golang v1.19x at block height 18310250 |
| OSMOSIS #826 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed Assets: Generic specification approval |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the formal recognition of Alloyed Assets as canonical on the Osmosis DEX, aiming to lessen governance efforts for subsequent Alloyed Asset recognitions and boost user experience, with the stipulation that these assets conform to the outlined criteria and rate limits |
| INJECTIVE #423 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Deployment of Volta Circuit's Multisig Smart Contracts on Injective |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the deployment of the Volta Circuit smart contract because it lacks prior discussion in the governance forum, transparency regarding its GitHub repository, and clear information on whether the code is open or closed source, as well as missing audit result |
| NOLUS #141 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust NLS Incentives Scale |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of adjusting the existing NLS reward scale towards the proposed structure |
| OSMOSIS #828 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migrate incentives to new VSGs |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to migrate the ATOM, TIA and ETH pool incentives to the VSGs created according to Proposal 824 |
| INJECTIVE #424 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Injective Mainnet Upgrade v1.13.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Injective Mainnet upgrade to v1.13.2, arriving with block 82830000, enhancing the WASM-enabled smart contract and integrating a chain update to ensure that events are emitted from the preblocker for improved event tracking |
| INJECTIVE #425 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Disbursement of OLP rewards for epoch ended on 05 August 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| COSMOS HUB #947 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal - Permissionless ICS Frontend |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the introduction of the Permissionless ICS frontend, designed to meet essential user needs by enabling easy access to and engagement with new consumer chains, featuring staking, governance, and community interaction toolkits, aiming to significantly enhance UX for delegators, validators, and developers |
| OSMOSIS #829 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migrate Alloyed Assets to Transmuter v3.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Alloyed Assets migration to the Transmuter v3.2 deployed with proposal #823, allowing for addition of static pool limits |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #139 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add PAXG-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is pleased with the launch of the PAXG-USD perpetual market on the dYdX DEX, marking it as the first DEX to list perpetuals for PAXG |
| COSMOS HUB #950 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Signaling Proposal: Migrate Prop 800 Funds from AADAO Multisig to a Valence Covenant Controlled by ATOM Governance |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the move to shift the temporary management of POL from AADAO’s Multisig to a Valence Covenant as outlined in proposal #800, assigning the liquidity position and total control of the funds to the Cosmos Hub Governance |
| COSMOS HUB #951 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | $ATOM Airdrop - Drop (Liquid Staking) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| KUJIRA #670 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Deploy WINK-USDC FIN Market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the WINK-USDC FIN Market deployment |
| EVMOS #305 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Inferno 6.0 - Continuation of Forge Incentives |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| GRAVITY BRIDGE #234 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Gravity Bridge Chain Fee Increase |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the MinChainFeeBasisPoints parameter change to 20 |
| SOMMELIER #165 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Token Prices - August 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to update the existing token prices to their 52 week highs & SOMM's price to it's 52 week low |
| KUJIRA #671 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Upload ampMNTA v1.4.0 contract |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the ampMNTA v1.4.0 contract upload due to missing information about the contract and implications |
| KAVA #187 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Enable Committee MsgVote for EIP712 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports enabling the MsgVote message type in order to allow the Committee to vote on governance proposals utilizing the EIP-712 standard |
| EVMOS #306 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Reduce Max Validators to 20 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains due to a conflict of interest of being an active validator on the Evmos mainnet |
| EVMOS #307 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Chain Regenesis Signaling Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favour of the Evmos Chain Regenesis, cleaning up the state and reducing database size by removing millions of XEN related smart contracts, improving network performance |
| EVMOS #308 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | $EVMOS Airdrop - Drop (Liquid Staking) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #140 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add GME-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not endorse the GME-USD perp market addition to the dYdX DEX |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #141 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add DRIFT-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains regarding the DRIFT-USD perp market listing to the dYdX exchange |
| SECRET NETWORK #305 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | $SECRET Airdrop - Drop (Liquid Staking) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| NOLUS #142 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Expedited Proposal Params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the modifications to the expedited governance proposal parameters on the Nolus Mainnet, boosting the minimum deposit to 10k NLS, setting the threshold at 66.7%, and cutting down the voting time from three days to a single day |
| NOLUS #143 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pin New Contract Codes |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the proposal to implement code pinning for the new contract codes from smart contract version v0.7.2 on the Nolus Pirin mainnet, significantly reducing gas requirements for transactions by keeping the contract codes readily available in memory |
| AXELAR #221 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Axelar v1.0 Upgrade Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Alexar upgrade to v1.0 at block #14231100 |
| JUNO #354 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Juno Upgrade (v24) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Juno Network upgrade to v24, arriving with block #19022500, fixing some minor bugs and pushing versions to the latest standard |
| MARS #198 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Reactivate expired IBC client for UX |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the client update between Mars and UX after successfully checking the clients: |
| TERRA2 #4817 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Launching Terra Liquidity Alliance |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| OSMOSIS #830 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed USDT: Add USDT.eth.inj |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the addition of USDT.rt as another constituent of Alloyed USDT with an introductory static limit of 5%. |
| OSMOSIS #831 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Alloyed USDT: Add USDT.eth.inj |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in support of adding USDT.eth.inj as constituent of the Alloyed USDT pool, introducing a static limit of 20% |
| OSMOSIS #832 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Expand BTC Volume Splitting Group to USDT 0.01% pool |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the initiative to create a new BTC/Stable Volume Splitting Group, merging current pools with a new BTC/USDT 0.01% pool, and pre-emptively moving incentives to this new group in the forthcoming adjustments |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #142 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Re-Launch Incentives after dYdX Unlimited upgrade with $20M over 6 Months administered by Chaos Labs |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| EVMOS #309 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Evmos Mainnet v19.2.0 Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Evmos Mainnet upgrade to v19.2.0, scheduled for block #23107500, which introduces automatic ERC-20 code hash registration on dynamic precompiles and addresses EIP parsing issues for archive queries |
| NOLUS #144 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Smart Contract Migration to v0.7.2 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew endorses the migration of the Nolus smart contracts to v0.7.2 , dividing the architecture into essential universal contracts and adaptable specific contracts, also phasing out assets like EVMOS and MARS due to low liquidity and integrates stATOM and dATOM for new trading strategies |
| MIGALOO #45 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Migaloo Upgrade v4.2.3 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Migaloo Mainnet Upgrade to v4.2.3, being delivered with block #8471000, upgrading wasmd to it's latest instance |
| SECRET NETWORK #306 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | HackSecret IV is on the Horizon |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| TERRA2 #4818 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Chain Upgrade v2.12 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the transition of the Terra Chain to version 2.12.1 at block #11860000, adopting a minimum 5% commission rate for validators as approved by governance, the destruction of illicitly minted IBC exploiter assets and TFL’s LUNA, along with the removal of the temporary blacklist functionality |
| TERRA2 #4819 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Phoenix Directive - Terra Recovery Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| PERSISTENCE #114 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal for 1M XPRT Allocation to Boost Multi-DEX Liquidity |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| INJECTIVE #426 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Whitelist Gelotto Developer Wallet for Wasm Upload: PampIT |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes against whitelisting Gelotto's address for deploying smart contracts on the Injective Network without additional governance approval, reflecting our conservative approach to whitelisting. We recommend that results from third-party code audits be presented before any code deployments to the Injective Network are approved |
| COSMOS HUB #953 | |
| Vote: | no_with_veto |
| Title: | ATOM Airdrop - Hot Airdrop - New Version 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advises users to exercise caution and avoid interacting with links in this proposal, as they have been identified as leading to malicious websites that endanger user security and privacy |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #143 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add EURC-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew accepts the EURC-USD perpetual market addition to the dYdX exchange by adding the neccesary x/prices, x/perpetuals and x/clob parameters, creating the market in INITIALIZING status and transition it to ACTIVE status after 3600 blocks |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #144 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Add RETARDIO-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew does not endorse the RETARDIO-USD market addition to the dYdX DEX |
| INJECTIVE #427 | |
| Vote: | no |
| Title: | Upload Injex Finance Staking Contract Wasm Code |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew opposes the authorization of the Injex Finance Staking Contract Wasm Code for deployment on the Injective Network, citing a lack of initial discussions in the governance forum, insufficient transparency about its GitHub repository, and ambiguity over whether the code is open or closed source. We advocate for the presentation of third-party code audits prior to approval |
| NOLUS #145 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis axlUSDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to update the Oracle swap tree for the Osmosis axlUSDC protocol, aiming to refine swap routes, also delisting EVMOS, LVN and QSR |
| NOLUS #146 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also advocates for updating the Oracle swap tree for the Osmosis USDC protocol for enhanced swap routes on the Nolus protocol by delisting EVMOS, LVN, and QSR |
| NOLUS #147 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Astroport Noble USDC) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the proposal to adjust the Neutron USDC Oracle swap tree, enhancing the utilization of the dATOM/USDC pool for lease long positions |
| NOLUS #148 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Expedited Proposal Params |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew approves the gov module parameter updates s by setting the Minimum Deposit Ratio to 0.01 |
| SECRET NETWORK #308 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Secret Network v1.14 Upgrade |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the Secret Network upgrade to v1.14, being rolled out with secret-4 block #15794777 |
| SECRET NETWORK #307 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Support Team Funding Proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| NOLUS #149 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle Swap Tree (Osmosis stATOM) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes on the proposal to refine the Oracle swap tree for the Osmosis stATOM short protocol to enhance leasing operations on Nolus and include the price of NLS to guarantee the distribution of incentives |
| NOLUS #150 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register First Price Feeder (Osmosis stATOM Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the adoption of the first Osmosis stATOM Oracle price feeder, pushing a price every 60 seconds, significantly improving price data accuracy and responsiveness |
| NOLUS #151 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Second Price Feeder (Osmosis stATOM Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also supports the addition of a second price feeder to the Osmosis stATOM Oracle, enhancing data reliability and accuracy through geographic diversification and continuous updates |
| NOLUS #152 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Third Price Feeder (Osmosis stATOM Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew also endorses the addition of the third price feeder to the Osmosis stATOM Oracle, enhancing the robustness of the price calculation mechanism with multiple geographically diverse data inputs |
| NOLUS #153 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Fourth Price Feeder (Osmosis stATOM Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to incorporating the fourth price feeder into the Osmosis stATOM Oracle |
| NOLUS #154 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Register Fifth Price Feeder (Osmosis stATOM Oracle) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the setup of the fifth price feeder for the Osmosis stATOM Oracle improving the reliability and breadth of market information |
| NOLUS #155 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Leaser Parameters (Osmosis stATOM) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew agrees to the proposed changes in the Leaser smart contract settings for the Osmosis stATOM on the Nolus Pirin mainnet, setting new liability levels, extending the interest due period, and dedicating a portion of interest to protocol enhancements |
| NOLUS #156 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust LPP Parameters (Osmosis stATOM) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew concurs with the stATOM LPP smart contract parameter modifications, setting the base interest rate at 6% and the optimal utilization threshold at 70%, aligning with other lending markets |
| NOLUS #157 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update Oracle EMA Config (Osmosis stATOM) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew advocates for the update to the stATOM Oracle’s EMA configuration, increasing the sample period and decrease the discount factor, collectively aiming to yield more stable and reliable price data |
| SOMMELIER #166 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Test Arbitrum Cellar for PeggyJV |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes in favor of the PeggyJV Cellar deployment to test various strategist tools on the Arbitrum Layer |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #145 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add DAI-USD perpetual market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew welcomes the DAI-USD perpetual market deployment on the dYdX DEX |
| AXELAR #223 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Axelar road to Blockchaincon (Onboarding & Hackathon) |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| AXELAR #222 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Revised Axelar Brazilian and Spanish Community - 6 Month Continuity and Expansion Plan |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
| AXELAR #224 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Adjust Block Parameters |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the Axelar max_bytes and max_gas parameter changes to 5242880 and 400000000 |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #146 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Update EURC exchanges to add Coinbase Pro as a source |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew casts a vote in favor of updating the EURC-USD market by adding Coinbase Pro to the EURC oracle sources consisting of Bitstamp and Huobi, enhancing the oracle's price robustness |
| INJECTIVE #428 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Enable instant derivative markets launch |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew abstains due to missing information about the proposal on the Injective Discord channel and the governance forum |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #148 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Add new liquidity tiers, update liquidity tiers for SOL and for isolated markets |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew votes yes to the proposed changes regarding liquidity tiers and isolated markets |
| DYDX PROTOCOL #147 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Wind down MATIC-USD market |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew backs the phase-out of the MATIC-USD market on the dYdX DEX and the commencement of the final settlement, following the replacement of MATIC with POL |
| INJECTIVE #429 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | INJ 3.0: Tokenomics Upgrade - August |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew takes a neutral stance on the proposed changes to the Injective chain's inflation parameters introduced in the INJ 3.0 tokenomics upgrade |
| NOLUS #158 | |
| Vote: | yes |
| Title: | Pirin v0.6.3 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew supports the rollout of v0.6.3 on the Nolus Pirin mainnet at block #7006500, featuring an essential update to the latest version of the CometBFT consensus engine and a reduction in block times due to improved disk optimizations and updated node configurations from the Eden upgrade |
| OSMOSIS #833 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Osmosis Inflation Reduction proposal |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew values the discussions regarding Osmosis chain inflation but will abstain from voting on such proposals given our biased position as a validator dependent on these rewards for operational sustainability, bearing a conflict of interest |
| OSMOSIS #834 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Update Incentives in line with inflation reduction |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew refrains from voting on the proposed reduction of redirected incentives to the community pool, as per proposal #833, due to a conflict of interest |
| ARCHWAY #49 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Proposal to reduce the Archway validator set & network inflation rate |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew is against approving this proposal, which bundles two distinct topics: validator reduction and chain inflation. We advocate for splitting these into separate proposals for clearer decision-making |
| PERSISTENCE #115 | |
| Vote: | abstain |
| Title: | Incentivization of Persistence DEX pools with stkXPRT rewards for September 2024 |
| Rationale: | CryptoCrew has decided to abstain from participating in any community pool spend proposals as a matter of principle. This decision, made in April 2023, is intended to ensure that we accurately represent and uphold the interests of our community. We reserve the right to use our NO or NO_WITH_VETO option in specific cases. These cases include, but are not limited to, situations where the proposal is considered spam (i.e., irrelevant to the respective chain/community), disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently established by the respective chain/community. By maintaining this stance, we aim to protect the integrity of the community and its governance processes, promote transparency, and safeguard against actions that may compromise the well-being of our members or the broader ecosystem. However, we recognize that our delegators may have differing opinions on these matters. To ensure that their voices are heard and respected, our delegators have the option to override our decision by participating in the voting process themselves. This enables a more inclusive and democratic approach to community decision-making, empowering our delegators to actively shape the direction and values of the community in alignment with their own perspectives and priorities. |
